Skip to main content

Psychology and Dichotomic Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radical Behaviorism and Cultural Analysis
  • 769 Accesses

Abstract

Although psychology necessarily addresses various conceptual and philosophical dichotomies, for most of them, consensual theoretical solutions have not yet been established. Innatist or environmentalist, monist or dualist, and determinist or indeterminist arguments are examples that permeate the different theoretical mediations or approaches. In short, the presuppositions admitted by each one of the philosophies of science that have been adopted, Radical Behaviorism among them, constitute the thread of continuity of the main epistemological reflections to be found in the context of psychology. In that scenario this essay seeks to underscore the role of relations and especially functional relations in enabling the understanding of human behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In philosophy, for example, it is common to come across dyads like rationalism-irrationalism, materialism-idealism, and theory-praxis and, colloquially in shared areas, physical-psychic, soul-body, interior-exterior, and public-private.

  2. 2.

    Note that here “cultural-behavioral” does not indicate the dual nature of the social phenomenon—social and cultural at the same time—but, just the reverse, it merely indicates the behavioral constitution of the cultural practices.

  3. 3.

    For an analysis of the sense in which the term “Radical” is appropriated in the context of Skinnerian Behaviorism, see Carrara and Strapasson (2014).

References

  • Carrara, K., & Strapasson, B. A. (2014). Em que sentido(s) é radical o behaviorismo radical? Acta Comportamentalia, 22(1), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara, K., & Zilio, D. (2013). O comportamento diante do paradigma behaviorista radical. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 9(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953) Science and Human Behavior. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carrara, K. (2018). Psychology and Dichotomic Thinking. In: Radical Behaviorism and Cultural Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74301-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics