Skip to main content

Kidney and Adrenal Gland Cytology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Non-Gynecologic Cytology

Part of the book series: Atlas of Anatomic Pathology ((AAP))

  • 1304 Accesses

Abstract

The critical role of fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the workup of the kidney and adrenal gland lesions continues to evolve and is also driven by current knowledge of the diseases as well as by clinical managements. Based on large-scale molecular studies and current knowledge, the WHO (World Health Organization) and ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) have updated the classification of urological lesions, particularly renal cell carcinoma (RCC); several newly recognized subtypes, including microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiT) family translocation (TFE3, TFEB, and MITF) RCC, are also documented as rare subtypes. Furthermore, the clinical detection rate of small renal masses (<4 cm in size) is on the rise, but the accurate diagnosis of these small masses still requires tumor tissue for morphological evaluation. Recently developed targeted therapies also demand that tumor tissue be obtained for molecular characterization. Therefore, an accurate diagnosis of a lesion and procurement of tumor tissue are critical steps in appropriate clinical management and the improvement of patients’ prognosis. Most FNAs are performed percutaneously through the abdominal wall anteriorly or by a flank approach posteriorly, under the guidance of CT, MRI, or ultrasound. In addition, endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA (EUS-FNA), are increasingly used in the biopsy of kidney and adrenal lesions in a subset of selected patients. As cytopathologists, we should understand the circumstances under which FNA is most often performed. This chapter summarizes the key FNA findings for cytomorphologic diagnosis of benign, malignant, and metastatic lesions of the kidney and adrenal gland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Eble JN, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Grignon D, et al.; ISUP Renal Tumor Panel. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1469–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delahunt B, Srigley JR. Renal neoplasia: from morphologic to molecular diagnosis. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015;32:87–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delahunt B, Srigley JR. The evolving classification of renal cell neoplasia. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015;32:90–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huimiao J, Chepovetsky J, Zhou M, Sun W, Simsir A, Cohen D, Leung A. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney: diagnosis by fine needle aspiration and review of the literature. Cytojournal. 2015;12:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Argani P, Lal P, Hutchinson B, Lui MY, Reuter VE, Ladanyi M. Aberrant nuclear immunoreactivity for TFE3 in neoplasms with TFE3 gene fusions: a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical assay. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:750–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Argani P. MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2015;32:103–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith NE, Illei PB, Allaf M, Gonzalez N, Morris K, Hicks J, et al. t(6;11) Renal cell carcinoma (RCC): expanded immunohistochemical profile emphasizing novel RCC markers and report of 10 new genetically confirmed cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:604–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Linehan WM. Genetic basis of kidney cancer: role of genomics for the development of disease-based therapeutics. Genome Res. 2012;22:2089–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Riazalhosseini Y, Lathrop M. Precision medicine from the renal cancer genome. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016;12:655–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li S, Shuch BM, Gerstein MB. Whole-genome analysis of papillary kidney cancer finds significant noncoding alterations. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Srinivasan R, Ricketts CJ, Linehan WM. New strategies in renal cell carcinoma: targeting the genetic and metabolic basis of disease. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:10–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature. 2013;499:43–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis CF, Ricketts CJ, Wang M, Yang L, Cherniack AD, Shen H, et al.; The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. The somatic genomic landscape of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:319–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Linehan WM, Spellman PT, Ricketts CJ, Creighton CJ, Fei SS, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of papillary renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:135–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lam AK. Update on adrenal tumours in 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) of endocrine tumours. Endocr Pathol. 2017;28:213–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-017-9484-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Melo-Leite AF, Elias PC, Teixeira SR, Tucci S, Barros GE, Antonini SR, et al. Adrenocortical neoplasms in adulthood and childhood: distinct presentation. Review of the clinical, pathological and imaging characteristics. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;30:253–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Faillot S, Assie G. Endocrine tumors: the genomics of adrenocortical tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174:R249–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dusenbery D, Dekker A. Needle biopsy of the adrenal gland: retrospective review of 54 cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 1996;14:126–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lam KY, Lo CY. Metastatic tumors of the adrenal glands: a 30-year experience in a teaching hospital. Clin Endocrinol. 2002;56:95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bancos I, Tamhane S, Shah M, Delivanis DA, Alahdab F, Arlt W, et al. Diagnosis of endocrine disease: the diagnostic performance of adrenal biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175:R65–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Duregon E, Volante M, Bollito E, Goia M, Buttigliero C, Zaggia B, et al. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors: a lesson from 300 consultation cases. Hum Pathol. 2015;46:1799–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Diaz de Leon A, Pedrosa I. Imaging and screening of kidney cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017;55:1235–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel BN, Bibbey A, Choudhury KR, Leder RA, Nelson RC, Marin D. Characterization of small (<4 cm) focal renal lesions: diagnostic accuracy of spectral analysis using single-phase contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:815–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marcelin C, Ambrosetti D, Bernhard JC, Roy C, Grenier N, Cornelis FH. Percutaneous image-guided biopsies of small renal tumors: current practice and perspectives. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017;98:589–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marconi L, Dabestani S, Lam TB, Hofmann F, Stewart F, Norrie J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous renal tumour biopsy. Eur Urol. 2016;69:660–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang CS, Choi E, Idrees MT, Chen S, Wu HH. Percutaneous biopsy of the renal mass: FNA or core needle biopsy? Cancer Cythopathol. 2017;125:407–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lopes RI, Moura RN, Artifon E. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of kidney lesions: a review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7:253–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jhala NC, Jhala D, Eloubeidi MA, Chhieng DC, Crowe DR, Roberson J, Eltoum I. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the adrenal glands: analysis of 24 patients. Cancer. 2004;102:308–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Vicandi B, López-Ferrer P, González-Peramato P, Pérez-Campos A, Viguer JM. Cytologic features of pheochromocytoma and retroperitoneal paraganglioma: a morphologic and immunohistochemical study of 13 cases. Acta Cytol. 2006;50:372–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo Z, Lloyd RV. Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: an update on recent molecular genetic advances and criteria for malignancy. Adv Anat Pathol. 2015;22:283–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lenders JW, Pacak K, Walther MM, Linehan WM, Mannelli M, Friberg P, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best? JAMA. 2002;287:1427–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. DeMay RM. The art and science of cytopathology, exfoliative cytology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Chicago: ASCP Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cibas ES. Peritoneal washings. In: Cibas ES, Ducatman BS, editors. Cytology: diagnostic principles and clinical correlates. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2014. p. 155–70.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Barkan GA, Wojcik EM. Genitourinary cytopathology (kidney and urinary tract). Cancer Treat Res. 2014;160:149–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chandrasekar T, Ahmad AE, Fadaak K, Jhaveri K, Bhatt JR, Jewett MAS, Finelli A. Natural history of complex renal cysts: clinical evidence supporting active surveillance. J Urol. 2017;199:633–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Weibl P, Hora M, Kollarik B, Kalusova K, Pitra T, Remzi M, et al. A practical guide and decision-making protocol for the management of complex renal cystic masses. Arab J Urol. 2017;15:115–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG, Verhagen PCMS. Bosniak classification for complex renal cysts reevaluated: a systematic review. J Urol. 2017;198:12–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sevcenco S, Spick C, Helbich TH, Heinz G, Shariat SF, Klingler HC, et al. Malignancy rates and diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification for the diagnosis of cystic renal lesions in computed tomography—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2239–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Raso DS, Greene WB, Finley JL, Silverman JF. Morphology and pathogenesis of Liesegang rings in cyst aspirates: report of two cases with ancillary studies. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998;19:116–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stevens S, McClure J. The histochemical features of the Michaelis-Gutmann body and a consideration of the pathophysiological mechanisms of its formation. J Pathol. 1982;137:119–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Leone AR, Kidd LC, Diorio GJ, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Sharma P, Sexton WJ, Spiess PE. Bilateral benign renal oncocytomas and the role of renal biopsy: single institution review. BMC Urol. 2017;17:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu J, Fanning CV. Can renal oncocytomas be distinguished from renal cell carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration specimens? A study of conventional smears in conjunction with ancillary studies. Cancer. 2001;93:390–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou H, Guo M, Gong Y. Challenge of FNA diagnosis of angiomyolipoma: a study of 33 cases. Cancer. 2017;125:257–66.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Reuter VE, Argani P, Zhou M, Delahunt B, Members of the ISUP Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Urologic Pathology Group. Best practices recommendations in the application of immunohistochemistry in the kidney tumors: report from the International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus conference. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:e35–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Salamanca J, Alberti N, López-Ríos F, Perez-Barrios A, Martínez-González MA, de Agustín P. Fine needle aspiration of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Acta Cytol. 2007;51:9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ng KL, Morais C, Bernard A, Saunders N, Samaratunga H, Gobe G, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of immunohistochemical biomarkers that differentiate chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69:661–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Powers CN, Elbadawi A. “Cercariform” cells: a clue to the cytodiagnosis of transitional cell origin of metastatic neoplasms? Diagn Cytopathol. 1995;13:15–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Subhawong AP, Subhawong TK, Li QK. Fine needle aspiration of a metastatic prostate carcinoma simulating a primary adrenal cortical neoplasm: a case report and review of literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2010;38:147–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author sincerely thanks Dr. David Borzik from the Department of Pathology at the Johns Hopkins Hospitals for his help with the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Kay Li M.D., Ph.D., F.C.A.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, Q.K. (2018). Kidney and Adrenal Gland Cytology. In: Jing, X., Siddiqui, M., Li, Q. (eds) Atlas of Non-Gynecologic Cytology . Atlas of Anatomic Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89674-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89674-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89673-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89674-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics