Abstract
This chapter is focusing on the specific role of professional associations as proactive organizations in the development of public policies addressing sustainable local and regional development. This topic is demonstrated on the examples of a model for shared neighborhood development and a monitoring and evaluation standard for the urban environment of Sofia. The need for a more thorough approach in local community planning and design along with monitoring and evaluation of the urban environment has been identified through a series of actions and arenas related to Sofia. The approach of the Association of Bulgarian Urban and Regional Planners is described and argumented through the methods for studying the issue and the way in which it is addressed, including the phases of designing, texting and applying action research and standards in the decision-making process. The efforts of the ABURP try to establish further an urban culture both deep grass-roots and canopy farsighted around the tree of problems and solutions for the environment of Sofia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander C (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press, New York
Allmendinger P (2002) Planning theory. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Amin A, Thrift N (1995) Globalisation and institutional thickness. In: Healey P, Cameron S, Davoudi S, Graham C, Madanipour A (eds) Managing cities: the new urban context. Wiley, Chichester, pp 91–108
Appleyard D, Gerson MS, Lintell M (1981) Liveable streets. University of California Press, London
Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4):216–224
Association of Bulgarian Urban and Regional Planners (ABURP) (2016a) Urban Development Forum. http://bgplanning.org/projects/forum-za-gradsko-razvitie/. Accessed 12.02.2018
Association of Bulgarian Urban and Regional Planners (ABURP) (2016b) Model of shared development of vital urban environment in city of Sofia – “Tsar InavAsen II” str. and “Yavorov” residential quarter. http://bgplanning.org/projects/spodeli-kvartala/. Accessed 12.02.2018
Association of Bulgarian Urban and Regional Planners (ABURP) (2017) Establishment of standard for evaluation and monitoring of quality of the urban environment. http://bgplanning.org/projects/gradski-standart/. Accessed 12.02.2018
Campbell S (2003) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. In: Campbell S, Fainstein S (eds) Readings in planning theory, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
Castells М (2008) Space of flows, space of places: materials for a theory of urbanism in the information age. In: Haas T (ed) New urbanism and beyond: designing cities for the future. Rizzoli International Publications, New York
Centre for Study of Democracy (CSD) (2016) State capture unplugged: Countering administrative and political corruption in Bulgaria: http://www.csd.bg/artShow.php?id=17723. Accessed 12.02.2018
COST Action C20 (2009) Urban Knowledge Arenas: re-thinking urban knowledge and innovation. Final report of COST action C20. http://www.cost.eu/module/download/7518. Accessed 12.02.2018
Davoudi S, Shaw K, Haider LJ, Quinlan AE, Peterson GD, Wilkinson C, Fünfgeld H, McEvoy D, Porter L (2012) Resilience: a bridging. concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice 13(2):299–333
Dempster MBL (1998) A self-organizing systems perspective on planning for sustainability. A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Planning, Waterloo, ON. http://www.bethd.ca/pubs/mesthe.pdf. Accessed 12.02.2018
Dichev I (2010) Sluchvaniya na Grada Otdolu [Grassroots approach in city implementations]. https://www.seminar-bg.eu/spisanie-seminar-bg/broy2/item/240-sluchvaniya-na-grada-otdolu.html. Accessed 12.02.2018
Dimitrova E (1999) Ustoychivost na gradskoto razvitie. Gordost I predrazsadatsi v prostranstvenoto planirane na postindustrialniya grad, Nauchna konferentsiya s mezhdunarodno uchastie “Arhitekturata kato izkustvo – 50 godini arhitekturni izsledvaniya v BAN” [Sustainablity in urban development. Pride and prejudice in spatial planning of postindustrial city, Scientific conference with international participation “The Architecture as an Art – 50 years of scientific research in Bulgarian Academy of Science”], BAS, Sofia
Dinev I (2016) Studentski Grad na Studentite!“ Edna Istoriya za Pravoto varhu Grada” [Student’s City to the Students! A story about the right to the city]. http://dversia.net/1102/pravoto-varhu-grada/. Accessed 12.02.2018
EC (2017) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. On Progress in Bulgaria under the Co-operation and Verification Mechanism. COM (2017) 750 final. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/comm-2017-750_en_0.pdf. Accessed 12.02.2018
EkoObshtnost (2014) Idei za po-efektiven Dialog Mezhdu Grazhdani I Stolichna Obshtina [Ideas for more effective dialogue between citizens and Sofia Municipality]. http://bepf-bg.org/идеи-за-по-ефективен-диалог-между-граж-2. Accessed 12.02.2018
EU (2016) Report from the Commission to the Council on the Urban Agenda for the EU. COM(2017) 657 final:https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/celex3a52017dc06573aen3atxt.pdf. Accessed 12.02.2018
Flyvbjerg B (2002) Planning and foucault: in search of the dark side of planning theory. In: Allmendinger P, Tewdwr-Jones M (eds) Planning futures: new directions for planning theory. Routledge, London, pp 44–62
Forester J (2007) Planning in the Face of Power, Journal of the American Planning Association, 48:1, 67–80
Friedmann J (1973) Retracking America: a theory of transactive planning. Doubleday/Anchor, Garden City
Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Friedmann J (2003) Why do planning theory? Planning Theory 2003; 2; 7. (2011) Insurgencies: essays in planning theory. Routledge, New York
Grazhdanska Initsiativa Za Obshtestven I Relsov Transport (2015) Monthly Archives: November 2015: https://obshtestven.wordpress.com/2015/11/. Accessed 12.02.2018
Grupa Grad (2013) Kritika [Ctiticism]: http://www.grupagrad.com/. Accessed 12.02.2018
Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2003) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
Hacking N, Flynn A (2017) Networks, power and knowledge in the planning system: a case study of energy from waste. Progress in Planning 113:1–37
Harvey D (1985) The urbanization of capital. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p xvii, 239
Harvey D (2008) The right to the city. New Left Review II(53):23–40
Healey P (1992) Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. The Town Planning Review 62(2):143–162
Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning – shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, London
Institute for Market Economics (IME) (2017) Democratic Backsliding in Bulgaria. http://ime.bg/bg/articles/otstyplenieto-na-demokraciyata-v-bylgariya/. Accessed 12.02.2018
“Let Nature Remain in Bulgaria” Coalition (2012) Aarhus convention - the new beginning for Bulgarian spatial planning in the favor of citizens. http://forthenature.org/news/2504. Accessed 2.02.2018
“Let Nature Remain in Bulgaria” Coalition (2018a) Sluchai [Cases]. http://forthenature.org/cases. Accessed 12.02.2018
“Let Nature Remain in Bulgaria” Coalition (2018b) Uchastie za Prirodata [Participaion for Nature]. http://forthenature.org/uchastie-za-prirodata, Accessed 12.02.2018
Marcuse P (2009) From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City 13(2–3):185–197
National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria (2003–2016) Zakon za Kamarite na Architektite I Inzhenerite v Investicionnoto Proektirane [Law of Chambers of Architects and Engineers in Investment Design]. State Gazzette
Piattoni S (2009) Multi-level governance: a historical and conceptual analysis. European Integration. 31(2):163–180
Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) (1998) Doors to democracy: current trends and practices in public participation in environmental decisionmaking in Central and Eastern Europe. http://archive.rec.org/REC/Publications/PPDoors/CEE/PPDoorsCEE.pdf. Accessed 12.02.2018
Sofia for Us (2007) Tazhn ivesti [Sad news]: http://sofiazanas.blogspot.bg/2007/11/blog-post_8153.html. Accessed 12.02.2018
Sofia Green Capital (2018) Za Nas [About us ]: https://sofiagreencapital.org/за-нас. Accessed 12.02.2018
Spasi Sofia (2015) Zapochvame [We start]. http://spasisofia.org/bg/започваме.html. Accessed12.02.2018
Szelenyi (1983) Urban inequalities: under state socialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Transformatori Association (2018) Komunarchia. https://transformatori.net/komunarhia/. Accessed 12.02.2018
UN (2016) Habitat III Policy paper 6: Urban spatial strategies: land market and segregation: http://habitat3.org/file/524217/view/572975. Accessed 12.02.2018
UNECE (2018) Bulgaria Decision V/9d. https://www.unece.org/environmental-policy/treaties/public-participation/aarhus-convention/envpptfwg/envppcc/envppccimplementation/fifth-meeting-of-the-parties-2014/bulgaria-decision-v9d.html. Accessed 12.02.2018
Venkov N (2014) Konspiratsii okolo Zhenskiya Pazar [Conspiracies about “Woman’s market”]: https://www.seminar-bg.eu/spisanie-seminar-bg/broy10b/item/417-konspiracii-okolo-zhenskiya-pazar.html. Accessed 12.02.2018
Viziya za Sofia (2018) ZaViziata [About the Vision]: https://vizia.sofia.bg/sofia-vision/. Accessed 12.02.2018
Whata (2018) Whata awards. http://whata.org/awards/ Accessed 12.02.2018
Williamson O (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22(2):233–261
Yanchev P (2014) Epizodi na Urbanistichen Aktivizam v Sofiya – Gradskite Publichni Prostranstva Mezhdu Institutsii i Grazhdani [Episodes of urbanistic activism in Sofia – city public spaces between institutions and citizens]. https://www.seminar-bg.eu/spisanie-seminar-bg/broy10b/item/420-epizodi-na-urbanistichen-aktivizam-v-sofia.html. Accessed 12.02.2018
ZaZemiata (2018) Deynosti po Upravlenie na Otpadatsite v gr. Sofiya [Waste management activities in tne City of Sofia]. http://zazemiata.org/v1/Sofija.273.0.html. Accessed 12.02.2018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burov, A., Madzihirski, V., Mutafchiiska, I. (2019). Professional Associations as Public Actors in the Formulation and Implementation of Spatial Development Policies. Key Study Monitoring and Evaluation Standard for the Urban Environment of Sofia. In: Finka, M., Jaššo, M., Husár, M. (eds) The Role of Public Sector in Local Economic and Territorial Development. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93575-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93575-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93574-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93575-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)