Skip to main content

Analysing the Relationships Between Digital Literacy and Self-Regulated Learning of Undergraduates—A Preliminary Investigation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Systems Development

Abstract

Advances in technology access allow undergraduates to personalize their learning to their individual interests via the creation and use of informal personal learning environments (PLEs). A comprehensive understanding of how every day digital technologies are adapted and used to create such PLEs and their impact on acquisition and development of students’ digital literacy (DL) and self-regulated learning (SRL) skills, is still lacking. This paper presents the initial exploratory quantitative phase, of a longitudinal mixed methods study planned to identify and describe the relationship between DL and SRL skills of students, when using PLEs. Structural equation modelling was used to analyze data collected from 202 participants in online surveys. The results confirm that DL components effect some SRL sub-processes and some evidence was obtained for reciprocal relationships. Implications for Information Systems theory and practice are discussed together with future research opportunities.

A prior version of this paper has been published in the ISD2017 Proceedings (http://aisel.aisnet.org/isd2017/proceedings2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vivian, R., Barnes, A.: Social networking: from living technology to learning technology? Curric. Technol. Transform. Unkn. Future Proc. Ascilite Syd. 1007–1019 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fruhmann, K., Nussbaumer, A., Albert, D.: A psycho-pedagogical framework for self-regulated learning in a responsive open learning environment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference eLearning Baltics Science (eLBa Science 2010), pp. 1–2. Fraunhofer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tausend, J.: How students use technology outside of the classroom, EdTech Magazine. http://www.edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2013/08/how-students-use-technology-outside-classroom. Accessed 04 Aug 2015 (2013)

  4. Fiedler, S.H.D., Väljataga, T.: Personal learning environments: concept or technology? Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ. 2(4), 1–11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tess, P.A.: The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—a literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(5), A60–A68 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pettenati, M.C.: Roadmap to PLE—a research route to empower the use of personal learning environments (PLEs). Interact. Des. Archit. 2010(9–10), 11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keppell, M.J.: Personalised learning strategies for higher education. In: The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces. International Perspectives on Higher Education Research, pp. 3–21. JAI Press, Bingley, WA. United Kingdom (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eichhorn, B.R.: Common Method Variance Techniques. Clevel. State Univ. Dep. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. Clevel. OH SAS Inst. Inc. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly, T.: Chapter 02. Introducing Personal Learning Environments to Informal Learners: Lessons Learned from the OpenLearn Case Study|Open Educational Resources, Open Educational Resources and Social Networks. http://oer.kmi.open.ac.uk/?page_id=1254#.VYzLgfmqpBc. Accessed 26 June 2015 (2012)

  10. Laakkonen, I., Taalas, P.: Towards new cultures of learning: personal learning environments as a developmental perspective for improving higher education language courses. Lang. Learn. High. Educ. 5(1) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., Vojt, G.: Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Comput. Educ. 56(2), 429–440 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmerman, B.J.: Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract. 41(2), 64 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, M., Kim, J.: Correlation between digital literacy and self-regulated learning skills of learners in university e-learning environment. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 71 (Education 2014), 80–83 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greene, J.A., Moos, D.C., Azevedo, R.: Self-regulation of learning with computer-based learning environments. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2011(126), 107–115 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchem, I.: Editorial for the Special Issue on Personal Learning Environments. Spec. Ed. Pers. Learn. Environ. Curr. Res. Emerg. Pract. 15(2) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bembenutty, H.: New directions for self-regulation of learning in postsecondary education. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2011(126), 117–124 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Valtonen, T., Hacklin, S., Dillon, P., Vesisenaho, M., Kukkonen, J., Hietanen, A.: Perspectives on personal learning environments held by vocational students. Comput. Educ. 58(2), 732–739 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallego, M.J., Gamiz, V.M.: Personal Learning Environments (PLE) in the academic achievement of university students. Aust. Educ. Comput. 29(2) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kravcik, M., Klamma, R.: Supporting self-regulation by personal learning environments. In: Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on, pp. 710–711. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dabbagh, N., Kitsantas, A.: Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High. Educ. 15(1), 3–8 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eshet, Y.: Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. J. Educ. Multimed. Hypermedia. 13(1), 93–106 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bawden, D.: Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In: Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. Peter Lang, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eshet, Y.: Thinking in the digital era: a revised model for digital literacy. Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 9(2), 267–276 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ng, W.: Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Comput. Educ. 59(3), 1065–1078 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimmerman, B.J.: Chapter 2—attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In: Zeidner, M.B.R.P. (ed.) Handbook of Self-Regulation, pp. 13–39. Academic Press, San Diego (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Santoso, H.B., Lawanto, O., Becker, K., Fang, N., Reeve, E.M.: High and low computer self-efficacy groups and their learning behavior from self- regulated learning perspective while engaged in interactive learning modules. J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res. J-PEER. 4(2) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Butler, D.L., Cartier, S.C.: Multiple complementary methods for understanding self-regulated learning as situated in context. In: Meetings of the American Educational Research Association (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Magno, C.: Assessing academic self-regulated learning among Filipino college students: the factor structure and item fit. Int. J. Educ. Psychol. Assess. 5 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zimmerman, B.J., Martinez-Pons, M.: Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 80(3), 284–290 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Paris, S.G., Byrnes, J.P.: The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H. (eds.) Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement, pp. 169–200. Springer, New York (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Azevedo, R.: Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: an introduction. Metacognition Learn 2(2–3), 57–65 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perera Muthupoltotage, U., Gardner, L., Peiris, A.: Investigating the interrelationship between undergraduates’ digital literacy and self-regulated learning skills. In: ICIS 2016 Proceedings. Dublin, Ireland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Crano, W.D., Brewer, M.B., Lac, A.: Principles and Methods of Social Research. Routledge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., Mckeachie, W.J.: Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ. Psychol. Meas. 53(3), 801–813 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roth, A., Ogrin, S., Schmitz, B.: Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: a systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educ. Assess. Eval. Account. 1–26 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fan, W., Yan, Z.: Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(2), 132–139 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Handwerk, P.G., Carson, C., Blackwell, K.M.: On-line versus paper-and-pencil surveying of students: a case study. In: 40th Annual Meeting of the Association of Institutional Research (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Krosnick, J.A., Presser, S.: Question and questionnaire design. Handb. Surv. Res. 2, 263–314 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gefen, D., Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C.: Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4(1), 7 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.R.: A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(2), 189–217 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chin, W.W.: How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (eds.) Handbook of Partial Least Squares, pp. 655–690. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Kock, N.: Using warpPLS in e-collaboration studies: an overview of five main analysis steps. Int. J. E-Collab. IJeC. 6(4), 1–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hair, J.F.J.H., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications, Inc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E.: Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W.: Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J. Manag. 12(4), 531–544 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kock, N., Lynn, G.: Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13(7) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kock, N.: Using warpPLS in e-collaboration studies: descriptive statistics, settings, and key analysis results. Int. J. E-Collab. IJeC. 7(2), 1–18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sawilowsky, S.: New effect size rules of thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods. 8(2) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zaidieh, A.J.Y.: The use of social networking in education: challenges and opportunities. World Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. J. WCSIT. 2(1), 18–21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Greene, J.A., Yu, S.B., Copeland, D.Z.: Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Comput. Educ. 76, 55–69 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shopova, T.: Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the university. J. Effic. Responsib. Educ. Sci. 7(2), 26–32 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zumbrunn, S., Tadlock, J., Roberts, E.D.: Encouraging self-regulated learning in the classroom: a review of the literature. Metrop. Educ. Res. Consort. MERC. 1–28 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Perera Muthupoltotage, U., Gardner, L.: Undergraduates Perception of Informal Personal Learning Environments: Affordances for Self-regulated Learning. Presented at the 28th Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Hobart, Tasmania (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Udayangi Perera Muthupoltotage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perera Muthupoltotage, U., Gardner, L. (2018). Analysing the Relationships Between Digital Literacy and Self-Regulated Learning of Undergraduates—A Preliminary Investigation. In: Paspallis, N., Raspopoulos, M., Barry, C., Lang, M., Linger, H., Schneider, C. (eds) Advances in Information Systems Development. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74817-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics