Skip to main content

Reproducing a Neural Question Answering Architecture Applied to the SQuAD Benchmark Dataset: Challenges and Lessons Learned

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10772))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Reproducibility is one of the pillars of scientific research. This study attempts to reproduce the Gated Self-Matching Network, which is the basis of one of the best performing models on the SQuAD dataset. We reimplement the neural network model and highlight ambiguities in the original architectural description. We show that due to uncertainty about only two components of the neural network model and no precise description of the training process, it is not possible to reproduce the experimental results obtained by the original implementation. Finally we summarize what we learned from this reproduction process about writing precise neural network architecture descriptions, providing our implementation as a basis for future exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Code available at https://github.com/alexduer/squad-gated-rep.

References

  1. Chen, D., Bolton, J., Manning, C.D.: A thorough examination of the CNN/daily mail reading comprehension task. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2358–2367 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., Bengio, Y.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1724–1734 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 249–256 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hermann, K.M., Kocisky, T., Grefenstette, E., Espeholt, L., Kay, W., Suleyman, M., Blunsom, P.: Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1693–1701 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, M., Peng, Y., Qiu, X.: Mnemonic reader for machine comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02798 (2017)

  7. Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  8. Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J.R., Bethard, S., McClosky, D.: The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: ACL (System Demonstrations), pp. 55–60 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), vol. 14, pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., Liang, P.: Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson, M., Burges, C.J., Renshaw, E.: Mctest: a challenge dataset for the open-domain machine comprehension of text. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), vol. 3, p. 4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rojas, R.: Neural Networks: A Systematic Introduction. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61068-4

  13. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G.E., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Vinyals, O., Fortunato, M., Jaitly, N.: Pointer networks. In: Cortes, C., Lawrence, N.D., Lee, D.D., Sugiyama, M., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, pp. 2692–2700. Curran Associates, Inc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, S., Jiang, J.: Learning natural language inference with LSTM. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, W., Yang, N., Wei, F., Chang, B., Zhou, M.: Gated self-matching networks for reading comprehension and question answering. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xiong, C., Zhong, V., Socher, R.: Dynamic coattention networks for question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01604 (2016)

  18. Zeiler, M.D.: Adadelta: an adaptive learning rate method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.5701 (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Dür .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dür, A., Rauber, A., Filzmoser, P. (2018). Reproducing a Neural Question Answering Architecture Applied to the SQuAD Benchmark Dataset: Challenges and Lessons Learned. In: Pasi, G., Piwowarski, B., Azzopardi, L., Hanbury, A. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10772. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76941-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics