Abstract
The results showed that: (1) information Technology alliance of balanced scorecard to make a difference in the business. A total of 66 to share the information for senior executives of eight of the information technology executive with a total of 20 patents and information for management at the number 38 and by the many more who do not accept the information as significant. Statistic of 0.05.
All of this evidence. The innovative concept is considered in the analysis and design information that is appropriate for the agency. Creating a competitive advantage by using IT as a business tool. Using IT queue. To solve business problems, including quality tools. Air Quality Methodology Balance Scorecard. The integration of information science. Including analysis and design of information systems for organizations. And computer tools, including design input – processing –released. Correlation analysis of the information contained in each (stepwise Refinement) by the model information. That represents the relationship in the form of tables. Three-dimensional matrix, the people who want to bring this concept to the development of Information systems should understand before applying to the agency’s next.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sungrung, P.: Production management. Suan Dusit Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand (2003)
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Publications the President and Fellows of Harvard College (1996)
Chookittikul, J.: Quality information technology. Computer and Advanced Technology, 8th edn., vol. 8, pp. 8–9. Phetchaburi Thailand (2005)
Asosheh, A., Nalchigar, S., Jamporazmey, M.: Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 5931–5938 (2010).
Rajesh, R., Pugazhendhi, S., Ganesh, K., Ducq, Y., Lenny Koh, S.C.: Generic balanced scorecard framework for third party logistics service provider. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140, 269–282 (2012)
Kadarova, J., Durkacova, M., Kalafusova, L.: Balanced scorecard as an issue taught in the field of industrial engineering. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 143, 174–179 (2014)
Amado, C.A.F., Santos, S.P., Marques, P.M.: Integrating the data envelopment analysis and the balanced scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega 40, 390–403 (2012)
Jalaliyoon, N., Bakar, N.A., Taherdoost, H.: Propose a methodology to implement balanced scorecard for operational appraisal of industrial groups. In: The 7th International Conference Interdisciplinary in Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 659–666 (2014)
Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P.: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm, 9th edn. Person Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Suksangaram, W., Wongrat, K., Klamsakul, S. (2019). Balanced Scorecard Quality Information Dashboards Model for Competitive Business Advantage. In: Theeramunkong, T., et al. Advances in Intelligent Informatics, Smart Technology and Natural Language Processing. iSAI-NLP 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 807. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94703-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94703-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94702-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94703-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)