Skip to main content

Spinning the Web: The Contradictions of Researching and Regulating Digital Work and Labour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies of Labour and the Politics of Contradiction

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

This chapter tackles a number of debates surrounding the topic of virtual work, shedding light on the diverse discourses by focusing on three contradictory relationships characterizing virtual work: the compression of time and place vs. the global reach of virtual spaces; autonomy vs. control; and collaboration vs. competition. Developments in these three contradictory relationships are examined through two topics that represent traditional areas of analysis for the sociology of work: institutional embeddedness and labor markets and the question of how the complex division of labor and value capture in work in digital environments can be conceptually understood is addressed. The analysis shows how dis-embedded institutions and amorphous labor markets challenge the formulation of policy and regulation in light of the unbounded, poorly defined, and obfuscated character of virtual work.

Virtual work is very diverse and has many forms. This chapter leaves the exact designation of what virtual work is relatively open with one exception: forms of virtual labor exchange that are carried out locally such as for transport, accommodation, services, and so on, are excluded. All other forms, both paid and unpaid, are included, although the emphasis is largely on work on digital platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balkin, J. (2012, July 10). Mediating the social contradiction of the digital age. Crooked Timber. http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/30/mediating-the-socialcontradiction-of-the-digital-age/

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blohm, I., Bretschneider, U., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2010). Does collaboration among participants lead to better ideas in IT-based idea competitions? An empirical investigation. In R. H. Sprague (Ed.), Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2010, Kauai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of time. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degryse, C. (2016). Digitalisation of the economy and its impact on labour markets (ETUI working paper). Brussels: ETUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). Introduction. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahokoupil, J., & Fabo, B. (2016). The platform economy and the disruption of the employment relationship. ETUI policy brief, European economic, employment and social policy, no. 5/2016. Brussels: ETUI aisbl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1992). Management challenges of the 21st century. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, W., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2010). Community engineering for innovations: The ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&D Management, 39(4, 2009), 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, G. M., & Bardhi, F. (2015, January 28). The sharing economy isn’t about sharing at all. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2015/01/the-sharingeconomy-isnt-about-sharing-at-all

  • Edwards, R. (1979). Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., & Wajcman, J. (2005). The politics of working life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Anderson, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecker, J., & Meil, P. (2010). Organisational restructuring and emerging service value chains—Implications for work and employment. Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), 680–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker, S. (2010). A very complicated version of freedom: Conditions and experiences of creative labour in three cultural industries. Poetics, 38(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtgrewe, U., Kerst, C., & Shire, K. (Eds.). (2002). Re-organising service work in Europe: Call centres in Germany and Britain. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U. (2006). The restructuring of global value chains and the creation of a cybertariat. In C. May (Ed.), Global corporate power: (Re)integrating companies into the international political economy (pp. 65–82). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the global digital economy: The cybertariat comes of age. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U. (2017). Where did online platforms come from? The virtualization of work organization and the new policy challenges it raises. In P. Meil & V. Kirov (Eds.), The policy implications of virtual work (pp. 29–48). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huws, U., Spencer, N. H., & Joyce, S. (2016). Crowd work in Europe: Preliminary results from a survey in the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria and the Netherlands. Brussels: European Foundation for Progressive Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • IG Metall. (2016). Frankfurt paper on platform-based work—Proposals for platform operators, clients, policy makers, workers, and worker organizations. Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens, U., Malsch, T., & Dohse, K. (1993). Breaking from Taylorism: Changing forms of work in the automobile industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaganer, E., Carmel, E., Hirscheim, R., & Olsen, T. (2013). Managing the human cloud. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D., Finn, M., & Turner, F. (2011). The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the network society. New Media & Society, 13(2), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPlante, R., & Silberman, M. S. (2016). Building trust in crowd worker forums: Worker ownership, governance, and work outcomes, weaving relations of trust in crowd work: Transparency and reputation across platforms. Proceedings of WebSci16. Workshop co-located with WebSci’16, May 22–25, Hannover. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehdonvirta, V., & Mezier, P. (2013). Identity and self-organization in unstructured work (Working paper, series 1, COST Action IS 1202). Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehdonvirta, V., Barnard, H., & Graham, M. (2014). Online labor markets, presented at IPP2014, Crowdsourcing for politics and policy, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister, J. M., Zogaj, S., & Durward, D. (2015). New forms of employment and IT—Crowdsourcing. In 4th Conference for the Regulating for Decent Work Network, Genf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meil, P. (2012). Consent and content: Effects of value chain restructuring on work and conflict among highly skilled workforces. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 6(2), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meil, P., Tengblad, P., & Doherty, P. (2009). Value chain restructuring and industrial relations: The role of workplace representation in changing conditions of employment and work. Leuven: HIVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (2014). Agile: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milland, K. (2016). Crowd work: Shame, secrets and an imminent threat to employment. Global Labour Column 238(June). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (1994). Searching for a new institutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and the global-local disorder. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prassl, J., & Risak, M. (2017). The legal protection of crowdworkers: Four avenues for workers rights in the virtual realm. In P. Meil & V. Kirov (Eds.), The policy implications of virtual work (pp. 273–296). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2014). The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, D., Deiss, M., Döhl, V., Bieber, D., & Altmann, N. (2017 second edition, first published in 1992). Systemic rationalisation and inter-company divisions of labor. In N. Altmann, C. Koehler, and P. Meil (Eds.), Technology and work in German industry (pp. 46–62). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schörpf, P., Flecker, J., & Schönauer, A. (2017). On call for one’s online reputation—Control and time in creative crowdwork. In K. Briken, S. Chillas, M. Krzywdzinski, & A. Marks (Eds.), The new digital workplace. How new technologies revolutionise work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulten, T., Eldring, L., & Naumann, R. (2015). The role of extension for the strength and stability of collective bargaining in Europe. In G. Van Gyes & T. Schulten (Eds.), Wage bargaining under the new European economic governance: Alternative strategies for inclusive growth (pp. 361–400). Brussels: ETUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. P., & Bogdanowicz, M. (2012). The digital shift in the media and content industries: Policy brief. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2010). Go with the flow: Labour power mobility and labour process theory. In P. Thompson & C. Smith (Eds.), Working life—Renewing labour process analysis (pp. 269–296). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., & Briken, K. (2016). Actually existing capitalism: Some digital delusions. In K. Briken, S. Chillas, M. Krzywdzinski, & A. Marks (Eds.), The new digital workplace: How new technologies revolutionise work (pp. 241–263). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., Jones, M., & Warhurst, C. (2007). From conception to consumption: Creativity and the missing managerial link. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C., & Tilly, C. (1998). Work under capitalism. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenduc, G., & Vendramin, P. (2016). Work in the digital economy: Sorting the old from the new (ETUI working paper 2016.03). Brussels: ETUI aisbl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirsig, K., & Compton, J. (2017). Workers, contradictions and digital commodity chains: Organizing with content creators in Canada. In P. Meil & V. Kirov (Eds.), The policy implications of virtual work. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meil, P. (2018). Spinning the Web: The Contradictions of Researching and Regulating Digital Work and Labour. In: Bilić , P., Primorac, J., Valtýsson, B. (eds) Technologies of Labour and the Politics of Contradiction. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76279-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76279-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76278-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76279-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics