Abstract
This chapter examines how gendered and classed positions are co-constructed and accessed through participation in whole class discussions in the primary mathematics classroom. Using Holland and Bourdieu, we highlight how forms of participation mark out gendered and classed positions in education and how this is mediated through the exchange of capital which takes place locally in whole class discussions. We present evidence regarding the experiences of two girls, Sian and Erica, who appear to take up/enact the contrasting positions of ‘domestique’ and ‘in need of help’, which we argue, are mediated by their perceived ability and gender. Our aim is to highlight the concept of ‘position’ as a means to understand how local participation (classroom level) is structurally mediated by the educational field – thus giving more or less access to the symbolic capital that success in mathematics affords.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archer, L., & Francis, B. (2005). ‘They never go off the rails like other ethnic groups’: Teachers’ constructions of British Chinese pupils’ gender identities and approaches to learning. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 165–182.
Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. London: Penguin.
Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory talk for learning. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 1–15). London: Sage.
Bauersfeld, H. (1980). Hidden dimensions in the socalled reality of a mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(1), 23–41.
Beaman, R., Wheldall, K., & Kemp, C. (2006). Differential teacher attention to boys and girls in the classroom. Educational Review, 58(3), 339–366.
Biggs, A., & Edwards, V. (1994). ‘I treat them all the same’: Teacher-pupil talk in multi-ethnic classrooms. In D. Graddol, J. Maybin, & B. Steirer (Eds.), Researching language and literacy in social context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Bishop, J. P. (2012). She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74.
Black, L. (2004a). Teacher-pupil talk in whole class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347–360.
Black, L. (2004b). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.
Black, L. (2007). Analysing cultural models in socio-cultural discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1), 20–30.
Black, L. (2011). ‘She’s not in my head or in my body’: Developing identities of exclusion and inclusion in whole-class discussions. In C. Wyatt-Smith, J. Elkins, & S. Gunn (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on difficulties in learning literacy and numeracy (pp. 331–348). Dordrecht: Springer.
Black, L., Mendick, H., & Solomon, Y. (Eds.). (2008). Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler & J. Greeno (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 170–200). Westport: Ablex.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Johnson, R. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, culture and society. London: Sage.
Buschor, C. B., Berweger, S., Frei, A. K., & Kappler, C. (2014). Majoring in STEM: What accounts for women’s career decision making? A mixed methods study. Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 167–176.
Choudry, S., Williams, J., & Black, L. (2017). Peer relations and access to capital in the mathematics classroom: A Bourdieusian social network analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(7), 1037–1053.
DfE (2015). GCSE and equivalent attainment by pupil characteristics, 2013–2014 (revised). Statistical First Release (SFR06/2015). Accessed 10 Oct 2016 www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-gcses-key-stage-4.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
Eisenhart, M., & Allen, C. D. (2016). Hollowed out: Meaning and authoring of high school math and science identities in the context of neoliberal reform. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 188–198.
Empson, S. B. (2003). Low-performing students and teaching fractions for understanding: An interactional analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 305–343.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics – A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497–514.
Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2013). The co-construction of learning difficulties in mathematics-teacher-student interactions and their role in the development of a disabled mathematical identity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 341–368.
Holland, D., & Skinner, D. (1987). Prestige and intimacy: The cultural models behind Americans' talk about gender types. In D. Quinn (Ed.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 78–111). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Howe, C. (1997). Gender and classroom interaction. Edinburgh: SCRE.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599–600.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139–155.
Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analytic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 443–471.
Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport: Ablex.
Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mendick, H. (2005a). Only connect: Troubling oppositions in gender and mathematics. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9(2), 161–180.
Mendick, H. (2005b). Mathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 235–251.
Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 430–445.
Mroz, M., Smith, F., & Hardman, F. (2000). The discourse of the literacy hour. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(3), 379–390.
Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self- concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 323–345.
Norman, K. (1992). Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Noyes, A. (2009). Exploring social patterns of participation in university-entrance level mathematics in England. Research in Mathematics Education, 11(2), 167–183.
Radovic, D., Black, L., Salas, C., & Williams, J. (2017). Being a girl mathematician: Analysis of the diversity of positive mathematical identities in a secondary classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 434–464.
Renold, E., & Allan, A. (2006). Bright and beautiful: High achieving girls, ambivalent femininities, and the feminization of success in the primary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27(4), 457–473.
Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2012). The gender confidence gap in fractions knowledge: Gender differences in student belief – Achievement relationships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(5), 278–288.
Scott, P. (2008). Talking a way to understanding in science classrooms. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in schools. London: Sage.
Sinclair, J. M. H., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Solomon, Y. (2008). Mathematical literacy: Developing identities of inclusion. London: Routledge.
Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 171–183.
Stanworth, M. (1983). Gender and schooling: A study of sexual divisions in the classroom. London: Hutchinson.
Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS videotape classroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Stipek, D. J., & Gralinski, J. H. (1991). Gender differences in children’s achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 361–371.
Swinson, J., & Harrop, A. (2009). Teacher talk directed to boys and girls and its relationship to their behaviour. Educational Studies, 35(5), 515–524.
Turner, E., Dominguez, H., Maldonado, L., & Empson, S. (2013). English learners’ participation in mathematical discussion: Shifting positionings and dynamic identities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 199–234.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Rieber, R. W. (1988). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of general psychology (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Rieber, R. W. (1997). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: The history of the development of higher mental functions (Vol. 4). Dordrecht: Springer.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Willingham, W., & Cole, N. (1997). Research on gender differences. In W. W. Willingham & N. Cole (Eds.), Gender and fair assessment. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
WISE (2015). Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: The talent pipeline from classroom to boardroom. Accessed 15 Nov 2016 https://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/resources/2015/07/wise-statistics-2014.
Younger, M., Warrington, M., & Williams, J. (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality or rhetoric? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 325–341.
Zevenbergen, R. (2000). Mathematics, social class and linguistic capital: An analysis of mathematics classroom interactions. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Black, L., Radovic, D. (2018). Gendered Positions and Participation in Whole Class Discussions in the Mathematics Classroom. In: Gellert, U., Knipping, C., Straehler-Pohl, H. (eds) Inside the Mathematics Class. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79045-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79044-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79045-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)