Abstract
In this introductory chapter, we explore the debate surrounding intimate self-disclosures through social media. Discussions concerning sexting and sexting related incidents are associated with social media affordances. In particular, we investigate how digital media content’s persistence, visibility, spreadability and searchability are linked to challenges that individuals may face when sexting. Next, we examine how sexting behaviours can be understood through the lens of online disinhibition, as this may lower thresholds for intimate forms of communication. Finally, once a sexting message is sent, it involves individuals who share (or do not share) the same objectives and values concerning the intimate information they co-own. The Communication Privacy Management theory provides a framework to understand sexting as a shared responsibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Judgment and decision making in adolescence: Adolescent JDM. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00724.x.
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Bernstein, M. S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks, 21. ACM Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470658.
boyd, d. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge/Papacharissi, Z.
boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated. The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Burkett, M. (2015). Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sexuality & Culture, 19(4), 835–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9295-0.
Carmody, M. (2005). Ethical Erotics: Reconceptualizing anti-rape education. Sexualities, 8(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705056621.
Child, J. T., & Petronio, S. (2011). Unpacking the paradoxes of privacy in CMC relationships: The challenges of blogging and relational communication on the internet. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 21–40). New York: Peter Lang.
Choi, H., Van Ouytsel, J., & Temple, J. R. (2016). Association between sexting and sexual coercion among female adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 53, 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.10.005.
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2012). Hey mom, What’s on your Facebook? Comparing Facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611408619.
Dinakar, K., Jones, B., Havasi, C., Lieberman, H., & Picard, R. (2012). Common sense reasoning for detection, prevention, and mitigation of cyberbullying. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 2(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362394.2362400.
Döring, N. (2014). Consensual sexting among adolescents: Risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-1-9.
Drouin, M., Coupe, M., & Temple, J. R. (2017). Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends …. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018.
Evans, V. (2017). Emoji code. How smiley face, love hearts and thumbs up are changing the way we communicate. London: Michael O’Mara Books.
Gill, R. (2012). The sexualisation of culture?: Sexualisation of culture? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(7), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00433.x.
Griffin, E., Ledbetter, A., & Sparks, G. (2014). Communication privacy management theory. In A first look at communication theory (pp. 151–163). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hasinoff, A. A. (2014). Blaming sexualization for sexting. Girlhood Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2014.070108.
Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2008). Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), 1–12. https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4214/3256.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
Jackson, S., & Goossens, L. (2006). Handbook of adolescent development. New York: Psychology Press.
Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower. The culture and politics of cyberspace and the internet. London: Routledge.
Kosenko, K., Luurs, G., & Binder, A. R. (2017). Sexting and sexual behavior, 2011–2015: A critical review and meta-analysis of a growing literature: Sexting and sexual behavior. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(3), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12187.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22–S30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017.
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2012). Cyber bullying: Bullying in the digital age. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lim, S. S. (2013). On mobile communication and youth “deviance”: Beyond moral, media and mobile panics. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912459503.
Lippman, J. R., & Campbell, S. W. (2014). Damned if you do, damned if you don’t…If you’re a girl: Relational and normative contexts of adolescent sexting in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.923009.
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543995.
Microsoft. (2017). PhototDNA cloud service. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna
Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., Jones, L. M., & Wolak, J. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1730.
Peskin, M. F., Markham, C. M., Shegog, R., Temple, J. R., Baumler, E. R., Addy, R. C., et al. (2017). Prevalence and correlates of the perpetration of cyber dating abuse among early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0568-1.
Petronio, S. (1991). Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples. Communication Theory, 1(4), 311–335.
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. New York: State University of New York Press.
Petronio, S. (2004). Road to developing communication privacy management theory: Narrative in progress, please stand by. Journal of Family Communication, 4(3–4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2004.9670131.
Petronio, S. (2010). Communication privacy management theory: What do we know about family privacy regulation? Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(3), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00052.x.
Petronio, S. (2013). Brief status report on communication privacy management theory. Journal of Family Communication, 13(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.743426.
Petronio, S. (2016). Communication privacy management. In K. B. Jensen, E. W. Rothenbuhler, J. D. Pooley, & R. T. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 1–9). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect138.
Petronio, S., Jones, S., & Morr, M. C. (2003). Family privacy dilemmas: Managing communication boundaries within family groups. In L. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (pp. 23–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Piwek, L., & Joinson, A. (2016). “What do they snapchat about?” patterns of use in time-limited instant messaging service. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.026.
Resnick, N. (2016, July 28). 3 Growth hacks that catapulted a “Drunk-Dialing” app to sober success. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/279625
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and “sexting”: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853.
Schouten, A. P., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents’ online self-disclosure: Developing and testing an “internet-attribute-perception” model. Media Psychology, 10(2), 292–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260701375686.
Spooner, K., & Vaughn, M. (2016). Youth sexting: A legislative and constitutional analysis. Journal of School Violence, 15(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.974245.
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2(1), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1891/194589501787383444.
Steuber, K. R., & McLaren, R. M. (2015). Privacy recalibration in personal relationships: Rule usage before and after an incident of privacy turbulence. Communication Quarterly, 63(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1039717.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295.
Temple, J. R. (2015). A primer on teen sexting. JAACAP Connect, 2(4), 6–8.
Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Peeters, E. (2016). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. Journal of Youth Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865.
Van Royen, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., & Adam, P. (2017). “Thinking before posting?” Reducing cyber harassment on social networking sites through a reflective message. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.040.
Walrave, M., Vanwesenbeeck, I., & Heirman, W. (2012). Connecting and protecting? Comparing predictors of self-disclosure and privacy settings use between adolescents and adults. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2012-1-3.
Westin, A. (1970). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walrave, M., Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., Temple, J.R. (2018). Sharing and Caring? The Role of Social Media and Privacy in Sexting Behaviour. In: Walrave, M., Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., Temple, J. (eds) Sexting. Palgrave Studies in Cyberpsychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71882-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71882-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71881-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71882-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)