Skip to main content

STEM Women Faculty Struggling for Recognition and Advancement in a “Men’s Club” Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring the Toxicity of Lateral Violence and Microaggressions

Abstract

Despite having made a number of positive steps to advance diversity and provide support for women scientist in the past ten years, STEM research institutions continue to be an environment where women faculty face a kind of “patriarchal DNA” that treats women scientists as subordinate to men. An environment continues to exist where women faculty often feel unwelcome, and unsatisfied with the rate of their accomplishments. At the time of promotion and tenure women can feel a sense of betrayal as their work is evaluated as being “less than” the work of men. To be successful in a derisive environment, many STEM women faculty report that they have developed coping strategies to adapt to a culture that often excludes them from occupying senior leadership roles, diminishes their accomplishments, and makes them feel remorseful for trying to find a work–life balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguirre, A., Jr. (2000). Women and minority faculty in the academic workplace: Recruitment, retention, and academic culture. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(6). Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series: ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The language of “race” and prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1983). Academic Workplace: New Demands, Heightened Tensions. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report (Vol. 10). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, A. S. (2000). Everyday Racism: A Book for All Americans. Chicago, IL: Sourcebooks, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society, 24(5), 616–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 20–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2002). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantine, M. G., Smith, L., Redington, R. M., & Owens, D. (2008). Racial microaggressions against Black counseling and counseling psychology faculty: A central challenge in the multicultural counseling movement. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(3), 348–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy, A. J., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecklund, E., & Lincoln, A. E. (2016). Failing Families, Failing Science: Work-Family Conflict in Academic Science. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essed, P. (1991). Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory (Vol. 2). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge‚ New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleras, A. (2016). Theorizing Micro-aggressions as Racism 3.0: Shifting the discourse. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 48(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, science, and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15(5), 654–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F., & Colatrella, C. (2006). Participation, performance, and advancement of women in academic science and engineering: What is at issue and why. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, K. N. (2011). Academic bullying: A barrier to tenure and promotion for African-American faculty. Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy, 5(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2012). “I couldn’t wait to leave the toxic environment”: A mixed methods study of women faculty satisfaction and departure from one research institution. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 5(1), 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L., Kennelly, I., & Ward, K. B. (2000). Revisiting the gender, marriage, and parenthood puzzle in scientific careers. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28(1/2), 62–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. (2017). Faculty service loads and gender: Are women taking care of the academic family? Research in Higher Education, 58(6), 672–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(105), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. H. (2009). The Everyday Language of White Racism. Oxford, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayakumar, U. M., Howard, T. C., Allen, W. R., & Han, J. C. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(5), 538–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., & Heck, R. H. (1994). A university’s faculty: Identifying who will leave and who will stay. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(1), 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsrud, L. K., & Wunsch, M. (1991). Junior and senior faculty women: Commonalities and differences in perceptions of academic life. Psychological Reports, 69(3), 879–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornberg, J. C. (2008). Jumping on the mommy track: A tax for working mothers. UCLA Women’s LJ, 17, 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, R. (2015). Race and language learning in multicultural Canada: Towards critical antiracism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1998). Images of Organization (The Executive Edition). California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. and Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2006). ADVANCE: Increasing the Participation and Advancement of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Careers. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5383.

  • Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M., & Westby, C. (1992). Ethnography and research: A qualitative review. Topics in Language Disorders, 12(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Huber, L., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Visualizing everyday racism: Critical race theory, visual microaggressions, and the historical image of Mexican banditry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, C. T. (2010). Race and gender oppression in the classroom: The experiences of women faculty of color with white male students. Teaching Sociology, 38(3), 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J. (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothblum, E. D. (1988). Leaving the ivory tower: Factors contributing to women’s voluntary resignation from academia. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. (2015). Everyday racism in Canadian schools: Ideologies of language and culture among Korean transnational students in Toronto. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(1), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoshana, A. (2016). The language of everyday racism and microaggression in the workplace: Palestinian professionals in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(6), 1052–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. (1990). A causal model of faculty turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 31(5), 405–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. P., & Freyd, J. J. (2014). Institutional betrayal. American Psychologist, 69(6), 575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. S. V., & González, J. C. (2011). Faculty women of color: The critical nexus of race and gender. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, P. D. (2006). The contribution of faculty of color to undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 317–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Wendel, L., & Ward, K. (2013). Work and family integration for faculty: Recommendations for chairs. Department Chair, 23, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. J. (2008). Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 607–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 139–176.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support provided by the National Science Foundation through grant HRD 1409171. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruder, B., Plaza, D., Warner, R., Bothwell, M. (2018). STEM Women Faculty Struggling for Recognition and Advancement in a “Men’s Club” Culture. In: Cho, C., Corkett, J., Steele, A. (eds) Exploring the Toxicity of Lateral Violence and Microaggressions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74760-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74760-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74759-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74760-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics