Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship: Think, Create and Act

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fostering Innovative Cultures in Sport

Abstract

This chapter introduces entrepreneurship as a driver of innovation, social change, and economic development. It argues that entrepreneurship is critical for sustaining economic prosperity through job creation as it improves the competitiveness of an economy and creates new wealth. However, it is equally important to maintain the entrepreneurial spirit even inside established organisations in order to produce a high level of entrepreneurial development and a climate of innovation. The chapter further notes that entrepreneurship should be seen as a core element of sports. Sport enterprises embarking on an entrepreneurial journey for the first time are faced with the need to quickly adapt to situations. Many sport enterprises lack an awareness of the ripple effects that policies, norms, markets and numerous other factors can have on their intended actions. Learning how to ‘play the game’ means learning how to effectively react and even stimulate the ripples in order to not only survive, but thrive in creating new opportunities. The chapter leads to the question of whether sport enterprises can learn how to be entrepreneurial so as to achieve their ambitions. It concludes that entrepreneurship can be seen as a management process wherein entrepreneurial behaviour is crucial to the long-term vitality of sport enterprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 76ers No. 46 On Entrepreneur’s Top Company Culture List. (2017). CBS. http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2017/02/22/76ers-no-46-on-entrepreneurs-top-company-culture-list/. Accessed [online] 24 Dec 2017.

  • Autioa, E., Kenney, M., Mustard, P., Siegele, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43, 1097–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. (2002). The free-market innovation machine: Analyzing the growth miracle of capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. (1983). A model of the intersection of strategic behaviour, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Journal of Management Review, 8, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, M., & Mazzalovo, G. (2004). Pro logo: Brands as a factor of progress. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ciletti, D. (2011). Sports entrepreneurship: A theoretical approach. In D. Ciletti & S. Chadwick (Eds.), Sports entrepreneurship: Theory and practice (pp. 1–14). Morgantown: West Virginia University: Fitness Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2006). Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2, 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbordes, M. (2001). Innovation management in the sports industry: Lessons from the Salomon case. European Sport Management Quarterly, 1(2), 124–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G., & Lumpkin, G. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransman, M., & Bogdanowicz, M. (2014). Models of innovation in Global ICT firms: The emerging global innovation ecosystems. Seville. https://doi.org/10.2791/10679.

  • Gerke, A. (2016). Towards a network model of innovation in sport: The case of product innovation in nautical sport clusters. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 18(3), 270–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. (1986). Entrepreneurs, organizations, and the sport marketplace: Subjects in search of historians. Journal of Sport History, 13, 14–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidemann, A., Gersten, F., & Ove Riis, J. (2006). The nexus of corporate entrepreneurship and radical innovation. Corporate and Innovation Management, 15(4), 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M., Ireland, R., Camp, S., & Sexton, L. (2001). Guest editors introduction to the special issue on strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeber, L., & Hoeber, O. (2012). Determinants of an innovation process: A case study of technological innovation in a community sport organization. Journal of Sport Management, 26(3), 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship and strategic management action to create firm wealth. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1964). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: A.M.Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konczal, J. (2013). The most entrepreneurial metropolitan area? Kansas City: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Hodgetts, R. M. (1998). Entrepreneurship. New York: Thompson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. (1998). Entrepreneurship: An international perspective. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, S. (2008). Goals of sports clubs. European Journal for Sport and Society, 5(2), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, R., & Sorensen, J. (2010). Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Science, 56(7), 1116–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., & Swan, J. (1995). The diffusion of innovations in sport organizations: An evaluative framework. Journal of Sport Management, 9, 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philadelphia 76ers. http://www.espn.com/nba/team/roster/_/name/phi/philadelphia-76ers. Accessed [online] 23 Dec 2017.

  • Philadelphia 76ers History. http://www.nba.com/sixers/history/index_new.html. Accessed [online] 28 Feb 2018.

  • Philadelphia 76ers Innovation Lab. http://sixersinnovationlab.com/. Accessed [online] 28 Feb 2018.

  • Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, D. (2010). Entrepreneurship. In S. W. Pope & J. Nauright (Eds.), Routledge companion to sports history (pp. 197–215). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratten, V. (2010). The future of sport management: A social responsibility, philanthropy and entrepreneurship perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(4), 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratten, V. (2011). Sport-based entrepreneurship: Towards a new theory of entrepreneurship and sport management. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratten, V. (2016). Sport innovation management: Towards a research agenda. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 18(3), 238–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratten, V. (2018). Sports innovation management (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratten, V., & Ferreira, J. J. (Eds.). (2017). Sport entrepreneurship and innovation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. (1980). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: Agents for change in American government. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, C. B., & Romanelli, E. (2001). Emergent themes and the next wave of entrepreneurship research. In C. Schoonhoven & E. Romanelli (Eds.), The entrepreneurship dynamic: Origins of entrepreneurship and the evolution of industries (pp. 383–408). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1983). American institutions and economic progress. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2, 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Towards reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, J., & Spinelli, S. (2007). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century (8th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjønndal, A. (2016). Sport, innovation and strategic management: A systematic literature review. Brazilian Business Review, 13, 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, K. (2013). Beyond industrial policy: Emerging issues and new trends (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 2). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4869clw0xp-en

  • Wemmer, F., & Koenigstorfer, J. (2016). Open innovation in non-profit sports clubs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations, 27(4), 1923–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9571-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahara, S., & Hayton, J. (2001). Fostering entrepreneurship during international expansion: Managing key challenges. European Management Journal, 19, 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Case Study: Entrepreneurship—Philadelphia 76ers

Case Study: Entrepreneurship—Philadelphia 76ers

The Philadelphia 76ers are an American Professional Basketball team that play in the National Basketball Association (NBA) league , competing in the Eastern Conference Atlantic Division. The team are based in the Philadelphia Metropolitan area, are the 25th most valuable NBA team and play at the Wells Fargo Centre. The team was founded in 1946 originally playing as the Syracuse Nationals.

Despite periods of low attendance, criticism from general managers in the league , disappointed fans booing the losses and low morale among players there have been progressive leaps forward off the court for the Sixers. The franchise made innovative strides with digital acquisitions, the launch of their very own Innovation Lab and a strategy to foster and grow innovative start-ups with a new focus on eSports to leverage the brand, and enter new markets.

The Sixers have become renowned for having one of the best organisational cultures in the US. In times when the world is going digital and communications and social engagement is more digital than ever the Sixers have found room in their strategy to work on the ‘human touch’. They have the biggest sales team in the league and focus on making a personal connection with consumers. If a fan turns up to a game they want that individual to feel comfortable and be greeted like they are at home. This feeling of comfort is what draws the fans to the game and a strategy used to ensure sustainable ticket sales.

The Sixers were also identified by Entrepreneur, as one of the best places to work in Philadelphia. An employee survey assessed the Sixers based on 10 core qualities ; collaboration, innovation, agility, communication, support, wellness, mission and value alignment, work environment, responsibility and performance. The current political climate offers the Sixers the opportunity to create unity by bringing people together and driving change. With the team now beginning to see the fruits of their labour on the court they can offer more focus on their back-office business activities. This entrepreneurial activity can be leveraged by the brand to enter new markets and tap into more consumer interests. As the marketing machine of the Philadelphia 76ers begins to roll the franchise is building its new digital markets to become part of an innovative ecosystem that offers a seamless marketing link for the franchise to deliver content, products, services and merchandise tailored to the consumer needs of its fans.

The digital ecosystem that is being built around the eSport space is an innovative approach from the Sixers. Investing in start-ups coming through their own Innovation Lab and facilitating the growth of eSport Entrepreneurs on site allows the Sixers to integrate these sectors throughout their marketing strategies . The success of the NBA 2K league (PlayStation Game) and the Sixers’ entrepreneurial activities have enabled the franchise to keep ahead of the game in terms of strategic innovation . The Sixers now sell ads in the virtual e-Sports universe by offering sponsorship in the virtual arena, as well as on-court logos and as a patch on their virtual jerseys. These innovations are creating new revenue streams for the franchise.

The challenge that many franchises of this magnitude have with developing their innovative ecosystems around eSports is the lack of business behind them to sell it. The current gap in innovative activities is often sporadic in sports enterprises yet the Sixers have found a way to overcome these innovation gaps by creating their own talent incubators to feed the needs of their consumers. By creating a space for entrepreneurs to flourish, developing new algorithms and analytics to assist gamers to improve, the opportunity for the Sixers to connect with a wider fan base by integrating their entrepreneurial activities in emerging markets has materialised.

The franchise is a forward-thinking seeking to offer the best personal consumer experience possible. The executives behind the franchise have been failed entrepreneurs themselves and understand the needs and pitfalls of the entrepreneurial experience. They have enabled a new generation of millennial entrepreneurs to have the support needed to scale their businesses which in turn offer support to the Sixers’ wider marketing strategy. This unique ecosystem they have created fosters an innovative environment and that has enabled the Sixers the opportunity to grow their business both on and off the court.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skinner, J., Smith, A.C.T., Swanson, S. (2018). Entrepreneurship: Think, Create and Act. In: Fostering Innovative Cultures in Sport. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78622-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics