Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making Sense of Haptics

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems ((SSTHS))

  • 702 Accesses

Abstract

There are many environments in which it is not practical to do things with your own hands directly. For instance, it is not wise to enter a nuclear plant to perform device maintenance. In that case, it would be smarter to position robots inside the plant that can be directed by the maintenance worker outside of the plant. Another example is a keyhole procedure in surgery. In this procedure, instruments are inserted into a patient through tiny holes, to avoid large wounds in relatively simple procedures. The surgeon could use his own hands to guide the tools, but quite often, the surgeon actually uses a joystick to guide a robot to insert the tools, because this enables him to scale his movements to small and precise movements inside the patient. So, both the maintenance worker and the surgeon use teleoperation systems: systems consisting of a master, which is the interface (such as a joystick) that is used by a human (from now on called operator), and a slave, which is the robot that is performing the action in the remote environment (Srinivasan and Basdogan, Comput Graph 21(4):393–404, 1997). Obviously, there are large advantages to teleoperation techniques for the operators: the maintenance worker in the nuclear plant is not exposed to radiation and the surgeon has a far better view of his patient, because his hands are not in the way. However, there is also at least one large disadvantage to this technique: since the master and the slave device are usually not directly connected, the operator cannot directly feel what the slave is doing. When he would be performing the task with his own hands, he could have used sensory information from his hands, also called haptic perception, to feel what the slave is doing. To solve this problem, haptic feedback can be incorporated in the master device, which is the virtual equivalent of natural haptic information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbink DA, Mulder M, Boer ER (2012) Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority? Cogn Tech Work 14(1):19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann Tiest WM, Kappers AML (2014) Physical aspects of softness perception. Springer, London, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Jonge A, Wildenbeest J, Boessenkool H, Abbink D (2016) The effect of trial-by-trial adaptation on conflicts in haptic shared control for free-air teleoperation tasks. IEEE Trans Haptic 9(1):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Durlach N, Delhorne L, Wong A, Ko W, Rabinowitz W, Hollerbach J (1989) Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method. Percept Psychophys 46(1):29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hale KS, Stanney KM (2004) Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 24:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayward V, Astley OR, Cruz-Hernandez M, Grant D, Robles-De-La-Torre G (2004) Haptic interfaces and devices. Sens Rev 24(1):16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heit E (2000) Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychon Bull Rev 7(4):569–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones LA, Tan HZ (2013) Application of psychophysical techniques to haptic research. IEEE Tran Haptics 6(3):268–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimmig A (2013) Deductive reasoning. Springer, New York, pp 557–558

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (2003) Touch, vol 4. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New Jersey, chap 6, pp 147–176

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lederman SJ, Jones LA (2011) Tactile and haptic illusions. IEEE Trans Haptics 4:273–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL (2009) Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten Percept Psychophysics 71(7):1439–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loomis JM, Lederman SJ (1986) Tactual perception, chap 31. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance volume II: cognitive processes and performance. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marayong P, Okamura AM (2004) Speed-accuracy characteristics of human-machine cooperative manipulation using virtual fixtures with variable admittance. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 46(3):518–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nitsch V, Färber B (2013) A meta-analysis of the effects of haptic interfaces on task performance with teleoperation systems. IEEE Trans Haptics 6(4):387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pierce R, Kuchenbecker K (2012) A data-driven method for determining natural human-robot motion mappings in teleoperation. In: 4th IEEE RAS EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), pp 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  17. Proske U, Gandevia SC (2012) The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev 92(4):1651–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, Wolf P (2013) Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev 20(1):21–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989) Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 62(2):582–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivasan MA, Basdogan C (1997) Haptics in virtual environments: taxonomy, research status, and challenges. Comput Graph 21(4):393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stanney K (1995) Realizing the full potential of virtual reality: human factors issues that could stand in the way. In: Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS ’95), pp 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens S, Stone G (1959) Finger span: ratio scale, category scale, and JND scale. J Exp Psychol 57(2):91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Symmons M, Richardson B, Wuillemin D (2004) Active versus passive touch: superiority depends more on the task than the mode. In: Ballesteros S, Heller M (eds) Touch, blindness, and neuroscience. UNED Press, Madrid, pp 179–185

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan HZ, Pang XD, Durlach NI (1992) Manual resolution of length, force and compliance. In: Kazerooni H (ed) Advances in robotics, vol 42. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van der Helm PA (2010) Weber-Fechner behavior in symmetry perception? Atten Percept Psychophysics 72(7):1854–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vicentini M, Botturi D (2010) Perceptual issues improve haptic systems performance. In: Zadeh MH (ed) Advances in haptics. InTech, Vukovar

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weber E (1978/1834) De tactu. In: E.H. Weber on the tactile senses. Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis, Hove

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Beek, F.E. (2017). Introduction. In: Making Sense of Haptics. Springer Series on Touch and Haptic Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69920-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69920-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69919-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69920-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics