Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ghost in the Machine: Enabling Public Administration for an Enabling State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Capital and Enterprise in the Modern State

  • 392 Accesses

Abstract

How states view their role in protecting and promoting the welfare of their citizens is in a constant state of flux. Increasingly nationalistic rhetoric in some places, ‘deep state’ conspiracy theories in others and the rise of individualism all over the globe present new challenges to the rationale for and fabric of the welfare state. Alongside this, global challenges of climate change, rising inequality and related mass migration present renewed imperatives to reconsider ideas of global solidarity and global welfare. At the same time, in many ‘developed countries’ persistent societal problems confront virtually all governments, accompanied by seemingly inexorable budgetary pressures, not least those arising from pressure to maintain expanded and expensive welfare systems. It is the latter that is considered to have significantly influenced the emergence of the concept of the ‘enabling state. This chapter explores the idea of the enabling state but does so from the perspective of public administration, the machinery of the state. In particular, it suggests that public administration systems, the machinery that keeps states functioning, themselves must be enabled so that they can genuinely enable others to address poverty, social exclusion and inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aberbach, J. (2003). Administration in an era of change. Governance, 16(3), 315–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Political Science Association. (2004). American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Washington, DC: APSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghman, J. (1995). Social exclusion in Europe: Policy context and analytical framework. In G. Room (Ed.), Beyond the threshold: The measurement and analysis of social exclusion. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, R., Horner, L., & Lekhi, R. (2006). Public value, politics and public management: A literature review. London: The Work Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional Public Administration and the new Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Leigreid, P. (2007). Transcending new public management: The transformation of public sector reforms. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (2012). The possibilities and politics of the relational state. The relational state: How recognising the importance of human relationships could revolutionise the role of the state. London: IPPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, R. C., & Sverrisson, A.S. (2001). Decentralisation and poverty alleviation in developing countries: a comparative analysis or, is West Bengal unique? Working Paper No. 130. Brighton: IDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, D. (2006). Mind sets and methods: Poverty strategies and the awkward potential of the enabling state. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2), 150–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earles, W., & Moon, J. (2000). Pathways to the Enabling State: Changing modes of social provision in Western Australian community services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(4), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvidge, J. (2012). The Enabling State: A discussion paper. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvidge, J. (2014). A route map to an Enabling State. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. J. (2000). Reclaiming John Dewey: Democracy, inquiry, pragmatism and public management. Administration and Society, 32(3), 308–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2013). Citizenship in the enabling state: The changing balance of rights and obligations. In A. Evers & A. Guillemard (Eds.), Social policy and citizenship: The changing landscape. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Gilbert, B. (1989). The enabling state: Modern welfare capitalism in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornbein, R., & Simrell King, C. (2012). Should we be teaching public participation? Student responses and MPA program practices. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(4), 717–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellis, D. S., & Ran, B. (2012). Modern leadership principles for public administration: Time to move forward. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(1), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2004). Let’s hear it for Humpty: Social exclusion, the third way and cultural capital. Cultural Trends, 13(50), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, J. (2010). Twenty-first-century public leadership within complex governance systems: Some reflections. Policy and Politics, 38(4), 657–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyhne, I., Nielsen, H., & Bjørn Aaen, S. (2016). What determines the substantive influence of public participation? An investigation of planners’ views on conditions for participatory practices in Denmark. Planning Practice and Research, 31(3), 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, N., Armstrong, R., & Marinova, D. (2004). Participatory development for regional sustainability in Western Australia: An enabling state? Local Environment, 9(6), 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, C., & Finn, C. (2015). Caring at what cost? Rebuilding and refinancing the community and voluntary sector. Dublin: Impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, C., & Finn, C. (2016). Leadership challenges in civic engagement. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, W., Miller, R., & Stevens, B. (2001). Governance in the 21st century: Power in the global knowledge economy and society. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, R. S. (2008). Developing public leaders in an age of collaborative governance. In R. S. Morse & T. F. Buss (Eds.), Innovations in public leadership development. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, R. S. (2010). Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 231–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyson, S., Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2017). Organizational socialization in public administration research. The American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507401769616.

  • Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (2006). Political institutions and social power. In I. Shapiro, S. Skowronek, & D. Galvin (Eds.), Rethinking political institutions: The art of the State. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, K. (2003). Social class and public Administration: A closed question opens. Administration & Society, 35(4), 438–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, N. (2012). Under pressure: The drivers of a new centre-left statecraft. In C. Graeme & M. Rick (Eds.), The Relational State: How recognising the importance of human relationships could revolutionise the role of the state. London: IPPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollit, C. (1995). Management techniques for the public sector: Pulpit and practice. In B. G. Peters & D. J. Savoie (Eds.), Governance in a changing environment. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the Platonic Guardians. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricard, L. M., Klijn, E. H., Lewis, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2016). Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: A comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Management Review, 19, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2002). Governance and public policy in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (2008). Hybrid States: Globalisation and the politics of state capacity. Political Studies, 56, 566–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. (2012). Another size fits all? Public value management and challenges for institutional design. Public Management Review, 15(4), 477–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5-6), 531–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, E. (1997). Democracy and empowerment. Public Administration, 75, 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. Y. T., & Anderson, M. H. (2012). Civic capacity: Building on transformational leadership to explain successful integrative public leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (2000). New Labour and the enabling state. Health & Social Care in the Community, 8(6), 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer, F. (2009). Public sector reform and the rise of the enabling state: An approach to analysis. In R. Mathur (Ed.), Glimpses of civil service reform (pp. 171–195). Hyderabad: Idfai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Thiel, S. (2011). Comparing agencification in Central Eastern European and Western European Countries: Fundamentally alike in unimportant respects. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 7(Special Issue), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. (2013). The rise of the Enabling State: A review of policy evidence across the UK and Ireland. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampler, B. (2008). When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil. Comparative Politics, 41(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteford, G. E. (2003). Enhancing occupational opportunities in communities: Politics’ third way and the concept of the Enabling State. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(1), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I., & Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising public value: Past, present and futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Chris McInerney

Authors
  1. Chris McInerney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Éidín Ní Shé

  2. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

    Lorelle J. Burton

  3. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

    Patrick Alan Danaher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McInerney, C. (2018). The Ghost in the Machine: Enabling Public Administration for an Enabling State. In: Ní Shé, É., Burton, L., Danaher, P. (eds) Social Capital and Enterprise in the Modern State. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68115-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation