Abstract
“Let the facts speak for themselves”; so runs an old but not very wise saying. For whoever just lets the facts speak for themselves will either be enveloped in silence or be deafened with the noise. That, at least, will be the thesis of this chapter.
Notes
- 1.
He did not merely inspect, he interacted: he was not content to appreciate the heart passively, he wished to tinker with it in every conceivable way.
- 2.
For further discussion of these and related developments see Singer (1950, 151–155 and 164–168).
- 3.
See also Hall (1966, ch. III).
- 4.
Paraphrase of Galileo’s Theorem II, Proposition II (1950, 167).
References
De Morgan, Augustus. 1915. A budget of paradoxes. Ed. D. E. Smith. Chicago: Open Court.
Galilei, Galileo. 1950. Dialogues concerning two new sciences. Trans. Henry Crew and Alfonso de Salvio. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Halliburton, W. D. and R. J. S. McDowall. 1939. Handbook of physiology and biochemistry, 36th ed. London: J. Murray.
Harvey, William. 1952. An anatomical disquisition on the motion of the heart and blood in animals. Trans. Robert Willis. In Great books of the western world, Vol. 28, ed. Robert Maynard Hutchins. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
Singer, Charles. 1950. A history of biology. New York: Henry Schuman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lund, M.D. (2018). Hypotheses Facta Fingunt. In: Lund, M.D. (eds) Perception and Discovery. Synthese Library, vol 389. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69745-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69745-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69744-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69745-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)