Skip to main content

Measuring Word Semantic Similarity Based on Transferred Vectors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10637))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Semantic similarity between words has now become a popular research problem to tackle in natural language processing (NLP) field. Word embedding have been demonstrated progress in measuring word similarity recently. However, limited to the distributional hypothesis, basic embedding methods generally have drawbacks in nature. One of the limitations is that word embeddings are usually by predicting a target word in its local context, leading to only limited information being captured. In this paper, we propose a novel transferred vectors approach to compute word semantic similarity. Transferred vectors are obtained via a reasonable combination of the source word and its nearest neighbors on semantic level. We conduct experiments on popular both English and Chinese benchmarks for measuring word similarity. The experiment results demonstrate that our method outperforms previous state-of-the-art by a large margin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mihalcea, R., Corley, C., Strapparava, C.: Corpus-based and knowledge-based measures of text semantic similarity. In: AAAI, pp. 775–780 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Islam, A., Inkpen, D.: ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 2(2), Article 10 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gao, J., Nie, J.-Y., Xun, E., Zhang, J., Zhou, M., Huang, C.: Improving query translation for cross-language information retrieval using statistical models. In: International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hassan, H., Hassan, A., Emam, O.: Unsupervised information extraction approach using graph mutual reinforcement. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cambria, E., Schuller, B., Xia, Y., Havasi, C.: New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Intell. Syst. IEEE 28(2), 15–21 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Y., McLean, D., Bandar, Z.A., O’shea, J.D., Crockett, K.: Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 18(8), 1138–1150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luong, M., Socher, R., Manning, C.: Better word representations with recursive neural networks for morphology. In: CoNLL-2013, pp. 104–113 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Turian, J., Ratinov, L., Bengio, Y.: Word representations: a simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. In: ACL 2010 Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 384–394 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Panchenko, A., Morozova, O., Naets, H.: A semantic similarity measure based on lexico-syntactic patterns. In: Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2012), Vienna (Austria), pp. 174–178 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, Y., Li, W.: Chinese word similarity measurement. NLPCC-ICCPOL 2016 shared task 3. In: Proceedings of NLPCC 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet. Wiley Online Library (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tian, J.L., Zhao, W.: Words similarity algorithm based on Tongyici Cilin in semantic web adaptive learning system. J. Jilin Univ. 28(06), 602–608 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mei, J.J., Zhu, Y.M., et al.: Tongyici Cilin. Shanghai Lexicon Publishing Company, Shanghai (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dong, Z., Dong, Q.: HowNet and the Computation of Meaning, pp. 85–95. World Scientific, Singapore (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Q., Li, S.: Word similarity computing based on HowNet. Comput. Linguist. Chin. Lang. Process. 7(2), 59–76 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Lang. Cogn. Process. 6, 1–28 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bengio, Y., Courville, A., Vincent, P.: Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35, 1798–1828 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hinton, G.E.: Learning distributed representations of concepts. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amherst, MA, pp. 1–12 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781, pp. 1–12 (2013)

  20. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Proceedings of NiPS, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levy, Q., Goldberg, Y.: Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2177–2185 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2014), ICML 2014, pp. 1188–1196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Iacobacci, I., Pilehvar, M.T., Navigli, R.: SensEmbed: learning sense embeddings for word and relational similarity. In: Proceeding of ACL, pp. 95–105 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M.: Feature embedding for dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, The 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 816–826 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nelder, J.A., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 308–313 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, K.: Research on Chinese FrameNet construction and application technologies. J. Chin. Inf. Process. 6, 47 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rubenstein, H., Goodenough, J.B.: Contextual correlates of synonymy. Commun. ACM 8(10), 627–633 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, E.H., Socher, R., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y.: Improving word representations via global context and multiple word prototypes. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changliang Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, C., Ma, T., Zhou, Y., Cheng, J., Xu, B. (2017). Measuring Word Semantic Similarity Based on Transferred Vectors. In: Liu, D., Xie, S., Li, Y., Zhao, D., El-Alfy, ES. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10637. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70093-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70093-9_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70092-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70093-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics