Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY))

  • 1140 Accesses

Abstract

Artifacts, architecture and other remains of human use and adaptations to environmentally-defined landscapes are generally termed cultural landscapes. These are often buried and difficult to find and study, especially over broad areas. Geophysical tools, when accompanied by and correlated to information obtained from excavations is one way to expand knowledge of human activities over these large areas. Ground-penetrating radar can produce images in two and three-dimensions that define geological and anthropogenic units and features if those materials in the ground generate radar reflections from layer surfaces. The composition and extent of those materials is often discernable using magnetometer analysis, as that method produces images and discrete measurements of differences in the magnetic properties of some of the units that reflect radar energy. If the two methods are merged and evaluated in small areas first, where much can be determined about units and features of interest, this information can be projected over a wide area in order to understand broad natural landscapes and human activities in the past that occurred on and within them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker H (2015) Duo-and quadro-sensor configuration for high speed/high resolution magnetic prospecting with caesium magnetometer. Monum Sites 6:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno D, Julian T (2008) Landscape archaeology: introduction. In: Bruno D, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of landscape archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California, pp 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks J, Cook RA (2011) Beyond Squier and Davis: rediscovering Ohio’s earthworks using geophysical remote sensing. Am Antiq 76:667–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butzer KW (1971) Environment and Archeology: An Ecological Approach to Prehistory. Aldine Publications Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana S, Piro S (2008) Seeing the unseen. Geophysics and landscape archaeology. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Campana S, Dabas M, Marasco L, Piro S, Samuner D (2009) Integration of remote sensing, geophysical surveys and archaeological excavation for the study of a medieval mound (Tuscany, Italy). Archaeol Prospect 16:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (1995) The use of ground-penetrating radar to map the buried structures and landscape of the Ceren Site, El Salvador. Geoarchaeology 10:275–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (2006) Ground-penetrating Radar. In: Johnson JK (eds) Remote sensing in archaeology: a north american perspective. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, pp 131–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (2011) Discovery, mapping and interpretation of buried cultural resources non-invasively with ground-penetrating radar. J Geophys Eng 8:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (2012) Interpreting ground-penetrating radar for archaeology. Taylor and Francis Group, New York, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (2013) Ground-penetrating radar for archaeology, 3rd edn. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Alta Mira Press, Latham, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyers LB (2015) Analysis and interpretation of GPR datasets for integrated archaeological mapping: multiple GPR datasets for integrated archaeological mapping. J Near-Surface Geophys 31:2241–2262

    Google Scholar 

  • Creekmore A (2010) The structure of upper Mesopotamian cities: insight from fluxgate gradiometer survey at Kazane Höyük, southeastern Turkey. Archaeol Prospect 17:73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney C, Gater J (2003) Revealing the buried past: geophysics for archaeologists. Tempus Publishing, Stroud, U.K

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney C, Gaffney V, Neubauer W, Baldwin E, Chapman H, Garwood P, Moulden H, Sparrow T, Bates R, Löcker K, Hinterleitner A (2012) The Stonehenge hidden landscapes project. Archaeol Prospect 147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo D, Ciminale M, Becker HB, Masini N (2009) Remote sensing techniques for reconstructing a vast Neolithic settlement in Southern Italy. J Archaeol Sci 36:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JK, Haley BS (2004) Multiple sensor applications in archaeological geophysics. In: Meynart R, Neeck SP, Simoda H, Lurie JB, Aten ML (eds) Proceedings of SPIE, sensors, systems and next generation satellites VII, vol 5234. SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, pp 688–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Keay SJ, Parcak SH, Strutt KD (2014) High resolution space and ground-based remote sensing and implications for landscape archaeology: the case from Portus, Italy. J Archaeol Sci 52:277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme KL (2001) Current practices in archaeogeophyics. In: Earth sciences and archaeology. Springer, US, New York, pp 353–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme KL (2003) Geophysical surveys as landscape archaeology. Am Antiq 68:435–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme KL (2006) Integrating multidimensional geophysical data. Archaeol Prospect 13:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme KL, Ernenwein EG, Hargrave ML, Sever T, Harmon D, Limp F, Howell B, Koons M, Tullis J (2006) New approaches to the use and integration of multi-sensor remote sensing for historic resource identification and evaluation. Report of SERDP Project, SI-1263, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockyear K, Shlasko E (2016) Under the park. recent geophysical surveys at Verulamium St Albans, Hertfordshire, UK. Archaeol Prospect 24:17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piro S, Paolo M, Cammarano F (2000) Quantitative integration of geophysical methods for archaeological prospection. Archaeol Prospect 7:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarris A, Papadopoulos N, Agapiou A, Salvi MC, Hadjimitsis DG, Parkinson WA, Yerkes RW, Gyucha A, Duffy PR (2013) Integration of geophysical surveys, ground hyperspectral measurements, aerial and satellite imagery for archaeological prospection of prehistoric sites: the case study of Vésztő-Mágor Tell, Hungary. J Archaeol Sci 40:1454–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone JR, Schafer JP, Lond EH, DiGiacomo-Cohen ML, Lewis RS, Thompson WB (2005) Quaternary geologic map of Connecticut and long island sound basin. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Geological and Natural History Survey, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinks I, Johansson B, Gustafsson J, Emilsson J, Friborg J, Gustafsson C, Nissen J, Hinterleitner A (2010) Efficient, large-scale archaeological prospection using a true three-dimensional ground-penetrating radar array system. Archaeol Prospect 17:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonck L, Simpson D, Cornelis WM, Plyson A, Bourgeois J, Doctor R, van Meirvenne M (2009) Ground‐penetrating radar survey over bronze age circular monuments on a sandy soil, complemented with electromagnetic induction and fluxgate gradiometer data. Archaeol Prospect 16:193–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence B. Conyers .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Conyers, L.B. (2018). Introduction. In: Ground-penetrating Radar and Magnetometry for Buried Landscape Analysis. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70890-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics