Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Automated Morphology Detection from Human Sperm Images

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

Abstract

Background: Sperm morphology is an important factor impacting male fertility potential. Thus, the assessment of this parameter is a key step during the infertility diagnosis and in real-time selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In recent years, one interesting subject in sperm morphology analysis (SMA) involves use of an automated algorithm. These algorithms can accelerate detection of typical and atypical forms. This chapter presents one of the most successful SMA algorithms for use in real-time analysis of human sperm selection. Methods: A human sperm morphology analysis dataset (HSMA-DS) was created using sperm images (n = 1457) from 235 patients. Different human sperm components were detected and analyzed using this SMA method. Initially, noise removal was performed to enhance image contrast followed by recognition and analysis of size and shape of different sperm regions (i.e., head, large vacuole, midpiece, and tail). Classification of each sperm was done by this algorithm as normal or abnormal forms. Therefore, the SMA algorithm recognizes the different atypical forms in the head, midpiece, and tail of a sperm. This analysis by the SMA algorithm is performed on non-stained images with low resolution.

Results: This method has the high ability to detect morphological abnormalities from archived sperm images. This yielded 90% accuracy to recognize sperm abnormalities with low computation time (i.e., less than 9 s). Therefore, embryologists can correctly and quickly select a suitable sperm among several analyzed sperms. Conclusion: The results of the proposed method found automatic and fast analysis of human sperm morphology can accelerate selection of best-morphology sperm selection for ICSI and improve assisted reproductive outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Isidori A, Latini M, Romanelli F. Treatment of male infertility. Contraception. 2005;72:314–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stouffs K, Tournaye H, Van der Elst J, Liebaers I, Lissens W. Is there a role for the nuclear export factor 2 gene in male infertility? Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1787–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz D, Overstreet J, Samuels S, Niswander P, Bloom T, Lewis E. Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male fertility. J Androl. 1986;7(4):203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO. World Health Organization—laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kobayashi T, Jinno M, Sugimura K, Nozawa S, Sugiyama T, Iida E. Sperm morphological assessment based on strict criteria and in-vitro fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(7):983–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blahova E, Machal J, Machal L, Milakovic I, Hanulakova S. Eliminating the effect of pathomorphologically formed sperm on resulting gravidity using the intracytoplasmic sperm injection method. Exp Ther Med. 2014;7:1000–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Abbiramy VS, Shanthi V. Spermatozoa segmentation and morphological parameter analysis based detection of teratozoospermia. Int J Comput Appl. 2010;3:19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Auger J. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics? Asian J Androl. 2010;12(1):36–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Babayev SN, Park CW, Bukulmez O. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection indications: how rigorous? Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:283–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lo Monte G, Murisier F, Piva I, Germond M, Marci R. Focus on intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI): a mini-review. Asian J Androl. 2013;15:608–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Menkveld R, Stander FS, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:586–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soler C, de Monserrat J, Gutiérrez R, Nuñez J, Nuñez M, Sancho M, et al. Use of the sperm-class analyzer for objective assessment of human sperm morphology. Int J Androl. 2003;26(5):262–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bijar A, Benavent AP, Mikaeili M, Khayati R. Fully automatic identification and discrimination of sperm’s parts in microscopic images of stained human semen smear. JBiSE. 2012;5:384–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sánchez L, Petkov N, Alegre E. Statistical approach to boar semen evaluation using intracellular intensity distribution of head images. Cell Mol Biol. 2007;52:38–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sánchez L, Petkov N, Alegre E. Statistical approach to boar semen head classification based on intracellular intensity distribution. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer analysis of images and patterns, CAIP, LNCS, vol 3691. 2005. p. 88–95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Otsu NA. Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet. 1979;9:62–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghasemian F, Mirroshandel SA, Monji-Azad S, Azarnia M, Zahiri Z. An efficient method for automatic morphological abnormality detection from human sperm images. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2015;122(3):409–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vandewoestyne M, Van Hoofstat D, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D. Automatic detection of spermatozoa for laser capture microdissection. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123:169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R, van der Horst G. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1369–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alegrea E, Biehl M, Petkov N, Sanchez L. Automatic classification of the acrosome status of boar spermatozoa using digital image processing and LVQ. Comput Biol Med. 2008;38:461–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li J, Tseng KK, Dong H, Li Y, Zhao M, Ding M. Human sperm health diagnosis with principal component analysis and K-nearest neighbor algorithm. In: IEEE in medical biometrics (ICMB), 2014 international conference on medical biometrics. 2014. p. 108–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chang V, Saavedra JM, Castañeda V, Sarabia L, Hitschfeld N, Härtel S. Gold-standard and improved framework for sperm head segmentation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2014;117(2):225–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vicente-Fiel S, Palacín I, Santolaria P, Yániz JL. A comparative study of sperm morphometric subpopulations in cattle, goat, sheep and pigs using a computer-assisted fluorescence method (CASMA-F). Anim Reprod Sci. 2013;139:182–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramos L, De Boer P, Meuleman EJ, Braat DD, Wetzels AM. Evaluation of ICSI-selected epididymal sperm samples of obstructive Azoospermic males by the CKIA system. J Androl. 2004;25:406–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yániz JL, Vicente-Fiel S, Capistrós S, Palacín I, Santolaria P. Automatic evaluation of ram sperm morphometry. Theriogenology. 2012;77:1343–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bellastella G, Cooper TG, Battaglia M, Ströse A, Torres I, Hellenkemper B, Soler C, Sinisi AA. Dimensions of human ejaculated spermatozoa in Papanicolaou-stained seminal and swim-upsmears obtained from the integrated semen analysis system (ISAS(®)). Asian J Androl. 2010;12:871–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rogowitz B, Pappas T, Daly S. Human vision and electronic imaging XII. In: SPIE. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibraheem NA, Hasan MM, Khan RZ, Mishra PK. Understanding color models: a review. ARPN J Sci Technol. 2012;2:265–75.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hamilton E. JPEG file interchange format. C-cube microsystems; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Graps A. An introduction to wavelets. In: Computational science engineering, IEEE. 1995. p. 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vincent OR, Folorunso O. A descriptive algorithm for sobel image edge detection. In: Proceedings of informing science & IT education conference (InSITE), vol 40. 2009. p. 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Park YS, Park S, Ko DS, Park DW, Seo JT, Yang KM. Observation of sperm-head vacuoles and sperm morphology under light microscope. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2014;41:132–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Han J, Kamber M, Pei J. Data mining: concepts and techniques: concepts and techniques. 3rd ed. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publisher; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mirroshandel SA, Ghasemian F, Monji-Azad S. Applying data mining techniques for increasing implantation rate by selecting best sperms for intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2016;137:215–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this study acknowledge the cooperation of the Guilan University of Medical Sciences (Rasht, Iran).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Guilan, Iran

    Seyed Abolghasem Mirroshandel

  2. Department of Biology, University of Guilan, Rasht, Guilan, Iran

    Fatemeh Ghasemian

Authors
  1. Seyed Abolghasem Mirroshandel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatemeh Ghasemian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Abolghasem Mirroshandel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA

    Gianpiero D. Palermo

  2. Center for Advanced Genetics, San Clemente, California, USA

    E. Scott Sills

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mirroshandel, S.A., Ghasemian, F. (2018). Automated Morphology Detection from Human Sperm Images. In: Palermo, G., Sills, E. (eds) Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70497-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70497-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70496-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70497-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation