Abstract
In this chapter, we will discuss corporate social responsibility (CSR) from an environmental economics perspective. The discussion is based on existing research and aims to illuminate some concepts and create an explanatory framework for understanding the corporate behavior referred to as CSR and especially the environmental responsibility dimension. We argue that a theory about CSR would have to include trade-offs between personal taste and values, social norms, and market imperfections. The challenge with progressing academic research about CSR would be improving environmental accounting frameworks, both at the national level and at firm level. The system of double bookkeeping needs to be accompanied by environmental, social, and material flows accounts in a more detailed manner than what we see today. If not, any proposed theory about CSR would run the risk of being moot as it would be impossible to put it to the test.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arora, S., & Cason, T. (1999). Do community characteristics influence environmental outcomes? Evidence from the Toxic Release Inventory. Southern Economic Journal,65, 691–716.
Arora, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (1995). Towards a model of over-compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,28, 289–309.
Atkinson, G. (2000). Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,43, 235–252.
Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,10, 7–45.
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica,77, 1–19.
Bergman, L. (1995). Simple observation on the green firm. In R. Wolff & B. E. Ytterhus (Eds.), Environmental management: Where do we stand? Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
Blend, J. R., & Ravenswaay, E. O. (1999). Measuring the demand for eco-labeled apples. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,81, 1072–1077.
Bolvig, I. (2005). Firm-provided social concerns? Just another compensating wage differentials story? International Journal of Manpower, 26, 673–704.
Brännlund, R., & Lundgren, T. (2009). Environmental policy without costs? A review of the Porter hypothesis. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics,3, 75–117.
Dam, L., & Scholtens, L. (2015). Toward a theory of responsible investing: On the economic foundations of corporate social responsibility. Resource and Energy Economics,41, 103–121.
Dodd, M. (1932). For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45, 145–163.
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics,101, 612–640.
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2010). Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings. American Economic Review,100, 2492–2509.
Elhauge, E. R. (2005). Corporate manager’s operational discretion to sacrifice corporate profits in the public interest. In B. L. Hay, R. N. Stavins, & R. Vietor (Eds.), Environmental protection and the social responsibility of firms: Perspectives from law, economics, and business. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Fernando, C. S., Sharfman, M. P., & Uysal, V. B. (2017). Corporate environmental policy and shareholder value: Following the smart money. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,52(5), 2023–2051.
Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics,122(3), 585–606.
Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.
Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxic release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,28, 98–113.
Hay, B. L., Stavins, R. N., & Vietor, R. (Eds.). (2005). Environmental protection and the social responsibility of firms: Perspectives from law, economics, and business. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Innes, R., & Sam, A. G. (2008). Voluntary pollution reductions and the enforcement of environmental law: An empirical study of the 33/50 program. Journal of Law and Economics,51, 271–296.
Khanna, M., & Anton, W. Q. (2002). What is driving corporate environmentalism: Opportunity or threat? Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9, 409–417.
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature,50, 51–84.
Kriström, B., & Lundgren, T. (2003). Abatement investments and green goodwill. Applied Economics,35, 1915–1923.
Lundgren, T. (2011). A micro-economic model of corporate social responsibility. Metroeconomica,62, 69–95.
Lundgren, T., & Marklund, P.-O. (2014). Climate policy, environmental performance, and profits. Journal of Productivity Analysis,44(3), 225–235.
Lundgren, T., & Olsson, R. (2010). Environmental incidents and firm value—International evidence using a multi-factor event study framework. Applied Financial Economics,20, 1293–1307.
Lundgren, T., & Wenchao, Z. (2017). Firm performance and the role of environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management,203, 330–341.
Mandell, S., & Wilhemsson, M. (2011). Willingness to pay for sustainable housing. Housing Journal of Research,20, 35–51.
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good … and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866371.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review,26, 117–127.
Nyborg, K., & Zhang, T. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility associated with lower wages? Environmental & Resource Economics,55, 107–117.
Paul, C., & Siegel, D. (2006). Special issue on corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis,26, 207–287.
Porter, M. (1991, April). America’s Green Strategy. Scientific American, p. 264.
Porter, M., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives,9, 97–118.
Portney, P. R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and public policy perspective. In B. L. Hay, R. N. Stavins, & R. Vietor (Eds.), Environmental protection and the social responsibility of firms: Perspectives from law, economics, and business. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Reinhardt, F. L., Stavins, R. N., & Vietor, R. (2008). Corporate social responsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental and Economics and Policy,2, 219–239.
Wirl, F., Feichtinger, G., & Kort, P. M. (2013). Individual firm and market dynamics of CSR activities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,86, 169–182.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lundgren, T., Dam, L., Scholtens, B. (2019). Sustainable Business Practices—An Environmental Economics Perspective. In: Arvidsson, S. (eds) Challenges in Managing Sustainable Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93265-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93266-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)