Skip to main content

Monitoring the Software Development Process with Process Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 319))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Software projects typically need to be monitored in detail regarding when what was done in order to demonstrate adherence to methodologies, rules, regulations, guidelines or best practices. To this end, it is of utmost importance to obtain factual knowledge from empirical evidence about the actual software development process. A major problem in this context is the lack of a centralized control of by a central system. Although it is hard to obtain full knowledge of the overall software development process, several cues can be gathered by analyzing pieces of information that are stored by supporting IT systems (e.g., issue trackers and version control). This position paper presents research in progress for extracting process knowledge from the historical data of software artifacts. This work extends the applicability of process mining techniques to software processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.scrum.org.

  2. 2.

    http://www.promtools.org.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Data Science in Action. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Abate, P., Boender, J., Di Cosmo, R., Zacchiroli, S.: Strong dependencies between software components. In: 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2009, pp. 89–99 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aggarwal, C., Zhai, C.: Mining Text Data. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3223-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Agrawal, K., Aschauer, M., Thonhofer, T., Bala, S., Rogge-Solti, A., Tomsich, N.: Resource classification from version control system logs. In: EDOC Workshop, pp. 249–258, September 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. Akbarinasaji, S., Caglayan, B., Bener, A.: Predicting bug-fixing time: a replication study using an open source software project. J. Syst. Softw. 136, 173–186 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bala, S., Cabanillas, C., Mendling, J., Rogge-Solti, A., Polleres, A.: Mining project-oriented business processes. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H.R., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9253, pp. 425–440. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bala, S., Revoredo, K., de A.R. Gonçalves, J.C., Baião, F., Mendling, J., Santoro, F.: Uncovering the hidden co-evolution in the work history of software projects. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 164–180. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, T.H., Thomas, S.W., Hassan, A.E.: A survey on the use of topic models when mining software repositories. Empir. Softw. Eng. 21(5), 1843–1919 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Ambros, M., Lanza, M., Lungu, M.: Visualizing co-change information with the evolution radar. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(5), 720–735 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de A.R. Gonçalves, J.C., Santoro, F.M., Baião, F.A.: Let me tell you a story - on how to build process models. J. UCS 17(2), 276–295 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kindler, E., Rubin, V., Schäfer, W.: Activity mining for discovering software process models. Softw. Eng. 79, 175–180 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kindler, E., Rubin, V., Schäfer, W.: Incremental workflow mining based on document versioning information. In: Li, M., Boehm, B., Osterweil, L.J. (eds.) SPW 2005. LNCS, vol. 3840, pp. 287–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11608035_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Leopold, H. (ed.): Natural Language in Business Process Models. LNBIP, vol. 168. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04175-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J.E., Lyytinen, K.: Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: a study of an open source software project. Inf. Syst. Res. 27(4), 751–772 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mendling, J., Leopold, H., Pittke, F.: 25 challenges of semantic process modeling. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Softw. Eng. Big Co. 1(1), 78–94 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pinzger, M., Kim, S.: Guest editorial: mining software repositories. Empir. Softw. Eng. 21(5), 2033–2034 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Poncin, W., Serebrenik, A., van den Brand, M.: Process mining software repositories. In: 2011 15th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR), pp. 5–14. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Richetti, P.H.P., de A.R. Gonçalves, J.C., Baião, F.A., Santoro, F.M.: Analysis of knowledge-intensive processes focused on the communication perspective. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds.) BPM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10445, pp. 269–285. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65000-5_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin, V., Günther, C.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Kindler, E., van Dongen, B.F., Schäfer, W.: Process mining framework for software processes. In: Wang, Q., Pfahl, D., Raffo, D.M. (eds.) ICSP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4470, pp. 169–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72426-1_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruohonen, J., Hyrynsalmi, S., Leppänen, V.: Time series trends in software evolution. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 27(12), 990–1015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, S.W., Hassan, A.E., Blostein, D.: Mining unstructured software repositories. In: Mens, T., Serebrenik, A., Cleve, A. (eds.) Evolving Software Systems, pp. 139–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45398-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Weicheng, Y., Shen, B., Xu, B.: Mining GitHub: why commit stops - exploring the relationship between developer’s commit pattern and file version evolution. In: Muenchaisri, P., Rothermel, G. (eds.) APSEC 2013, Ratchathewi, Thailand, 2–5 December 2013, vol. 2, pp. 165–169. IEEE Computer Society (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zaidman, A., Rompaey, B.V., Demeyer, S., van Deursen, A.: Mining software repositories to study co-evolution of production & test code. In: ICST, pp. 220–229. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saimir Bala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bala, S., Mendling, J. (2018). Monitoring the Software Development Process with Process Mining. In: Shishkov, B. (eds) Business Modeling and Software Design. BMSD 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 319. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94214-8_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94213-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94214-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics