Skip to main content

Some Solutions to the Now What Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moral Error Theory
  • 365 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter commences part II of this book, which is about what error theorists should do with normative ethics. This chapter introduces the now what question : error theory, and now what should we do with our moral discourse that we use to talk about ethics? It lists the assessment criteria for every prescriptive metaethical theory that aims to answer this question and proceeds to argue that every prescriptive metaethical theory currently discussed in the literature is implausible. These theories are: revolutionary fictionalism , revolutionary expressivism , conservationism , and abolitionism . A new theory that I find plausible will be discussed in the next chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayer, A.J. 1936. Language, Truth and Logic. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. 2011. Expressivism and Moral Dilemmas. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14: 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. 1984. Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Ruling Passions. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J.A. 1998. Error Theories and Values. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 534–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R. 2006. Reasons and the Good. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cuneo, T., and S. Christy. 2011. The Myth of Moral Fictionalism. In New Waves in Metaethics, ed. M. Brady, 85–102. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eklund, M. 2011. Fictionalism. In The Stanford Enclyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1984. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. 2010. Abolishing Morality. In A World Without Values, ed. R. Joyce and S. Kirchin, 217–234. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.T. 1965. Assertion. Philosophical Review 74: 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. 1990. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. 2013. Moral Tribes. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. 1952. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Point and Method. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. 1642[1983]. De Cive, ed. H. Warrender. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1651. Leviathan, ed. R. Tuck, 1991. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1739/40. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, 1978. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1751. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. P.H. Nidditch, 1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, S. 2015. After Moral Error Theory, After Moral Realism. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 53: 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. 2001. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Moral Fictionalism. In Fictionalism in Metaphysics, ed. M.E. Kalderon, 287–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Morality, Schmorality. In Morality and Self-Interest, ed. P. Bloomfield, 51–75. Oxford: OUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kalderon, M.E. 2005. Moral Fictionalism. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalf, W.F. 2017. Against Hybrid Expressivist-Error Theory. Journal of Value Inquiry 51: 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, S., and M. Ridge. 2013. Revolutionary Expressivism. Ratio 26: 428–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, M. 2014. The ‘Now What’ Problem for Error Theory. Philosophical Studies 171: 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. 2011. Judgement and Justification. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J.L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. Hume’s Moral Theory. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, D., G. Restall, and C. West. 2005. Moral Fictionalism Versus the Rest. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83: 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oddie, G., and D. Demetriou. 2010. The Fictionalist’s Attitude Problem. In A World Without Values, ed. R. Joyce and S. Kirchin, 199–216. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. 2014. Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. 2012. Cognitivism About Imperatives. Analysis 72: 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Command and Consequence. Philosophical Studies 164: 61–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, M. 2008. Expression for Expressivists. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76: 86–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. 1981. The Expanding Circle. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. 1991. Realism. In A Companion to Ethics, ed. P. Singer, 399–410. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, N. 2010. Contractualism and the Foundations of Morality. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, C.L. 1937. The Emotive Meaning of Ethical Terms. Mind 46: 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, S. 2006. A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value. Philosophical Studies 127: 109–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suikkanen, J. 2013. Moral Error Theory and the Belief Problem. In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, ed. R. Shafer-Landau, vol. 8, 168–194. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda, T. 2011. Hybridizing Moral Expressivism and Moral Error Theory. Journal of Value Inquiry 45: 37–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Why Moral Error Theorists Should Become Revisionary Moral Expressivists. Journal of Moral Philosophy 14: 48–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, M. 1999. Morality Without Foundations. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresan, J. 2010. Question Authority: In Defense of Moral Naturalism Without Clout. Philosophical Studies 150: 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vranas, P. 2010. In Defense of Imperative Inference. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39: 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kalf, W.F. (2018). Some Solutions to the Now What Problem. In: Moral Error Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77288-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics