Abstract
What are the criteria to judge the democratic quality of the European Union? Is it possible to reconcile our democratic criteria with the intense, extensive complexity of a polity such as the European Union? In order to answer these questions appropriately, it is helpful to begin with the acknowledgement that we do not have an acceptable theory of democracy for anything more complex than nation states. That is why we must develop a political taxonomy that does not sacrifice the complexity of the European Union to the comfort of our well-established concepts. If we do not take into account the EU’s principal democratic innovations it is not possible to criticize its democratic weaknesses. As I will show, this lack of attention to the integration process is what makes certain attempts to exert national control over the democraticity of Communitarian decisions questionable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abromeit, Heidrun. 1998. Ein Vorschlag zur Demokratisierung des Europäischen Entscheidungssystems. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 39 (1): 80–90.
Beck, Gunnar. 2005. The Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: A Conflict Between Right and Right in Which There Is No Praetor. European Law Review 30 (1): 42–67.
Beck, Ulrich, and Edgar Grande. 2004. Das kosmopolitische Europa. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Benz, Arthur. 1998. Ansatzpunkte für ein europafähigen Demokratiekonzept. In Regieren in entgrentzten Räumen, ed. Beate Kohler-Koch, 345–367. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
———. 2003. Compounded Representation in EU-Multi Level Governance. In Linking EU and National Governance, ed. Beate Kohler-Koch, 81–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bohman, James. 2007. Democracy Across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bovens, Mark. 1998. The Quest of Responsability: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Robert. 2001. How Democratic Is the American Constitution? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert, and Edward Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Diez, Thomas. 1996. Postmoderne und europäische Integration. Die Dominanz des Staatsmodells, die Verantwortung degenüber dem Anderen und die Konstruktion eines alternativen Horizonts. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 3 (2): 255–281, 256.
Donahue, John D., and Mark A. Pollack. 2001. Centralization and Its Discontents: The Rythms of Federalism in the United States and the European Union. In The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governnce in the United States and the European Union, ed. Kalipso Nicolaïdis and Robert Howse, 73–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fabbrini, Sergio. 2007. Compound Democracies. Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fossum, John Erik, and Agustín José Menéndez. 2011. The Constitution’s Gift. A Constitutional Theory for a Democratic European Union. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
Franzius, Claudio, and Ulrich K. Jauss. 2012. Die Zukunft der Europäische Demokratie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. 2003. The Debate About Soveignty in the United States: A Historical and Comparative Perspective. In Sovereignty in Transition. Essays in European Law, ed. Neil Walker, 87–114. Oxford: Hart.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Die Postnationale Konstellation. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Halberstam, Daniel. 2012. Systems and Institutional Pluralism. In Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, ed. Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek, 85–125. Oxford: Hart.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. 1972 [1787]. Federalist Papers. Ed. Benjamin Fletcher Wright. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Höreth, Marcus. 1998. The Trilemma of Legitimacy—Multilevel Governance in the EU and the Problem of Democracy. ZEI Discussion Paper C11. http://www.zei.de/zei_deutsch/publikation/publ_zeic_dp.htm.
Hürrelmann, Achim. 2007. Multilevel Legitimacy: Conceptualizing Legitimacy. Relationships Between the EU and National Democracies. In Democratic Dilemmas of Multilevel Governance. Legitimacy, Representation and Accountability in the European Union, ed. Joan DeBardeleben and Achim Hurrelmann, 17–37. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Innerarity, Daniel. 2012. The Future and Its Enemies. In Defense of Political Hope. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Jachtenfuchs, Markus, and Beate Kohler-Koch. 1996. Regieren in dynamischen Mehebenensystem. In Europäische Integration, ed. Markus Jachtenfuchs and Beate Kohler-Koch, 15–45. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
Joerges, Christian. 1996. Taking the Law Seriously: On Political Science and the Role of Law in the Process of European Integration. European Law Journal, 105–115.
Jörke, Dirk. 2009. Die Dehnbarkeit der Demokratie im Spiegel der amerikanische Ritifizierungsdebatte. In Demokratie in der Weltgesellschaft, Soziale Welt. ed. Hauke Brunkhorst, Sonderband 18, 451–469.
Kumm, Mattias. 2002. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Review 65: 317–359.
———. 2005. The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Supremacy Before and After the Constitutional Treaty. European Law Journal 11 (3): 262–307.
———. 2011. How Does EU Law Fit into Public Law? In Political Theory of the European Union, ed. Jürgen Neyer and Antjie Wiener, 111–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leca, Jean. 2009. The Empire Strikes Back! An Uncanny View of the European Union: Part I—Do We Need a Theory of the European Union? Government and Opposition 44: 285–294.
Lenaerts, Koen. 1990. Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism. American Journal of Comparative Law 38: 205–263.
Lindseth, Peter L. 1999. Democratic Legitimacy and the Administrative Character of Supranationalism: The Example of the European Community. Columbia Law Review 99 (3): 628–738.
———. 2010. Power and Legitimacy. Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lord, Christopher, and Paul Magnette. 2004. E Pluribus Unum? Creative Disagreement About Legitimacy in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1): 183–202.
Lord, Christopher, and Johannes Pollak. 2010. The EU’s Many Representative Modes: Colluding? Cohering? Journal of European Public Policy 17 (1): 117–136.
Lübbe-Wolff, Gertrude. 2010. Europäisches und nationales Verfassungsrecht. Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 60: 246–289.
Ludlow, Peter. 2005. The Leadership in an Enlarged European Union: The European Council, the Presidency and the Commission. Brussels: EuroComment.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1994. Europa als Problem des Weltgesellschaft. Berliner Debate 2: 3–7.
———. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
MacCormick, Neil. 1995. The Maastricht Urteil: Sovereignty Now. European Law Journal 259–265.
———. 1997. Democracy, Subsidiarity, and Citizenship in the ‘European Commonwealth. Law and Philosophy 16 (4): 331–356.
Maduro, Miguel P. 1998. We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution. Oxford: Hart.
———. 2003. Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action. In Sovereignty in Transition: Essays in European Law, ed. Neil Walker, 3–32. Oxford: Hart.
———. 2012. Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism. In Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, ed. Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek, 67–84. Oxford: Hart.
Majone, Giandomenico. 2005. Dilemas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2009. Europe as the Would-Be World Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marks, Gary, and Liesbet Hooghe. 2004. Contrasting Visions of Multi-level Governance. In Multi-level Governance, ed. Ian Bache and Matthew Flinders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Middelaar, Luuk. 2012. Le passage à l’Europe. Histoire d’un commencement. Paris: Gallimard.
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1996. Compliance Theory: An Overview. In Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law, ed. J. Cameron, J. Werksman, and P. Roderick. London: Earthscan.
Neumann, Franz. 1980. Die Herrschaft des Gesetzes. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Neyer, Jürgen. 2003. Discourse and Order in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (4): 687–706.
Nicolaïdis, Kalypso. 2003. Our European Demoi-cracy: Is this Constitution a Third Way for Europe? In Whose Europe? National Models and the Constitution of the European Union, ed. K. Nicolaïdis and S. Weatherill, 137–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012. The Idea of European Demoicracy. In Philosophical Foundations of EU Law, ed. J. Dickson and P. Eleftheriadis, 247–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nicolaïdis, Kalipso, and Robert Howse, eds. 2001. The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2007. Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance. European Law Journal 13: 469–486.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1996. Exploring the Nature of the Beast: International Relations Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (1): 53–80.
Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2008. La Légitimité démocratique. Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité. Paris: Le Seuil.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1969. Considérations sur le Gouvernement de Pologne. OEuvres complètes III: 970–971.
Schilling, Theodor. 1996. The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order. Harvard International Law Journal 37 (2): 389–410.
Schmitter, Philippe. 2001. What Is There to Legitimise in the European Union. Jean Monnet Working Paper no 6/01, Symposium: Responses to the European Commission’s White Paper on Governance, Harvard.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.
Schütze, Robert. 2012. Federalism as Constitutional Pluralism: ‘Letter from America’. In Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, ed. Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek, 185–211. Oxford: Hart.
Schwengel, Hermann. 1999. Globalisierung mit europäischem Gesicht. Der Kampf um die politische Form der Zukunft. Berlin: Aufbau.
Sester, Peter. 2013. Status und Zukunft der Währungsunion. In Europa als Rechtsgemeinschaft – Währungsunion und Schuldenkrise, ed. Thomas Möllers and Franz-Christoph Zeitler, 175–200. Tübingen: Mohr.
Shaw, Jo, and Antje Wiener. 1998. The Paradox of the ‘European Polity’. In State of the European Union 5: Risks, Reforms, Resistance, and Revival, ed. M.G. Cowles and M. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tully, James. 2008. Public Philosophy in a New Key. Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, Helen. 1994. Theory and Practice in European Integration. In Economic and Political Integration in Europe: Internal Dynamics and Global Context, ed. S. Bulmer and A. Scott. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiler, Joseph H.H. 1995. Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision. European Law Journal 1 (3): 282–302.
———. 1999. The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weiler, Joseph H.H., and Ulrich R. Haltern. 1996. The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order—Through the Looking Glass. Harvard International Law Journal 37 (2): 411–448.
Wiener, Antje. 2008. The Invisible Constitution of Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wiesner, Claudia, Kari Palonen, and Tapani Turkka, eds. 2011. Parliament and Europe. Rethorical and Conceptual Studies on Their Contemporary Connections. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Young, Ernest. 2000. Constitutional Avoidance, Resistance Norms, and the Preservation of Judicial Review. Texas Law Review 78: 1549–1614.
Zetterquist, Ola. 2012. Out with the New, in with the Old—Neo-Roman Constitutional Thought and the Enigma of Constitutional Pluralism in the EU. In Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, ed. Matej Avbelj and Jan Komárek, 213–229. Oxford: Hart.
Zürn, Michael. 2005. Law and Compliance at Different Levels. In Law and Governance in Postnational Europe. Compliance Beyond the Nation-State, ed. M. Zürn and C. Joerges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Innerarity, D. (2018). What Should Be Democratized? The Peculiarity of Democracy in Europe. In: Democracy in Europe. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72197-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72197-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72196-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72197-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)