Abstract
A vast literature on urban sustainable development and sustainability recounts local place-based actions as best practices, and not seldom rests on examples in Europe. Not seldom, however, these recipe-oriented instructions overlook specific sociopolitical and economic conditions that would hinder policy transfer of sustainability initiatives. Also, while the maxim small is beautiful is repeated, rarely are the network of spaces and flows that constitute those small places considered. Small states exemplify this situation and contradiction. This chapter presents the case of post-suburban Luxembourg—a small sovereign state—that under growth pressure has developed an urban morphology that is profoundly dependent on international, cross-borders flows. It is a place where policy-makers need to rethink the orthodoxies of sustainability and find new ways to address these challenges.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Further Reading
Affolderbach, J. 2013. Negotiating Border Regions. Retail Development in Luxembourg and the Greater Region. In Theorizing Borders, ed. P. Gilles, H. Koff, C. Maganda, and C. Schulz. Brussels: P. I. E. Lang.
Affolderbach, J., and C. Carr. 2016. Blending Scales of Governance: Land-Use Policies and Practices in the Small State of Luxembourg. Regional Studies 50 (6): 944–955.
Barnes, T.J., and C. Minca. 2013. Nazi Spatial Theory: The Dark Geographies of Carl Schmitt and Walter Christaller. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (3): 669–687.
Becker, T., and M. Hesse. 2010. Internationalisierung und Steuerung internationaler Wohnungsmärkte–das Beispiel Luxemburg. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 5 (6): 403–415.
Born, B., and M. Purcell. 2006. Avoiding the Local Trap, Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26 (2): 195–207.
Burdack, J., and M. Hesse. 2007. Suburbanisation, Suburbia and “Zwischenstadt”: Perspectives of Research and Policy. In Territorial Cohesion, ed. D. Scholich, 81–100. Berlin: German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy.
Carr, C. 2013. Discourse Yes, Implementation Maybe: An Immobility and Paralysis of Sustainable Development Policy. European Planning Studies 22 (9): 1824–1840.
Carr, C., and J. Affolderbach. 2014. Rescaling Sustainability? Local Opportunities and Scalar Contradictions. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 19 (6): 567–571.
Carr, C., and E. McDonough. 2016. Integrative Planning of Post-Suburban Growth in the Glatt Valley (Switzerland). Raumforschung und Raumordnung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0403-x.
Carr, C., T. Becker, E. Evrard, B. Nienaber, U. Roos, E. McDonough, M. Hesse, and R. Krueger. 2015. Raising Sustainability/Mobilising Sustainability: Why European Sustainable Urban Development Initiatives Are Slow to Materialise/Territorial Cohesion as a Vehicle of Sustainability/Sustainable Urban Development and the Challenge of Global Air Transport Nodes and Spatial Integration/Distorted Density: Where Developers and Non-Governmental Organizations on Sustainable Urban Development Agree/Overcoming Politics with Markets? The Co-production of Sustainable Development in Urban and Regional Planning. Planning Theory & Practice 16 (1): 99–125.
Charmes, E., and R. Keil. 2015. The Politics of Post-Suburban Densification in Canada and France. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (3): 581–602.
Doerr, J., and C. Carr. 2014. Dreizig Jahre Transformation und trotzdem noch ganz am Anfang? Der Wandel in Beckerich von der Agenda 21 zur Transition Town. Planung Neu Denken 3: 1–7.
European Commission. 2011. Demography Report 2010. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
Frey, W. 2011. Freiburg Green City: Approaches to Sustainable Urban Development. Freiburg: Herder.
Hesse, M. 2016. On Borrowed Size, Flawed Urbanisation and Emerging Enclave Spaces: The Exceptional Urbanism of Luxembourg. Luxembourg European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (4): 541–555.
Keil, R., and J.D. Addie. 2015. It’s Not Going to Be Suburban, It’s Going to Be All Urban: Assembling Post-suburbia in the Toronto and Chicago Regions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (5): 892–911.
Knox, P.L., and H. Mayer. 2009. Small Town Sustainability: Economic, Social, and Environmental Innovation. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Krueger, R., and D. Gibbs, eds. 2007. The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe. New York: The Guilford Press.
McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2010. Relationality/Territoriality: Toward a Conception of Cities in the World. Geoforum 41: 175–184.
McLean, B.L., and T. Borén. 2015. Barriers to Implementing Sustainability Locally: A Case Study of Policy Immobilities. Local Environment 20 (12): 1489–1506.
Newman, P. 2014. Rediscovering Compact Cities for Sustainable Development. In Elgar Companion to Sustainable Cities: Strategies, Methods and Outlook, ed. D.A. Mazmann and H. Blanco. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Niedermeyer, M., and P. Moll. 2007. SaarLorLux – Vom Montandreieck Zur “Großregion”. In 50 Jahre Saarland Im Wandel, ed. H.P.P. Dörrenbächer, O. Kühne, and J.M.M. Wagner, 297–321. Saarbrücken: IfLiS.
Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2001. Exporting Workfare/Importing Welfare-to-Work: Exploring the Politics of Third Way Policy Transfer. Political Geography 20 (4): 427–460.
Phelps, N.A., and A.M. Wood. 2011. The New Post-Suburban Politics? Urban Studies 48 (12): 2591–2610.
Rowe, P.G. 1991. Making a Middle Landscape. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rydin, Y. 2010. Governing for Sustainable Urban Development. London: Earthscan.
Sieverts, T. 2003. Cities Without Cities: An Interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. London: Routledge.
Temenos, C., and E. McCann. 2012. The Local Politics of Policy Mobility: Learning, Persuasion, and the Production of a Municipal Sustainability Fix. Environment and Planning A 44 (6): 1389–1406.
Vidal, M., and M. Niedermeyer. 2011. Le Développement Territorial et sa Dimension Transfrontalière: Expériences Du Luxembourg et de la Grande Région. In Raumordnung in Luxemburg / Aménagement Du Territoire Au Luxembourg, ed. T. Chilla and C. Schulz, 296–316. Luxembourg: Binsfeld.
Wachsmuth, D. 2014. City as Ideology: Reconciling the Explosion of the City Form with the Tenacity of the City Concept. Environment and Planning D 32 (1): 75–90.
Wachsmuth, D., D.A. Cohen, and H. Angelo. 2016. Expand the Frontiers of Urban Sustainability. Nature 536: 391–393.
Wheeler, S.M., and T. Beatley. 2008. Sustainable Urban Development Reader. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carr, C. (2018). Sustainability in Small States: Luxembourg as a Post-suburban Space Under Growth Pressure in Need of a Cross-National Sustainability. In: Brinkmann, R., Garren, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71389-2_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71389-2_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71388-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71389-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)