Abstract
This chapter deals with the basic elements of the double constraint methodology (DCM). Since the DCM is an imaging method, while most parameter estimation methods are calibration methods, the difference is introduced in Sect. 3.1 and worked out in much greater depths in Sect. 3.9. Section 3.2 introduces the DCM in its most simple, intuitive form. To avoid presentation of three times the same equation for the three conductivity components in anisotropic media, we introduce the “voxel notation” in Sect. 3.3. Sections 3.4 and 3.5 present the theoretical justifications for the “intuitive DCM” presented in Sect. 3.2, while Sect. 3.6 discusses convergence and termination of the iterations. Section 3.7 presents some different approaches to handling anisotropy. Since the DCM is based on two models—the flux model and the head model—the rules for posing the correct boundary conditions for the two models are dealt with in Sect. 3.8.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aziz K, Settari A (1979) Petroleum reservoir simulation. Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London
Bossavit A (1998a) Computational Electromagnetism. Academic Press, Boston
Bossavit A (1998b) Computational electromagnetism and geometry. J Jpn Soc Appl Electromagn Mech 6:17–28, 114–123, 233–240, 318–326
Bossavit A (1999) Computational electromagnetism and geometry. J Jpn Soc Appl Electromagn Mech 7:150–159, 249–301, 401–408
Bossavit A (2000) Computational electromagnetism and geometry. J Jpn Soc Appl Electromagn Mech 8:102–109, 203–209, 372–377
Bossavit A (2005) Disctretization of electromagnetic problems: the “generalized finite difference approach”. In: Ciarlet PG (ed) Handbook of numerical analysis, vol XIII. Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam
Brouwer GK, Fokker PA, Wilschut F, Zijl W (2008) A direct inverse model to determine permeability fields from pressure and flow rate measurements. Math Geosci 40(8):907–920
Butkov E (1973) Mathematical Physics. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading
Chavent G (1987) On the uniqueness of local minima for general abstract non-linear least square problems. [Research report] RR-0645 <inria-00075908>. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00075908
Chen Y, Zhang D (2006) Data assimilation for transient flow in geologic formations via ensemble Kalman Filter. Adv Water Resour 29:1107–1122
Datta-Gupta A, Yoon S, Barman I, Vasco DW (1998) Streamline-based production data integration into high resolution reservoir models. J Pet Technol 50(12):72–76
Diersch HJG (2005) FEFLOW-Finite element subsurface flow and transport simulation system. WASY GmbH, Berlin, Germany
El-Rawy M (2013) Calibration of hydraulic conductivities in groundwater flow models using the double constraint method and the Kalman filter. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
El-Rawy M, Batelaan O, Zijl W (2015) Simple hydraulic conductivity estimation by the Kalman filtered double constraint method. Ground Water 53(3):401–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12217
Frankel T (2004) The geometry of physics, an introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York
Fry B, Wexler A (1995) US Patent 4,539,640, 3 Sept 1995
Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005, The US Geological Survey modular ground-water model, the ground-water flow process, techniques and methods. US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, p 6-A16
Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, The US Geological Survey modular ground-water model, user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 00–92. Reston, Virginia: USGS, p 121
Huisman L (1950) Resistance of clay-layer Amsterdam dune water catchment area (in Dutch). Amsterdam Water Supply Report
Kaasschieter EF (1990) Preconditioned conjugate gradients and mixed-hybrid finite elements for the solution of potential flow problems. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Kaasschieter EF, Huijben SJM (1992) Mixed-hybrid finite elements and streamline computation for the potential flow problem. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 8:221–266
Kohn RV, McKenney A (1990) Numerical implementation of a variational method for electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl 6:389–414
Kohn RV, Vogelius M (1987) Relaxation of a variational method for impedance computed tomography. Comm Pure Appl Math 40:745–777
MATLAB (2017) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA
Mohammed GA (2009) Modeling groundwater-surface water interaction and development of an inverse groundwater modeling methodology. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. http://twws6.vub.ac.be/hydr/download/GetachewAdemMohammed.pdf
Mohammed GA, Zijl W, Batelaan O, De Smedt F (2009a) Comparison of two mathematical models for 3D groundwater flow: block-centered heads and edge-based stream functions. Trans Porous Media 79(3):469–485
Mohammed GA, Zijl W, Batelaan O, De Smedt F (2009b) 3D stream function based Hydraulic Impedance Tomography. Presented at EGU general assembly 2009, Vienna, 19–24 April 2009: 5631, session HS3.5/A108, EGU 2009, vol 11 (2009). Geophysical research abstracts, vol 11, p 5631, European Geophysical Union (2009). http://www.google.com/search?q=egu+2009+5631+site:meetingorganizer.copernicus.org
Morse PM, Feshbach H (1953) Methods of theoretical physics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Naevdal G, Mannseth T, Vefring EH (2002) Near-well reservoir monitoring through Ensemble Kalman Filter. Paper SPE 75235 (9 pages), SPE/DOE improved oil recovery symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 13–17 April 2002
Narasimhan TN (2010) The discrete and the continuous: which comes first? Curr Sci 98(8):1003–1005
Nawalany M, Zijl W (2010) The velocity oriented approach revisited. XXXVIII IAH congress, groundwater quality sustainability, extended abstract 472, topic 5: data processing in hydrogeology, 5.2: groundwater flow and solute transport modelling, Krakow, Poland, 12–17 Sept 2010. Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego 441:113–122 (Geol Bull Pol Geol Inst 441:113–122)
Nelson RW (1960) In-place measurement of permeability in heterogeneous porous media 1: theory of a proposed method. J Geophys Res 65(6):1753–1758
Nelson RW (1961) In-place measurement of permeability in heterogeneous porous media 2: experimental and computational considerations. J Geophys Res 66(8):2469–2478
Nelson RW (1962) Conditions for determining areal permeability distribution by calculation. Soc Pet Eng J 2(3):223–224. https://doi.org/10.2118/371-PA
Nelson RW (1968) In-place determination of permeability distribution for heterogeneous porous media through analysis of energy dissipation. Soc Pet Eng J 8(1):33–42 http://www.onepetro.org/mslib/servlet/onepetropreview?id=00001554
Olsthoorn TN (1998) Groundwater modelling: calibration and the use of spreadsheets. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Peaceman DW (1977) Fundamentals of numerical reservoir simulation. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Shinbrod M (1973) Lectures on fluid mechanics. Gordon and Breach, New York
Tamburi A, Roeper U, Wexler A (1988) An application of impedance-computed tomography to subsurface imaging of pollution plumes. In: Collins AG, Johnson AI (eds) Ground-water contamination: field methods, ASTM Special Technical Publication 963, American Society for Testing and Materials, p 86–100
Trykozko A, Brouwer GK, Zijl W (2008) Downscaling: a complement to homogenization. Int J Num Anal Model 5:157–170
Trykozko A, Mohammed GA, Zijl W (2009) Downscaling: the inverse of upscaling. In: Conference on mathematical and computational issues in the geosciences, SIAM GS 2009, Leipzig, 15–18 June 2009
Trykozko A, Zijl W, Bossavit A (2001) Nodal and mixed finite elements for the numerical homogenization of 3D permeability. Comput Geosci 5:61–64
Van Leeuwen VCI (2005) A Matlab implementation of the edge-based face element method for forward and inverse modelling in the near-well region. M.Sc. thesis, Mathematical Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht
Webster JG (1990) Electrical impedance tomography. Adam Hilger, Bristol
Wexler A (1988) Electrical impedivity imaging in two and three dimensions. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 9(Suppl A):29–33
Wexler A, Fry B, Neuman MR (1985) Impedivity computed tomography algorithm and system. Appl Opt 24(23):3985–3992
Yeh WWG (1986) Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: the inverse problem. Water Resour Res 22(2):95–108
Yorkey TJ, Webster JG (1987) A comparison of impedivity topographic reconstruction algorithms. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 8:55–62
Yorkey TJ, Webster JG, Tompkins WJ (1987) Comparing reconstruction algorithms for electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 34:843–852
Zijl W (2004) A direct method for the identification of the permeability field based on flux assimilation by a discrete analog of Darcy’s law. Transp Porous Med 56:87–112
Zijl W (2005a) Face-centered and volume-centered discrete analogs of the exterior differential equations governing porous medium flow I: theory. Transp Porous Med 60:109–122
Zijl W (2005b) Face-centered and volume-centered discrete analogs of the exterior differential equations governing porous medium flow II: examples. Transp Porous Med 60:123–133
Zijl W (2007) Forward and inverse modeling of near-well flow using discrete edge-based vector potentials. Transp Porous Med 67:115–133
Zijl W, Mohammed GA, Batelaan O, De Smedt F (2010) Constraining methods for direct inverse modeling. XVIII international conference on water resources, CMWR, CIMNE, Barcelona. http://congress.cimne.com/cmwr2010/Proceedings/docs/p62.pdf
Zijl W, Nawalany M (2004) The edge-based face element method for 3D-stream function and flux calculations in porous media flow. Transp Porous Med 55:361–382
Zijl W, Trykozko A (2001) Numerical homogenization of the absolute permeability using the conformal-nodal and mixed-hybrid finite element method. Transp Porous Med 44:33–62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zijl, W., De Smedt, F., El-Rawy, M., Batelaan, O. (2018). The Pointwise Double Constraint Methodology. In: The Double Constraint Inversion Methodology. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71342-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71342-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71341-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71342-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)