Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The New Interdisciplinary Frontiers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Heritage Management

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

This chapter deals with a specific case study: the Framework Plan for Historical Centre Recovery of Cagliari. The multidisciplinary approach is applied to valorize the contribution of the fields of major interest in support of the development of the urban planning discipline: environmental history, urban sociology, historical-morphological analysis based on the archeology of the preexistences and on historical topography. All these disciplines somehow imply a decoding of their epistemological codes and of their technical instrumentation which can serve as an equipment of the cultural device useful for the analysis to carry out in the field of the territorial and urban planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The dimensions of the landscape themselves anticipate the complexity of the landscape issue.

  2. 2.

    The situated goods are considered as goods in which the measure of their value would decrease if they were moved. It is J. Levy’s expression “Il ya du monde ici”.

  3. 3.

    According to Mumford the medieval archetype of the city is that one of Ambrogio Lorenzetti’s.

  4. 4.

    Cfr. Directive 2001/42/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programs on the environment.

  5. 5.

    Some important considerations can be found in the Carte per il Patrimonio: International Charter for the Conservation and the Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter) Venice 1964. La Carta UNESCO: Recommendation for the Protection of Movable Cultural Property, General Conference—20th Session, Paris 1978.

  6. 6.

    In general cfr. the C.A.R.T. project for the Emilia-Romagna.

  7. 7.

    For the United Kingdom, the fundamental documents are: The Ancient Monument and Archaeological Areas Act of 1979, overcome by the Planning Police Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning (PPG16, 1990). The main legislation is the National Heritage Act 1984, Local Government Act 1985, Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. The Practices can be distinguished as follows: Planning Police Guidance 16: Archaeology and Planning (PPG16) 1990, Planning Police Guidance 15: Planning and Historic Environment (PPG15) 1994. Also, English Heritage Urban Archaeological databases programs and York City Council 1992, in: www.york.gov.uk/leisure/local_history_and_heritage/archaeology/surveys/arch_summ/. For France see B. Boissavit Camus, “Les services territoriaux, une alternative pou l’archéologie urbaine”, in: Nouvelles de l’archéologie 71, 1988, pp. 52–53; AA.VV., Conserver ou détruire les vestiges archéologiques; la carte archéologique; l’archéologie dans l’aménagement du territoire, Actes des quatrième et cinquième rencontres nazionales de l’archéologie (Montpellier avril 1992 et Marseille octobre 1993), Atelier du patrimoine de la ville de Marsille, De Boccard-Diffusion, Document d’archéologie, d’histoire et d’architecture, 3; Documents d’evaluation du patrimoine archéologique urbain, Centre National d’Archeologie urbaine, DEPAU, Tours; H. Galinié, “La gestion des Archives du sol en ville”, in Jornadas Internacionales de Arqueologia de Intervencion (Donostia 1991), Bilbao 1992, pp. 137–164; pp. 23–36. For Greece cfr. AA.VV., The city beneath the city. Antiquities from the Metropolitan Raiway Excavation, Athens, Kapon Ed. 2000.

  8. 8.

    A consistent disciplinary support in the debate on the requalification of the historical urban heritage takes place in parallel, leading to advanced reflections, from the historicism to Giovannoni.

  9. 9.

    See the world of perception in K. Lynch.

  10. 10.

    The methods of the Forma Italiae, Ancient City in Italy, Forma Maris Antiqui, Tabula Imperii Romani. Codified methods guaranteeing the comparison and juxtaposition of the data that today represent the best in innovation for what concerns the field of the archeological science in relation to the urban and territorial analysis for the periods of the antiquity and Middle Ages.

  11. 11.

    The note is by Antonio Cederna.

  12. 12.

    The reasons which led to the decision of drafting, less than 4 years from the adoption of the Consolidating Statute, a “new” code for the cultural heritage, are formally expressed by art. 10 of the Law 137 of 2002, synthesizable as follows: to adapt the regulation on the cultural and environmental heritage to articles 117 and 118 of the Constitution, modified with the reform of its Title V, to the communitarian regulation and to the international agreements; to improve the effectiveness of the actions concerning goods and cultural activities; to simplify and abbreviate the procedures; to update the tools of individuation, conservation and protection of the cultural goods.

  13. 13.

    Cfr. Legislative Decree 22 January 2004, n. 42, Part I. General Dispositions art. 3. It has been widely noticed that it is unclear where the protection entrusted to the state ends and where the enhancement, competence of the regions, begins, and how this fact generates conflicts and problems.

  14. 14.

    Cfr. “Rapporto sistematico annuale 2005 sulle attività culturali delle Amministrazioni pubbliche” published as supplement to the Giornale dell’Arte, anno XXIII, n.243, maggio 2005, Torino Umberto Allemandi & C.

References

  • AA.VV. (1984) Archéologie et aménagement. Rapport du Colloque de Florence, 10/22-25, Patrimoine architectural. Rapports et études 5, Conseil de l’Europe, Strasburg, passim

    Google Scholar 

  • AA.VV. (2003) Il mondo e i luoghi. Geografie dell’identità e del cambiamento. In: De Matteis G, Ferlaino F (eds) IRES Istituto di Ricerche economico-sociali del Piemonte, Torino, Grafica ESSE, pp 59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorosino S (2004) comment on article 145 of the Code of the cultural and landscape heritage. In: AA.VV. Il Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio (by Cammelli M), Bologna, Il Mulino, p 569

    Google Scholar 

  • Argan GC, Fagiolo M (1972) Premessa all’arte italiana IV. I problemi della città. La struttura organica. In: AA.VV. Storia d’Italia I. I caratteri originali, Torino, Einaudi, pp 772–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth G, Howard P (1999) European Heritage: Planning and Management. Intellected Books, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrero Rodriguez C (1990) La ordenación juridica del Patrimonio Histórico, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermejo Latre JL (2002) La pianificazione del paesaggio. I piani paesistici e la nuova tutela delle risorse naturali, Maggioli, Milano, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighi O, Biscaglia AM (2001) Urbanistica e archeologia. In: AA.VV., Dalla Carta del rischio archeologico di Cesena alla tutela preventiva urbana in Europa, (by Gelichi S), Comune di Cesena. Assessorato all’Urbanistica. Settore Programmazione urbanistica, Firenze, All’Insegna del Giglio, pp 93–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Carta M (1999) L’armatura culturale del territorio. Il patrimonio culturale come matrice di identità e strumento di sviluppo. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Clementi A (2005) Vent’anni dopo Memorabilia. In: Territorio 32, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Conforto ML (2002), Roma, la città del futuro nella lezione della storia: modelli tipologici e strategie di intervento. In: AA.VV., Archeologia urbana e progetto di architettura, Gangemi, Roma, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Deplano G (1999) Piano per il Recupero del Centro Storico di Cagliari (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deplano G (2009) Cagliari: dalla città murata alla città dei piani. In: Piroddi E, Cappuccitti A (eds) il Nuovo Manuale di Urbanistica, Gruppo Mancosu Editore srl., Roma, pp B542–B563

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockès P (1969) Lo spazio nel pensiero economico dal XVI al XVIII secolo. Mondadori, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre L (1953) Studi su riforma e Rinascimento, in particular, La terra e l’evoluzione umana, Torino, Einaudi 1966, p 594. Braudel F, Civiltà e imperi del Mediterraneo nell’età di Filippo II, Torino, Einaudi, p 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro E (1999) Città in trasformazione. Le logiche di sviluppo della metropoli contemporanea. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 138–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambi L (1972) I valori storici dei quadri ambientali. In: AA.VV. Storia d’Italia I. I caratteri originali, Torino, Einaudi, pp 5–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambino R (2002) Maniere di intendere il paesaggio. In: AA.VV. Interpretazioni di paesaggio (by Clementi A), Roma, Meltemi, pp 54–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzillo E (2002) Il restauro. L’insoddisfazione del nuovo. In: Mattei E (ed) Equilibri. Rivista per lo sviluppo sostenibile 1/2002. La città storica del futuro, Bologna, Il Mulino Fondazione, pp 15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JD (2002) An environmental history of the world. humankind’s changing role in the community of life. Routledge, London-New-York

    Google Scholar 

  • Indovina F (1999) La città prossima futura: un nuovo protagonismo istituzionale. In: AA.VV. I futuri della città: Mutamenti, nuovi oggetti e progetti, Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozato Giotard JP (1999) Geografia del turismo. Dallo spazio visitato allo spazio consumato, Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnier A, Russo P (2002) Sociologia dei sistemi urbani, Milano, Il Mulino, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas Guindal La Farga A (1993) Visión de la ciudad histórica. In: Urbanismo y Conservación de Ciudades Patrimonio de la Humanidad, Mérida, pp 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamon FP, Hatton A (2000) Cultural resource management in contemporary society: perspectives on managing and presenting the past, Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Meogrossi P (1999) Strategie per il parco archeologico di Roma. Dal centro storico all’Appia antica. In: AA.VV., Recuperar la memoria urbana. L’arqueologia en la rehabilitaciò de les ciutats històriques, Tarragona 27 i 28 de febrer de 1997 (by Mar R, Ruiz de Arbulo J, Subias E), 2 Documents d’Arqueologia Clàssica Tarragona 1999, pp 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri Sernieri S (2005) Incorporare la natura. Storie ambientali del Novecento, Carocci, Roma, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigro GL (1999) Piani regolatori generali di ultima generazione. Argomenti di riflessione e letture di piani locali, Gangemi, Roma, p 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Park R, Burgess W, McKenzie RD (1999) La città, Torino. Edizioni di comunità (trans: Rauty R)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piroddi E (1999) Le forme del piano urbanistico, Franco Angeli, Milano, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman A (2000) Qualities of historic towns to be preserved—according to the charter and besides it. In: AA.VV., Algreen Ussing G, Bek L, Bo Frandsen S, Hansen JS (eds) Urban space and urban conservation as an aesthetic problem. Lectures presented at the international conference in Rome, October 23rd–26th, 1997, Roma, L’Erma di Bretschneider, pp 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvemini B (1997) Luoghi di antico regime. La costruzione dello spazio nella storiografia francese. Storica 9:7–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi B (2000) Prima lezione di urbanistica. Laterza p, Bari, p 141

    Google Scholar 

  • Terán F (1982) Planeamiento urbano en la España contemporánea (1900–1980), Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres M (2000) Luoghi magnetici. spazi pubblici nella città moderna e contemporanea, Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle G (1992) Archeologia e pianificazione. Il PGR come strumento di tutela e valorizzazione del patrimonio archeologico: l’esempio di Pavia. In: AA.VV., Nuove ricerche archeologiche in provincia di Pavia, Acts by Pearce M, II convegno di Casteggio—14 ottobre 1990, Casteggio, pp 89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittorini MA (1999) Luogo, segni e memorie nella costruzione del piano urbanistico. In: AA.VV., Piani regolatori generali di ultima generazione. Argomenti di riflessione e letture di piani locali (by Nigro GL), Roma, Gangemi, pp 29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Voghera A (2005) Politiche di tutela e innovazione dei paesaggi in Europa. In: Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, n 83

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Anna Maria Colavitti

Authors
  1. Anna Maria Colavitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Maria Colavitti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Colavitti, A.M. (2018). The New Interdisciplinary Frontiers. In: Urban Heritage Management. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72338-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation