Abstract
Background and Significance of the topic: This chapter contributes to the documentation of novel network-based resilience concepts to socio-ecological systems. Although the resilience concept has been studied in depth in ecological systems, it surely has relevance outside this area and in recent years has been a main domain of study for socioeconomic systems. This chapter provides an overview of the application of resilience concepts in ecology, with a particular focus on the application of two methods developed using ecological network analysis. Methodology: The first method uses information-theory based network analysis to ascertain the trade-off between efficiency and redundancy in networks (in terms of the structure and flows). The second method uses an energy-flow based method to assess keystoneness and the direct and indirect relations in the networks. Application/Relevance to systems analysis: Earlier work using information-theory based network analysis has shown that ecological systems display a robust balance between efficiency and redundancy in networks (in terms of the structure and flows) thereby bestowing them with robust and resilient features. Results indicate that a dam ecosystem in southwest China falls just short of the optimum but suffers substantial loss of robustness when the phytoplankton community is perturbed. Application to a virtual water network shows the system is not near the robustness peak. Using the energy-flow based method, a South African estuary showed alteration of the keystone species depending on the seasonality; a land use change model of Beijing showed a decrease in mutualism due to urban expansion. Policy and/or practice implications: The case studies presented illustrate the application of ecological network analysis. Positive and negative relations between sectors of ecosystems or economic systems highlight the influence of various species and economies on one another, resulting in a comprehensive picture of relations, impacts and therefore management options to achieve balance between sectors. Discussion and conclusion: Overall, networks provided a useful model to illustrate system resilience measures, and other system analysis methods of direct and indirect impacts of system components on each other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Admiraal, J. F., Wossink, A., De Groot, W. T., & De Snoo, G. R. (2013). More than total economic value: How to combine economic valuation of biodiversity with ecological resilience. Ecological Economics, 89, 115–122.
Allesina, S., & Pascual, M. (2008). Network structure, predator—prey modules, and stability in large food webs. Theoretical ecology, 1, 55–64.
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765–781.
Chapin IIIi, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., Mack, M.C., & DÃaz, S. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 235–242.
Chen, S., Fath, B. D., Chen, B. (2011). Information-based network environ analysis: A system perspective for ecological risk assessment. Ecological Indicators, 11(6), 1664–1672.
Chen, X., & Cohen, J. E. (2001). Transient dynamics and food-web complexity in the Lotka-Volterra cascade model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 268, 869–877.
Cheng, G. D., Xiao, H. L., Xu, Z. M., Li, J. X., & Lu, M. F. (2006). Water issue and its counter-measure in the inland river basins of Northwest China—a case study in Heihe River Basin. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 3, 406–413.
Christensen, V., & Walters, C. J. (2004). Ecopath with ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecological Modelling, 172, 109–139.
Chrystal, R. A., & Scharler, U. M. (2014). Network analysis indices reflect extreme hydrodynamic conditions in a shallow estuarine lake (Lake St Lucia), South Africa. Ecological indicators, 38, 130–140.
Denman, K. L., Brasseur, G., Chidthaisong, A., Ciais, P., Cox, P. M., Dickinson, R. E., Hauglustaine, D., Heinze, C., Holland, E., Jacob, D., Lohmann, U., Ramachandran, S., da Silva Dias, P. L., Wofsy, S. C., & Zhang, X. (2007). Couplings between changes in the climate system and biogeochemistry. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z.-I., Knowler, D. J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R. J., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J., Sullivan, C.A. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity : Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 81(2), 163–182.
Elliott, M., & Quintino, V. (2007). The estuarine quality paradox, environmental homeostasis and the difficulty of detecting anthropogenic stress in naturally stressed areas. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54, 640–646.
Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., & Walker, B. (2003). Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 488–494.
Elton, C. S. (1958). Ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Chapman & Hall.
Fang, D., Fath, B. D., Chen, B., & Scharler, U. M. (2014). Network environ analysis for socio-economic water system. Ecological indicators, 47, 80–88.
Fath, B. (1998). Network synergism: Emergence of positive relations in ecological systems. Ecological Modelling, 107, 127–143.
Fath, B. D., Scharler, U., Ulanowicz, R. E., & Hannon, B. (2007). Ecological network analysis: network construction. Ecological Modelling, 208, 49–55.
Fath, B. D., Dean, C. A., & Katzmair, H. (2015). Navigating the adaptive cycle: An approach to managing the resilience of social systems. Ecology and Society, 20(2), 24.
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social—ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., et al. (2004). Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, 557–581.
Gamfeldt, L., & Hillebrand, H. (2008). Biodiversity effects on aquatic ecosystem functioning—maturation of a new paradigm. International Review of Hydrobiology, 93, 550–564.
Goerner, S. J., Lietaer, B., & Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009). Quantifying economic sustainability: Implications for free-enterprise theory, policy and practice. Ecological Economics, 69, 76–81.
Grilli, J., Rogers, T., & Allesina, S. (2016). Modularity and stability in ecological communities. Nature Communications, 7, 12031.
Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington DC: Island Press.
Higashi, M., & Patten, B. C. (1989). Dominance of indirect causality in ecosystems. The American Naturalist, 133, 288–302.
Higashi, M., & Nakajima, H. (1995). Indirect effects in ecological interaction networks. I. The chain rule approach. Mathematical Biosciences, 130, 99–128.
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and the stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.
Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In W. C. Clark & R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, T. P., Baird, A. H., Bellwood, D. R., Card, M., Connolly, S. R., Folke, C., et al. (2003). Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science, 301, 929–934.
IPCC—Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (2007). Fourth Assessment Report. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 92-9169-122-4.
Jørgensen, S. E., Fath, B. D., Nielsen, S. N., Pulselli, F., Fiscus, D., Bastianoni, S. (2015). Flourishing within limits to growth: Following nature’s way. Earthscan Publisher. 220 p.
Kharrazi, A., Rovenskaya, E., Fath, B. D., Yarime, M., & Kraines, S. (2013). Quantifying the sustainability of economic resource networks: An ecological information-based approach. Ecological Economics, 90, 177–186.
Kharrazi, A., Fath, B. D., & Katzmair, H. (2016). Advancing empirical approaches to the concept of resilience: A critical examination of panarchy, ecological information, and statistical evidence. Sustainability, 8, 935.
Kharrazi, A., Rovenskaya, E., & Fath, B. D. (2017). Network structure impacts global commodity trade growth and resilience. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0171184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171184.
Kauppi, P. E., Mielikainen, K., & Kuusela, K. (1992). Biomass and carbon budget of European forest, 1971 to 1990. Science, 256, 70–74.
Libralato, S., Christensen, V., & Pauly, D. (2006). A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecol. Modell., 195, 153–171.
Loreau, M. (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Recent theoretical advances. Oikos, 91, 3–17.
MacArthur, R. H. (1955). Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology, 36, 533–536.
May, R. M. (1972). Will a large complex system be stable? Nature, 238, 413–414.
McCann, K. S. (2000). The diversity-stability debate. Nature, 405, 228–233.
McNaughton, S. J. (1977). Diversity and stability of ecological communities: A comment on the role of empiricism in ecology. The American Naturalist, 111(979), 515–525.
MEA. (2005). Millenium ecosystem assessment, 2005. http://www.millenniumassessment.org.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
Miao, L. J., Cui, L. F., Luan, Y. B., & He, B. (2011). Similarities and differences of Beijing and Shanghai’s land use changes induced by urbanization. Chinese Journal of Metal Science and Technology, 31(4), 398–404.
Moore, J. C., & de Ruiter, P. C. (2012). Energetic Food Webs. An analysis of real and model ecosystems: Oxford University Press.
Moore, J. C., de Ruiter, P. C., & Hunt, H. W. (1993). Influence of productivity on the stability of real and model ecosystems. Science, 261, 906–908.
Mori, A. S., Furukawa, T., & Sasaki, T. (2013). Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 88, 349–364.
Müller, F., Bergmann, M., Dannowski, R., Dippner, J. W., Gnauck, A., Haase, P., et al. (2016). Assessing resilience in long-term ecological data sets. Ecological indicators, 65, 10–43.
Mukherjee, J., Scharler, U. M., Fath, B. D., & Ray, S. (2015). Measuring sensitivity of robustness and network indices for an estuarine food web model under perturbations. Ecological Modelling, 306, 160–173.
Naeem, S., Chapin III, F. S., Costanza, R., Ehrlich, P. R., Golley, F. B., Hooper, D. U., Lawton, J. H., O’Neill, R. V., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., Symstad, A. J., & Tilman, D. (1999). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Maintaining natural life support processes. Issues in Ecology, 4, 1–11. Published by the Ecological Society of America.
Neutel, A.-M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., & De Ruiter, P. C. (2002). Stability in real food webs: Weak links in long loops. Science, 296, 1120–1123.
Pimm, S. L. (1982). Foodwebs. London: Chapman and Hall.
Power, M. E., Tilman, D., Estes, J. A., Menge, B. A., Bond, W. J., Mills, L. S., et al. (1996). Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience, 46, 609–620.
Rist, L., Felton, A., Nyström, M., Troell, M., Sponseller, R. A., Bengtsson, J., et al. (2014). Applying resilience thinking to production ecosystems. Ecosphere, 5, 1–11.
Rutledge, R. W., Basore, B. L., & Mulholland, R. J. (1976). Ecological stability: An information theory viewpoint. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 57, 355–371.
Salas, A. K., & Borrett, S. B. (2011). Evidence for dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks. Ecological Modelling, 222, 1192–1204.
Scharler, U. M. (2012). Ecosystem development during open and closed phases of temporarily open/closed estuaries on the subtropical east coast of South Africa. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Science, 108, 119–131.
Scharler, U. M., & Fath, B. D. (2009). Comparing network analysis methodologies for consumer—resource relations at species and ecosystems scales. Ecological Modelling, 220, 3210–3218.
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001). Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature, 413, 591–596.
Shevtsov, J., & Rael, R. (2015). Indirect energy flows in niche model food webs: Effects of size and connectance. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0137829.
Szyrmer, I., & Ulanowicz, R. E. (1987). Total flows in ecosystems. Ecological Modelling, 35, 123–136.
Tilman, D. (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: A search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455–1474.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (1986). Growth and development. New York: Springer.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2002). Information theory in ecology. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 25, 393–399.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2004). Quantitative methods for ecological network analysis. Computers and Chemistry, 28, 321–339.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009). The dual nature of ecosystem dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 220(16), 1886–1892.
Ulanowicz, R. E., & Puccia, C. J. (1990). Mixed trophic impacts in ecosystems. COENOSES, 5, 7–16.
Ulanowicz, R., Goerner, S., Lietaer, B., & Gomez, R. (2009). Quantifying sustainability: Resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory. Ecological Complexity, 6, 27–36.
Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., et al. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. PNAS, 99, 9266–9271.
Wagensberg, J., Garcia, A., & Sole, R. V. (1990). Connectivity and information transfer in flow networks: Two magic numbers in ecology? Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 52, 733–740.
Wootton, J. T. (1994). The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25(1), 443–466.
Xia, L., Fath, B. D., Scharler, U. M., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Science of the total environment spatial variation in the ecological relationships among the components of Beijing’s carbon metabolic system. Science of the Total Environment, 544, 103–113.
Zhang, Y., Xia, L. L., & Xiang, W. N. (2014). Analyzing spatial patterns of urban carbon metabolism: A case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 130, 184–200.
Zorach, A. C., Ulanowicz, R. E. (2003). Quantifying the complexity of flow networks: How many roles are there?. Complexity, 8(3), 68–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scharler, U.M. et al. (2018). Resilience Measures in Ecosystems and Socioeconomic Networks. In: Mensah, P., Katerere, D., Hachigonta, S., Roodt, A. (eds) Systems Analysis Approach for Complex Global Challenges. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71486-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71486-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71485-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71486-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)