Skip to main content

Teaching for Tomorrow: Preparing Responsible Citizens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disciplining the Undisciplined?

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1162 Accesses

Abstract

The complicity of business schools in corporate wrong-doing has long been receiving public attention (Orr 1994), especially in more recent years following the collapse of companies like Enron, Tyco and WorldCom and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (Crane and Matten 2016). Perceptions of widespread corporate malfeasance have triggered growing calls—inter alia—for a greater emphasis on ethics in management education (Swanson and Frederick 2003; Alsop 2006; Crane 2004; Cornelius et al. 2007). Further compounding the moral dilemma of business schools are mounting socio-ecological problems globally, which have at their core the very economic model enshrined in business curricula world-wide (Willard 2004; Hart 2007; von der Heidt and Lamberton 2011; Godemann et al. 2014). Thus, places of higher education, and business schools in particular (especially since they attract the largest student numbers) are called upon not only to help students build their ethical identities (Swanson and Dahler-Larsen 2008), but also to equip them with the requisite tools to become earth-literate future leaders (after Martin and Jucker 2005) able to navigate and manage the complex challenges that have come to characterise this era (Lozano et al. 2015) we tellingly call the Anthropocene (see Steffen et al. 2011). It is considered a moral imperative but also a question of social relevance that business schools uphold their identity as places of learning with a conscience and purpose; driving positive social change by way of informing and shaping managerial and professional attitudes and practices (Adams et al. 2011; José Chiappetta Jabbour 2010; Tilbury et al. 2004; Green et al. 2017). As suggested by Setó-Pamies and Papaoikonomou (2016: 524):

Academic institutions help shape the attitudes and behaviour of business leaders through business education, research, management development programs, training, and other pervasive, but less tangible, activities, such as the spread and advocacy of new values and ideas. Through these means, academic institutions have the potential to generate a wave of positive change, thereby helping to ensure a world where both enterprises and societies can flourish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman RW (1973) How companies respond to social demands. Harv Bus Rev 51(4):88–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams CA, Heijltjes MG, Jack G, Marjoribanks T, Powell M (2011) The development of leaders able to respond to climate change and sustainability challenges: the role of business schools. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 2(1):165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn S, Solarz B (2006) The autistic economist. Post-Autistic Econ Rev 38:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsop RJ (2006) Business ethics education in business schools: a commentary. J Manag Educ 30(1):11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras G, Crowther D (2015) Sustainable practice: the real triple bottom line. In: Crowther D (ed) The governance of risk. Emerald, London, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnsperger C, Varoufakis Y (2006) What is neoclassical economics? Post-Autistic Econ Rev 38:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora R (2016) Enhancement in employee skills and benefits to employees and organization with respect to CSR Initiatives. JIM Quest 12(2):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government (2012) Australia in the Asian century. White Paper. Department of Defence, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres RU, van den Bergh JC, Gowdy JM (2001) Strong versus weak sustainability economics, natural sciences, and “consilience”. Environ Ethics 23(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee SB (2006) The problem with corporate social responsibility. In: Clegg S, Rhodes C (eds) Management ethics: what is to be done? Palgrave, New York, pp 55–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Basagio AD (1995) Methods of defining sustainability. Sustain Dev 3(3):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman W (1992) Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? World Dev 20(4):481–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman W (1995) How would you like your ‘sustainability’, sir? Weak or strong? A reply to my critics. Environ Value 4:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman W (2002) A poverty of reason. Sustainable development and economic growth. The Independent Institute, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekessy S, Samson K, Clarkson R (2007) The failure of non-binding declarations to achieve university sustainability: a need for accountability. Int J Sustain High Educ 8(3):301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bice S (2017) Corporate social responsibility as institution: a social mechanisms framework. J Bus Ethics 143(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield M (2005) Corporate social responsibility – the failing discipline and why it matters for international relations. Int Relat 19(2):173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blyth A (2005) Business behaving responsibly. Director 59(1):30

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HR (1953) Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers CA (1995) Educating for an ecologically sustainable culture: rethinking moral education, creativity, intelligence, and other modern orthodoxies. Suny Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley D, Noonan P, Nugent H, Scales B (2009) Review of Australian higher education—final report. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt W (1980) North-South: a programme for survival. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Brembs B, Button K, Munafo M (2013) Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Front Hum Neurosci 7(Article 291):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner M (2017) Coming back from the brink: towards a critical, post-autistic approach to economics for sustainability. In: Brueckner M, Spencer R, Paull M (eds) Disciplining the undisciplined? Perspectives from business, society and politics on responsible citizenship, corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner M, Spencer R, Paull M, Girardi A, Klomp S (2017) Journeying towards responsible citizenship and sustainability. In: Arevalo JA, Mitchell SF (eds) Handbook of sustainability in management education: in search of a multidisciplinary, innovative and integrated approach. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 364–384

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AB, Buchholtz AK (2009) Business & society. Ethics and stakeholder management. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CMA (2014) History versus equilibrium revisited: rethinking neoclassical economics as the foundation of business education. J Educ Bus 89(4):207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohan JA (2002) ‘I didn’t know’ and ‘i was only doing my job’: has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of enron’s information myopia. J Bus Ethics 40:275–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commoner B (1971) The closing circle. Nature, man and technology. Alfred Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2009) Living sustainably. The Australian government’s national action plan for education for sustainability. Department of Environment, Water, Heritage & Arts, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell R (2013) The neoliberal cascade and education: an essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Crit Stud Educ 54(2):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell R (2015) Australian universities under neoliberal management: the deepening crisis. Internet High Educ 81:23–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell R (2016) What are good universities? Aust Univ Rev 58(2):67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly S (2007) Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environ 12(3):259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper S, Poletti A (2011) The new ERA of journal ranking. The consequences of Australia’s fraught encounter with ‘quality’. Aust Univ Rev 53(1):57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper S, Parkes C, Blewitt J (2014) Can accreditation help a leopard change its spots? Social accountability and stakeholder engagement in business schools. Account Audit Account J 27(2):234–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius N, Wallace J, Tassabehji R (2007) An analysis of corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and ethics teaching in business schools. J Bus Ethics 76(1):117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese AD (2003) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan High Educ 31(3):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane FG (2004) The teaching of business ethics: an imperative at business schools. J Educ Bus 79(3):149–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane A, Matten D (2016) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (1990) Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecol Econ 2:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly HE (2002) Sustainable development: definitions, principles, policies. Invited address to World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz S (1996) Describing differences in process to organization science: rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organ Sci 7(2):191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesendorf M (1997) Principles of ecological sustainability. In: Diesendorf M, Hamilton C (eds) Human ecology, human economy. Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (1996) Environmental sustainabilities: an analysis and a typology. Environ Polit 5:401–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson IR (2011) A new ERA? Or a return to the dark ages? NTEU Advocate 18(1):24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh JP, Tashman P (2014) Half a world away: the integration and assimilation of corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and sustainable development in business school curricula. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 21(3):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker P (1954) The principles of management. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS (1997) The politics of the earth. Environmental discourses. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman (2017) Edelman trust barometer – Global results. http://www.edelman.com/. Accessed 8 June 2017

  • Ehrlich P (1970) The population bomb. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis N (2017) Transdisciplinary perspectives on responsible citizenship, corporate social responsibility and sustainability. In: Brueckner M, Spencer R, Paull M (eds) Disciplining the undisciplined? Perspectives from business, society and politics on responsible citizenship, corporate social responsibility and sustainability. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley HM, Smith ZA (2014) Sustainability. If it’s everything, is it nothing? Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J, Bonn I (2011) Business sustainability and undergraduate management education: an Australian study. High Educ 62(5):563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick WC (1994) From CSR1 to CSR2. Bus Soc 33(2):150–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fressoz J-B, Bonneuil C (2017) Growth unlimited. The idea of infinite growth from fossil capitalism to capitalism. In: Borowy I, Schmelzer M (eds) History of the future of economic growth: historical roots of current debates on sustainable degrowth. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 52–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlick S, Matthews J (2014) University responsibility in a world of environemntal catastrophe: cognitive justice, engagement and an ethic of care in learning. In: Inman P, Robinson DL (eds) University engagement and environmental sustainability. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 9–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings B, Hopwood B, O’Brien G (2002) Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustain Dev 10(4):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux HA (2014) Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Haymarket Books, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux HA (2015) Against the terror of neoliberalism: politics beyond the age of greed. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin TN, Kennelly JJ, Krause T-S (1995) Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):874–907

    Google Scholar 

  • Godemann J, Haertle J, Herzig C, Moon J (2014) United Nations supported principles for responsible management education: purpose, progress and prospects. J Clean Prod 62(0):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green R, Berti M, Sutton N (2017) Higher education in management: the case of Australia. In: Dameron S, Durand T (eds) The future of management education. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 117–137

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J (2010) Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna MD (1995) Environmentally responsible managerial behavior: is ecocentrism a prerequisite? Acad Manag Rev 20(4):796–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL (2007) Capitalism at the crossroads: aligning business, earth, and humanity. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Haski-Leventhal D, Concato J (2016) The state of CSR and RME in business schools and the attitudes of their students. Third bi-annual study, 2016. Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill D, Kumar R (2012) Global neoliberalism and education and its consequences. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood B, Mellor M, O’Brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13(1):38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (1980) Caring for the earth: a strategy for sustainable living. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Issa T, Pick D (2016) Teaching business ethics post GFC: a corporate social responsibility. In: Jamali D (ed) Comparative perspectives on global corporate social responsibility. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 290–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs M (1991) The green economy: environment, sustainable development and the politics of the future. Pluto Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonson EP, McGuire LM, O’Neill D (2015) Teaching ethics to undergraduate business students in Australia: comparison of integrated and stand-alone approaches. J Bus Ethics 132(2):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • José Chiappetta Jabbour C (2010) Greening of business schools: a systemic view. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jucker R (2002) Sustainability? Never heard of it! Some basics we shouldn’t ignore when engaging in education for sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 3(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn R (2010) Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, & planetary crisis: the ecopedagogy movement. Peter Lang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana R, Spender JC (2012) Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: more than ‘a problem in organizational design’. J Manag Stud 49(3):619–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiron D, Kruschwitz N, Reeves M, Goh E (2013) The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 54(2):69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps DM (1997) Economics: the current position. Daedalus 126(1):59–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach M, Raworth K, Rockström J (2013) Between social and planetary boundaries: navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity. In: ISSC/UNESCO (ed) World social science report 2013: changing global environments. UNESCO Publishing, Paris, pp 84–89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho W (2000) Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 1(1):9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee M-DP (2008) A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. Int J Manag Rev 10(1):53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard P, McLaren P (2002) Paulo Freire: a critical encounter. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilley K, Barker M, Harris N (2014) Educating global citizens in business schools. J Int Educ Bus 7(1):72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie A, Willmott H (2009) Accreditation sickness in the consumption of business education: the vacuum in AACSB standard setting. Manag Learn 40(4):411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano R, Ceulemans K, Alonso-Almeida M, Huisingh D, Lozano FJ, Waas T, Lambrechts W, Lukman R, Huge J (2015) A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. J Clean Prod 108(Part A):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumley S, Armstrong P (2004) Some of the nineteenth century origins of the sustainability concept. Environ Dev Sustain 6:367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydenberg S (2005) Corporations and the public interest: guiding the invisible hand. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Jucker R (2005) Educating earth-literate leaders. J Geogr High Educ 29(1):19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy DD (2003) Post-normal governance: an emerging counter-proposal. Environment 31(1):79

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna R, Tsahuridu E (2001) Must managers leave ethics at home? Economics and moral anomie in business organisations. Reason Pract 1(3):67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D, Meadows D, Randers J, Behrens W (1972) The limits to growth: a report to the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Pan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic M, Pestel E (1974) Mankind at the turning point. The second report to the club of Rome. Club of Rome, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier N (2005) Introduction to sustainability. Road to a better future. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Munilla LS, Miles MP (2005) The corporate social responsibility continuum as a component of stakeholder theory. Bus Soc Rev 110(4):371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer E (1999) Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu R, Prahalad C, Rangaswami M (2015) Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. IEEE Eng Manag Rev 43(2):85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okoye A (2009) Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: is a definition necessary? J Bus Ethics 89(4):613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2011) Towards green growth. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Orltizky M (2005) Payoffs to social and environmental performance. J Invest 14(3):48–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr DW (1992) Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. Suny Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr DW (ed) (1994) Earth in mind. On education, environment and the human prospect. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer J, Cooper I, van der Vorst R (1997) Mapping out fuzzy buzzwords – who sits where on sustainability and sustainable development. Sustain Dev 5:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paton GJ (2010) Seeking sustainability: on the prospect of an ecological liberalism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton D, Siegel DS (2005) The economics of corporate social responsibility: an overview of the special issue. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 16:309–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D, Atkinson G (1995) Measuring sustainable development. In: Bromley DW (ed) Handbook of environmental economics. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen ER (2006) Making corporate social responsibility operable: how companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Bus Soc Rev 112(2):137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. HBR Spotlight. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey A, Balick MJ (eds) (2006) Human impacts on Amazonia. The role of ecological knowledge in conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee Z, Rezaee N, Homayoun S (2016) Integration of business sustainability education into the business curriculum. Int J Financ Manag Account 1(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (2003) The manufacture of corporate social responsibility. Organization 10:249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roosa SA (2008) Sustainable development handbook, 2nd edn. The Fairmont Press, Lilburn

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundle-Thiele SR, Wymer W (2010) Stand-alone ethics, social responsibility, and sustainability course requirements: a snapshot from Australia and New Zealand. J Mkt Eudc 32(1):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarre R, Doig M, Fiedler B (2001) Reducing the risk of corporate irresponsibility: the trend to corporate social responsibility. Account Forum 25(3):300–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott G, Tilbury D, Sharp L, Deane E (2012) Turnaround leadership for sustainability in higher education. University of Western Sydney, Australian National University & Sustainable Futures Leadership Academy, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi SP (1975) Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytical framework. Calif Manag Rev 17(3):58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setó-Pamies D, Papaoikonomou E (2016) A multi-level perspective for the integration of ethics, corporate social responsibility and sustainability (ECSRS) in management education. J Bus Ethics 136(3):523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore C (2010) Beyond the multiversity: neoliberalism and the rise of the schizophrenic university. Soc Anthropol 18(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1995) Ecocentric management for a risk society. Acad Manag Rev 20(1):118–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1996) Ecocentric versus traditional management: some hints to hanna. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidiropoulos E (2014) Education for sustainability in business education programs: a question of value. J Clean Prod 85:472–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum P (2008) Understanding sustainability economics: towards pluralism in economics. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1992) An almost practical step towards sustainability. Invited lecture on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of Resources for the Future (8th October). Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector B (2008) Business responsibilities in a divided world: the cold war roots of the corporate social responsibility movement. Enterp Soc 9(2):314–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Springett D (2005) Education for sustainability’ in the business studies curriculum: a call for a critical agenda. Bus Strateg Environ 14(3):146–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc 369:842–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2009) A blueprint for a safer planet: how to manage climate change and create a new era of progress and prosperity. Random House, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stibbe A (2009) The handbook of sustainability literacy: skills for a changing world. Green Books, Dartington

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs W, Cocklin C (2008) Teaching sustainability to business students: shifting mindsets. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(3):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturdivant FD, Ginter JL (1977) Corporate social responsiveness: management attitudes and economic performance. Calif Manag Rev 19(3):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson DL, Dahler-Larsen P (2008) Toward an ethical sense of self for business education. In: Swanson DL, Fisher DG (eds) Advancing business ethics education. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 191–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson DL, Frederick WC (2003) Campaign AACSB: are business schools complicit in corporate corruption. J Individ Employ Rights 10(2):151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas I (2004) Sustainability in tertiary curricula: what is stopping it happening. Int J Sustain High Educ 5(1):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney WG (2009) Globalization, international rankings, and the American model: a reassessment. High Educ Forum 6(March):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilbury D, Crawley C, Berry F (2004) Education about and for sustainability in Australian business schools. Report prepared by the Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability (ARIES) and Arup Sustainability for the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage. Macquarie University, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (1972) Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (2012) Global environment outlook 5. Environment for the future we want. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Heidt T, Lamberton G (2011) Sustainability in the undergraduate and postgraduate business curriculum of a regional university: a critical perspective. J Manag Org 17(5):670–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will M, Ryden L (2015) Trans-disciplinarity in sustainability science and education. In: Leal Filho W, Brandli L, Kuznetsova O, Paço AMF (eds) Integrative approaches to sustainable development at university level. Springer, Cham, pp 687–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard B (2004) Teaching sustainability in business schools. In: Galea C (ed) Teaching business sustainability. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 268–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, McKiernan P (2011) Global mimicry: putting strategic choice back on the business school agenda. Br J Manag 22(3):457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) Inclusive green growth. The pathway to sustainable development. World Bank, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (1999) Corporate social responsbility: meeting changing expectations. WBCSD, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldwatch Institute (2016) State of the world 2016. Can a city be sustainable? WWI, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Young S, Nagpal S (2013) Meeting the growing demand for sustainability-focused management education: a case study of a PRME academic institution. High Educ Res Dev 32(3):493–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Brueckner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brueckner, M., Spencer, R., Paull, M. (2018). Teaching for Tomorrow: Preparing Responsible Citizens. In: Brueckner, M., Spencer, R., Paull, M. (eds) Disciplining the Undisciplined?. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71449-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics