Abstract
This chapter begins with the link between innovation and corporate social responsibility. In addition to the sustainability of products and services, innovation management should also consider the factors of climate change, energy consumption, environmental protection, resource scarcity or demographic change. These factors can be taken into account within the framework of a CSR concept. A CSR concept consists of four different levels: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic responsibility. These responsibilities build on each other.
After the development of a CSR concept, it is important to consider the control of the innovation process in order, among other things, to use the existing resources of the company profitably and purposefully, or to ensure the flow of information between the parties involved in the innovation process or project. The control of innovation activities can be supported by innovation control. In this innovation control, the success measurement of the innovation management takes place according to predefined metrics or performance measurement systems. The development of innovation control should be based on the company’s innovation strategy. The tasks of the innovation control include, among other things, the provision of information and data for innovation management, the planning and control of innovation projects and the consulting of innovation management for the control of the innovation process. In addition, innovation control supports the selection and evaluation of ideas.
The innovation control can consist of stand-alone metrics representing the company’s business in a compressed form, or performance measurement systems that combines several metrics and thus increases the meaningfulness of the overview.
The Balanced Innovation Card is presented as an example of such a performance measurement system. This is a model for the planning and control of innovation projects. The Balanced Innovation Card is viewed as an extension of the Balanced Scorecard and takes account of the entire innovation management. The aim of the Balanced Innovation Card is to provide information on how to improve efficiency in innovation management. The following four perspectives are considered: innovation culture, innovation resources, innovation process and innovation output.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Books
Altenburger, R. (2013). Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung als Innovationsquelle. In R. Altenburger (Ed.), CSR und Innovationsmanagement – Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung als Innovationstreiber und Wettbewerbsvorteil. Berlin: Springer.
Beeck, C. (2010). Balanced innovation card: Instrument des strategischen Innovationsmanagements für mittelständische Automobilzulieferer. In A. von Ahsen (Ed.), Bewertung von Innovationen im Mittelstand. Berlin: Springer.
Bickel, I. M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility – Einflussfaktoren, Erfolgswirkungen und Einbezug in produktpolitische Entscheidungen. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.
Clampitt, H. G., & Jones, E. (2007). The RFID certification textbook (3rd ed.). Arlington Heights: American RFID Solutions.
Dausend, J. (2008). Unternehmenskultur und corporate responsibility. Hamburg: Igel.
Plessis, D., Jacques, J., Hargovan, A., Bagaric, M., & Harris, J. (2015). Principles of contemporary corporate governance (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eberhardt, I. (2006). F&E-Controlling in hochtechnologieorientierten, mittelständischen Unternehmen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Technologiefrühaufklärung. In V. Lingnau (Ed.), Controllinginstrumente im Mittelstand, Konferenz Mittelstandscontrolling, TU Kaiserslautern. Josef Eul: Lohmar.
Goldschmidt, N., & Homann, K. (2011). Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung der Unternehmen – Theoretische Grundlagen für eine praxistaugliche Konzeption. München: Roman Herzog Institut.
Hauff, M., Isenmann, R., & Müller-Christ, G. (2012). Industrial ecology management. Berlin: Springer.
Heinrich, P. (2015). Instrumente der CSR-Kommunikation – Unternehmerische Verantwortung überzeugend vermitteln. In A. Schneider & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility – Verantwortungsvolle Unternehmensführung in Theorie und Praxis (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Janssen, S. (2011). Innovationssteuerung mit Kennzahlen – Erfolgswirkungen und Determinanten einer konzeptionellen Kennzahlennutzung. Göttingen: Cuvillier.
Kamps, T. (2003). Systematic chasing for economic success – an innovation management approach for German SME’s in drive technology business. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.
Kraus, H. (1993). Betriebswirtschaftliche Kennzahlen als Steuerungsinstrumente des Controllings. In K. Liessmann (Ed.), Controlling-Konzepte für den Mittelstand. Existenzsicherung durch Innovation und Flexibilität. Freiburg im Breisgau: Haufe.
Krause, H. U., & Arora, D. (2010). Controlling-Kennzahlen – Key performance indicators. München: Oldenbourg.
Littkemann, J. (2005). Innovationscontrolling. München: Vahlen.
Littkemann, J., & Derfuß, K. (2011). Innovationscontrolling. In S. Albers & O. Gassmann (Eds.), Handbuch technologie und innovationsmanagement. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Loew, T., & Braun, S. (2009). CSR-Handlungsfelder – Die Vielfalt verstehen – Ein Vergleich aus der Perspektive von Unternehmen, Politik, GRI, ISO 26000. Berlin: Akzente.
Malla, P. B. (2010). Corporate governance: concept, evolution and India story. New York: Routledge.
Marchetti, M. A. (2007). Sarbanes-Oxley ongoing compliance guide: Key processes and summary checklist. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mayerhofer, W., Grusch, L., & Mertzbach, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility – Einfluss auf die Einstellung zu Unternehmen und Marken. Wien: Facultas.
Möller, K., Menninger, J., & Robers, D. (2011). Innovationscontrolling – Erfolgreiche Steuerung und Bewertung von Innovationen. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
Parmenter, D. (2007). Key performance indicators: Developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Posluschny, P. (2010). Basiswissen Mittelstandscontrolling. München: Oldenbourg.
Preissler, P. (2008). Betriebswirtschaftliche Kennzahlen: Formeln, Aussagekraft, Sollwerte, Ermittlungsintervalle. München: Oldenbourg.
Rautenstrauch, T. (2006). Balanced Scorecard in mittelständischen Unternehmen – Empirische Ergebnisse und Implikationen. In V. Lingnau (Ed.), Einsatz von Controllinginstrumenten im Mittelstand. Konferenz Mittelstandscontrolling, TU Kaiserslautern. Lohmar: Josef Eul.
Reichmann, T. (2011). Controlling mit Kennzahlen. Die systemgestützte Controlling- Konzeption mit Analyse- und Reportinginstrumenten. München: Vahlen.
Sarkar, S. (2007). Innovation, market archetypes and outcome: An integrated framework. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Skalak, S. C. (2002). Implementing concurrent engineering in small companies. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Stausberg, M. (2009). Kennzahlen im Innovationsmanagement – Entwicklungsrisiken systematisch minimieren. Kissing: Weka Media.
Vahs, D., & Burmester, R. (2005). Innovationsmanagement: Von der Produktidee zur erfolgreichen Vermarktung. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
Vetter, E. (2015). Corporate Governance und Mittelstand. In Fahrenschon, G., Kirchhoff, A. G., und Simmert, D. B. (Eds.) Mittelstand – Motor und Zukunft der deutschen Wirtschaft (S. 127–143). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Wagenhofer, A. (2009). Controlling und corporate governance-anforderungen. Berlin: Erich- Schmidt.
Weber, J., & Schäffer, U. (2011). Einführung in das Controlling. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschl.
Magazines/Journals
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility – Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
European Commission. (2010). Risk management in the procurement of innovation concepts and empirical evidence in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443–459.
Internet Sources
Daum, J. H. (2016). Innovation management and the role of controlling. Accessed October 07, 2016, from http://www.iioe.eu/fileadmin/files/publications/e_Controlling_Innovation_J_Daum_e.pdf
European Commission. (2001). Grünbuch – Europäische Rahmenbedingungen für die soziale Verantwortung von Unternehmen, KOM(2001) 366 endgültig, Brüssel. Accessed May 02, 2017, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/committees/deve/20020122/com(2001)366_de.pdf
ISO – International Organization for Standardization. ISO 2600 – Social responsibility. Accessed October 07, 2016, from http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso26000.htm
Spielkamp, A., & Rammer, C. (2006). Balanceakt Innovationen – Erfolgsfaktoren im Innovationsmanagement kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen. Accessed February 18, 2014, from ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/docus/dokumentation0604.pdf ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/
TCI Transformation Consulting International. (2016). The transformation experts. Accessed August 01, 2017, from https://www.tci-partners.com/de/dokumente/tci-corporate-14
Unesco: Concept of Governance. Accessed October 07, 2016, from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/quality-framework/technical-notes/concept-of-governance/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaschny, M., Nolden, M. (2018). Corporate Governance and Control of Innovation Process. In: Innovation and Transformation . Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78524-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78524-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78523-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78524-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)