Abstract
Bearing in mind what has already been argued in favor of Behavior Analysis’s viable contributions to a society constructed on the maxim of social justice, this chapter sets out to evaluate the current state of its scientific development, the ethical-ideological difficulties that are specifically those of cultural planning, and the technological obstacles that empirical research and theoretical formulations have already identified. Essentially this brief review of the potentialities of the selection by consequences model is not primarily about the interactions of organisms with their environment in their intimate and particular relations, but instead it is about those relations of individuals with their environment that are mediated by other individuals. We dedicate our attention to this last configuration of contingencies, which Skinner called social behavior, pointing to the existence of technology and conceptual material of importance for the consolidation of Behavior Analysis as a concrete strategy for fostering social well-being. Among other cultural planning possibilities, we analyze that of installing altruistic behavior patterns designed to ensure the unfolding of social and environmental sustainability actions to preserve and conserve decent survival conditions for future generations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Glenn presented the concept “metacontingency” for the first time at a conference given during the 1985 edition of the annual reunion of the Association of Behavior Analysis in Columbia, Ohio.
- 2.
The use of inverted commas here is because Skinner defined “social” behavior by describing the existence of mediation between the behavior of one organism and that of others. In doing so, however, he did not assume the existence of any quality inherent or intrinsic to the nature of living organisms (especially humans) as if they bore within them some kind of “sociability” that was natural to the species.
References
Carrara, K. (2005). Behaviorismo radical: Crítica e metacrítica (p. 439). São Paulo: Ed. Unesp. (First edition: Marília: Unesp Marília Publicações; Fapesp, 1998).
Carrara, K., Souza, V. B., Oliveira, D. R., Orti, N. P., Lourencetti, L. A., & Lopes, F. R. (2013). Desenvolvimento de guia e fluxograma como suporte para delineamentos culturais. Acta Comportamentalia, 21(1), 99–119.
Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden two. Behavioral Analysis and Social Action, 5(1-2), 2–8.
Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., et al. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27.
HARRIS , M. (1989 Our Kind: Who We Are, Where We Came From, Where We Are Going. New York: Harper/Collins.
Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57(4), 193–216.
Skinner, B. F. (2014a). Science and human behavior. Cambridge, MA: The B. F. Skinner Foundation. (Original de 1953).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carrara, K. (2018). Sustainability and Conditional Altruism. In: Radical Behaviorism and Cultural Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74301-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74301-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74300-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74301-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)