Abstract
Based on the empirical findings from Chap. 9 and an overview of the institutional history of the US textile and apparel industries, policy prescriptions for the growth of the US industry are suggested. Namely, we suggest the formation of a textile extension program (TEP) and/or an apparel extension program (AEP) might be able to inform firm principals which universities or research institutes have greater expertise to solve specific manufacturing or production issues. TEP and/or AEP hubs might also point firm principals to regional or national research programs that are aligned well with their manufacturing or production needs.
Don’t ever take a fence down until you know why it was put up.
—Robert Frost
The difference between style and fashion is quality.
—Giorgio Armani
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Declines in employment that are not related to production decreases.
- 2.
HS codes have slowly replaced SITC codes; therefore, we use HS codes to refer to each type of product classification.
- 3.
Recall from Chap. 5 that the mean size of a firm in our final sample of firms from the AEGIS database is about 11 employees, and the mean age of a firm is about 7 years.
- 4.
NIST is part of the US Department of Commerce. See: http://www.nist.gov/mep/about/index.cfm.
- 5.
Following Link and Maskin (2016), it can be shown theoretically that the expected net return to a company’s investment in in-house R&D will be greater if the company receives from an external source relevant information about the technology being developed. In the Link and Maskin model, the external source is NASA; in the case relevant to this paper, the external source would be an MEP-like organization.
References
American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA). (2006). American Apparel and Footwear Association trends: 2005 ed. Virginia: AAFA.
American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA). (2009). An annual statistical analysis of the U.S. Apparel & Footwear Industries annual 2008 edition (pp. 1–11). Arlington: American Apparel & Footwear Association.
Borneman, J. (2007). U.S. textiles: Optimism, change and innovation. Textile World, 157(2). Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login? url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/195637844?accountid=14604
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2003). Current employment statistics survey (1997–2003). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2008). Textile product, and apparel manufacturing. In Career guide to industries, 2008–09 edition. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/oco/cg/cgs015.htm
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2016). Occuptational employment and wages, May 2015. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ocwage_03302016.pdf.
Carlton, D., & Coclanis, P. (2005). Southern textiles in global context. In S. Delfino & M. Gillespie (Eds.), Global perspectives on industrial transformation in the American South (pp. 151–174). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Cooper, W. D. (1973). An introduction to the US textile industry of the 70s. North Carolina: Department of Textiles Extension and Continuing Education.
Corral, C. (2005). Product innovations drive strong bath market. Home Textiles Today, 26(29). Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login? url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/223054203?accountid=14604
Delfino, S., & Gillespie, M. (2005). Global perspectives on industrial transformation in the American South. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Dockery, A. (2005). Mills stress innovation, marketing. Textile World, 155(1), 16–17.
Doeringer, P., & Crean, S. (2006). Can fast fashion save the US apparel industry? Socio-Economic Review, 4(3), 353–377.
European Skills Council. (2014). European sector skills council textile clothing leather footwear report 2014. Brussels: European Skills Council.
Gaventa, J., & Smith, B. E. (1991). The deindustrialization of the textile south: A case study. In J. Leiter, M. Shulman, & R. Zingraff (Eds.), Hanging by a thread: Social change in southern textiles (pp. 181–198). New York: Cornell University.
Gelb, B. (2001). RS20436: Textile and apparel trade issues. CRS Report for Congress. Retrieved from http://www.ncseonline.org/nle/crsreports/economics/econ-134.cfm
Glass, B. D. (1992). The textile industry in North Carolina. North Carolina: Division of Archives and History of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources.
Hodges, N., & Frank, P. (2013). The case of the disappearing mill village. Textile: A Journal of Cloth and Culture, 11(1), 38–57.
Hodges, N., & Karpova, E. (2006). Employment in the U.S. textile and apparel industries: Comparative analysis of regional vs. national trends. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 10(2), 209–226.
Hodges, N., & Karpova, E. (2008). A tale of two industries: An interpretive analysis of media reports on textiles and apparel in North Carolina. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 26(3), 253–272.
Link, A. N., & Maskin, E. S. (2016). Does information about previous projects promote R&D on the International Space Station?” In P. Besha, & A. MacDonald (Eds.), Economic development of low Earth orbit (pp. 43–59). National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
McCurry, J. (2008). Increased competition drives more innovation in North America. Technical Textiles International (TTI), 17(3), 11–14.
Mittica, C. J., Lavenduski, S., & Ruvo, C. (2012). Immigration: The multinational face of apparel production. Wearables, 56–57. Retrieved from http://www.wearablesmag.com
Monget, K. (2014). Innovations lead growth in innerwear. WWD, 207(17). Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login? url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1492102705?accountid=14604
Nash-Hoff, M. (2014). How San Diego reflects national manufacturing trends. Industry Week. Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login? url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1491340246?accountid=14604
National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO). (n.d.-a). U.S. textile industry. Retrieved from http://www.ncto.org/ustextiles/index.asp
National Council of Textile Organizations (NCTO). (n.d.-b). Textile employment and economic impact. Retrieved from http://www.ncto.org/industryemployment/index.asp
Puig, F., & Marques, H. (2011). The dynamic evolution of the proximity effect in the textile industry. European Planning Studies, 19(8), 1423–1439.
Qubein, N. (2013). Self-starters. Business, North Carolina, 33(5). Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1355932878?accountid=14604
Research and Markets. (2010). US apparel manufacturing report: 8000 companies such as Levi Strauss, Phillips-Van Heusen, VF corporation, and Warnaco with annual revenue of approx. $20 billion. Retrieved from http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100830005736/en/Research-Markets-Apparel-Manufacturing-Report-8000-Companies
Rowan, L. (2014). Made in America, maybe: The potential renaissance of domestic apparel manufacturing in the United States. (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/709794
Schacht, W. H. (2013). Manufacturing extension partnership program: An overview. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Schmidt, G. (2016). ‘Made in the USA’ turns out to be challenging: ‘Reshoring’ is more suited to the luxury market. Dayton Daily News. Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login? url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1807736120?accountid=14604
SelectUSA summer forum: Reinvesting in America, creating jobs at home. (2014). Targeted news service. Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login? url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1543150067?accountid=14604
Simpson, W. H. (1948). Southern textile communities. Charlotte: American Cotton Manufacturers Association.
Small Business Administration (SBA). (2015). Database [data file]. Retrieved from https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/firm-size-data
Suggs, G. G. (2002). ‘My world is gone’: Memories of life in a southern cotton mill town. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Textiles Intelligence Limited. (2010). Labour costs in the textile industry, by country, 1980–2008. Textile Outlook International, 143, 128.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Statistics of U.S. businesses. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/econ/susb/
U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2006). Cotton: Background. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/cotton/ustextileapparel.htm
U.S. Department of Commerce. (n.d.). Contribution of the U.S. textile and apparel industries to the U.S. economy. Retrieved from https://www.bis.doc.gov/defenseindustrialbaseprograms/osies/defmarketresearchrpts/texreport_ch2.html
Uluskan, M., Joines, J., & Blanton Godfrey, A. (2016). Comprehensive insight into supplier quality and the impact of quality strategies of suppliers on outsourcing decisions. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(1), 92–102.
United Nations Statistical Office. (2015). Yearbook of international trade statistics. Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, Statistical Office, United Nations. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/trade
Wessner, C. W. (2013). 21st Century manufacturing: The role of the manufacturing extension partnership program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Woodruff, J. L., & Michael McDonald, J. (Eds.). (1982). Handbook of textile marketing. New York: Fairchild Publications.
Yepes, R. (2009). Engineering value networks in the fashion industry. In L. Walter, G. A. Kartsounis, & S. Carosio (Eds.), Transforming clothing production into a demand-driven, knowledge-based, high tech industry (pp. 152–165). London: Springer.
Zingraff, R. (1991). Facing extinction? In J. Leiter, M. Shulman, & R. Zingraff (Eds.), Hanging by a thread: Social change in southern textiles (pp. 199–216). New York: Cornell University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hodges, N.J., Link, A.N. (2018). Prescriptions for Growth for US Textile and Apparel Firms. In: Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 39. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68777-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68777-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68776-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68777-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)