Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the Interplay of Social and Market Logics in Hybrid Business Models: A Case Study of Australian B Corps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Business Models

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Traditional approaches to sustainability , such as philanthropy, corporate social responsibility, and product innovation are insufficient to radically transform business and society toward genuine, substantive sustainable development. New hybrid business models are emerging that employ market tactics to address sustainable development issues. B Corps are a hybrid organization exemplar, blending traditionally for-profit practices with traditionally non-profit practices to address social and/or environmental issues. This chapter provides insights into how B Corps integrate for-profit (market logic) and for-purpose (social logic) considerations into their business models, drawing on interviews with 15 Australian B Corps. The research study found that social and market logics are strongly integrated in some areas (e.g., mission, recruitment and marketing) but trying to balance these two logics has created tensions and conflict in other areas (e.g., ownership structure, performance measurement, sales and distribution, product design and development). The findings emphasize the importance of creating a common organizational identity that strikes a balance between the logics to moderate conflict and one logic dominating over another. The B Corps are attempting to do this by instantiating the market and social logics in their missions, recruitment and socialization practices (remuneration, communication and training practices).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberti, F., & Varon Garrido, M. (2017). Can profit and sustainability goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B Lab. (2014). B Corporation. Accessed from http://www.bcorporation.net/

  • Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiliana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belz, F., & Binder, J. (in press). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besharov, M., & Smith, W. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkin, F., Polesie, T., & Lewis, L. (2009). A new business model for sustainable development: An exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(5), 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B., Henning, N., Reyna, E., Wang, D., & Welch, M. (2009). Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chad, P. (2013). Implementing market orientation in charities. Marketing Theory, 13(3), 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., & Kelly, T. (2015). B-Corps – A growing form of social enterprise tracing their progress and assessing their performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittman, D. (2016). B-Corporations: Profits and social responsibility? Accessed from https://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2016/08/26/b-corporations-profits-social-responsibility/

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase profits. The New York Times Magazine, 33, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, L., Byrd, J., & Hickman, K. (2014). Explaining the location of mission-driven businesses: An examination of B-Corps. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2014(55), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, J. (2013). The Benefit Corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A., Badiane, K., & Haigh, N. (2012). Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit and non-profit divide. In K. Golden-Briddle & J. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations (pp. 131–153). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., & Littlewood, D. (2015). Identifying, mapping, and monitoring the impact of hybrid firms. California Management Review, 57(3), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (2016). Why the new Benefit Corporations may not prove to be truly socially beneficial. Business and Professional Ethics Journal. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201672641.

  • Lee, M. S., & Battilana, J. (2013, July). How the zebra got its stripes: Imprinting of individuals and hybrid social ventures. Boston: Harvard Business School (Working Paper, No. 14-005). http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11508213

  • Mars, M. M., & Lounsbury, M. (2009). Raging against or with the private marketplace? Logic hybridity and ecoentrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(1), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1995). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. South Melbourne: Longman Cheshire (first published 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., Klaber, A., & Thomason, B. (2011). B Lab: Building a new sector of the economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J., & Warnick, B. (2016). Should we require every new venture to be a hybrid organization? Exploring the limits of a world of blended value. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 630–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013a). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B (pp. 3–35). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013b). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, B. D. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. (2017). Going one’s own way: Drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48(4), 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roome, N., & Louche, C. (2016). Journeying toward business models for sustainability: A conceptual model found inside the black box of organisational transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 11–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F., Pache, A.-C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work: Aligning business models and organizational design for social enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargsian, Z. (2012). The good guy of corporations: B Corporations and the efficiencies of an environmentally and socially conscious entity. Accessed from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2025232

  • Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016a). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2016b). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W. (2017a). Characterising B Corps as a sustainable business model: An exploratory study of B Corps in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144, 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W. (2017b). Sustainable entrepreneurship and B Corps. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a ‘sustainability business model’. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2010). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

    Wendy Stubbs

Authors
  1. Wendy Stubbs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Stubbs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Antwerp Management School, Antwerp, Belgium

    Lars Moratis

  2. NHTV Breda University of Applied Science, Breda, The Netherlands

    Frans Melissen

  3. Guildhall Faculty of Business and Law, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom

    Samuel O. Idowu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stubbs, W. (2018). Examining the Interplay of Social and Market Logics in Hybrid Business Models: A Case Study of Australian B Corps. In: Moratis, L., Melissen, F., Idowu, S. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation