Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Aesthetic Style Can Influence Reception of Visual Communications of Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Climate Change Communication: Vol. 1

Part of the book series: Climate Change Management ((CCM))

Abstract

Public apathy on the issue of anthropogenic climate change is widespread, with more than half of surveyed Australians in denial that it is happening, and only 46% of Britons agreeing that humans are contributing significantly to the phenomenon. Successful communication of this complex issue is key to engagement, and much existing communication theory focuses on framing, rhetoric, fear and other high level strategies that can lead towards this aim. However, there is little understanding of how these messages and strategies are subsequently translated into designed visual communications (visual artefacts) for public consumption. This paper approaches these strategies and theories from a graphic design perspective, focussing on how the aesthetic style of visual artefacts—designed in line with these strategies—can influence their reception. The phenomenological research in this paper is taken from a larger study into the relationships between three selected real-world anthropogenic climate change visual artefacts, their production by graphic designers, and their reception by a set of viewers. A particular focus is the viewers’ interpretations of the “authority” behind each of the three visual artefacts, and how aesthetic style can influence this interpretation and consequently the trust and subscription to the message itself. This research makes a key contribution to climate change communication across fields such as science communication, sociology and graphic design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agid S (2011) How do we transition people from a system that doesn’t want to let them go?: social design and its political contexts. Des Philos Pap 9:187–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartmanski D (2015) Refashioning sociological imagination: linguality, visuality and the iconic turn in cultural sociology. Chin J Sociol 1:136–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AA (2010) The objects of affection: semiotics and consumer culture. Palgrave Macmillan, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1992) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ (2010) From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: environmental communication for civic engagement. Environ Commun J Nat Cult 4:82–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8:5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capstick SB, Demski CC, Sposato RG, et al (2015) Public perceptions of climate change in Britain following the winter 2013/2014 flooding. Understanding Risk Research Group Working Paper 15-01: Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole SJ (2010) Baudrillard’s ontology: empirical research and the denial of the real. Int J Baudrillard Stud 7:2

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hoog N, Stroebe W, de Wit JBF (2005) The impact of fear appeals on processing and acceptance of action recommendations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 31:24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foust CR, Murphy WOS (2009) Revealing and reframing apocalyptic tragedy in global warming discourse. Environ Commun J Nat Cult 3:151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel J, Dufour S, Fortin D (1993) Case study methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harden BG (2011) Nihilism and cultural cohesion:(Re) considerations of Jean Baudrillard. Int J Baudrillard Stud 8:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2008) The conquering of climate: discourses of fear and their dissolution. Geogr J 174:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joffe H (2008) The power of visual material: persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes 55:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (1982) Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney K, Scott LM (2003) A review of the visual rhetoric literature. In: Scott LM, Batra R (eds) Persuasive imagery: a consumer response perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey, USA, pp 17–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz DV (1996) Hegemony and anthropology: Gramsci, exegeses, reinterpretations. Critique Anthropol 16:103–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ Commun J Nat Cult 4:70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, et al (2015) Climate change in the American mind: March, 2015. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Leviston Z, Price J, Malkin S et al (2014) Fourth annual survey of Australian attitudes to climate change: Interim report. CSIRO, Perth, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Vaughan S (2013) The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat Clim Change 3:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loesberg J (1993) Bourdieu and the sociology of aesthetics. ELH 60:1033–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Change 17:445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKie D, Galloway C (2007) Climate change after denial: global reach, global responsibilities, and public relations. Public Relat Rev 33:368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, Califorinia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris E, Sayler S (2014) The pensive photograph as agent: what can non-illustrative images do to galvanize public support for climate change action? Image Polit Clim Change Visual Imaginations Documentations 55:299

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B (2010) Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 1:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Cole SA (2005) Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29:255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) Fear won’t do it, promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30:355–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (2006) How to lure analytic social science out of the doldrums: some lessons from comparative research. Int Sociol 21:633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regniez G, Custead S (2011) The role and effectiveness of governmental and non-governmental communications in engaging the public with climate change. In: Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S, Lorenzoni I (eds) Engaging the public with climate change. Earthscan, London, UK, pp 200–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G (2011) Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. Sage Publications Limited, Thousand Oaks, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki TR (2003) A new societist social ontology. Philos Soc Sci 33:174–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheufele DA, Tewksbury D (2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. J Commun 57:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirato T (1997) Between practice and structure: cultural literacy and Bourdieu’s notion of habitus. South Rev Commun Polit Cult 30:259–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirato T (1998) Commoditising communication skills. Aust J Commun 25:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott LM (1994) Images in advertising: the need for a theory of visual rhetoric. J Consum Res 21:252–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott LM, Batra R (2003) Persuasive imagery: a consumer response perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith NW, Joffe H (2009) Climate change in the British press: the role of the visual. J Risk Res 12:647–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelders D, Mugge R, Huinink M (2014) Using social distinctions in taste for analysing design styles across product categories. Int J Des 8:23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoyre A (2011) Social capital as a facilitator of pro-environmental actions in the USA: a preliminary examination of mechanisms. Local Environ 16:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkinwise C (2011) I ♥ Sustainability (because necessity no longer has agency). Des Philos Pap 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J (1978) Decoding advertisements: ideology and meaning in advertising. Marion Boyars, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UNSW Art & Design, F217G, Paddington Campus Cnr Oxford St & Greens Rd, Paddington, Sydney, NSW, 2021, Australia

    Rebecca Green

Authors
  1. Rebecca Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Green .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

  2. Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, Orestiada, Greece

    Evangelos Manolas

  3. Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Anabela Marisa Azul

  4. Department of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

    Ulisses M. Azeiteiro

  5. University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

    Henry McGhie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Green, R. (2018). How Aesthetic Style Can Influence Reception of Visual Communications of Climate Change. In: Leal Filho, W., Manolas, E., Azul, A., Azeiteiro, U., McGhie, H. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Communication: Vol. 1. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69838-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation