Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Considering Qualitative Approaches That May Benefit from Using Naturally Occurring Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Using Naturally Occurring Data in Qualitative Health Research

  • 842 Accesses

Abstract

It is recognised in the literature that some qualitative approaches favour naturally occurring data over researcher-generated, resulting in some healthy debates within the qualitative community. This is not to dismiss the value of researcher-generated methods, as many qualitative researchers see the value of these methods for addressing certain types of questions. Rather, the types of research questions asked and developed by some perspectives are better addressed by collecting naturally occurring data, and therefore this approach to data collection is favoured. In this chapter, we outline the approaches that favour this type of data, and also illustrate how it can be beneficial for a range of different qualitative perspectives that may typically use researcher-generated approaches. The chapter contains practical advice, as well as a general overview of the common qualitative perspectives, in relation to the use of naturally occurring data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alder, J. (2013). Media portrayal of mentally disordered offenders: A case study. Mental Health Practice, 19(7), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. (2012). What is social constructionism? The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 11(1), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C. (2011). Six kinds of applied conversation analysis. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk (pp. 1–4). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P. (2003). The origins of qualitative psychology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 4–25). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attard, A., & Coulson, N. (2012). A thematic analysis of patient communication in Parkinson’s disease online support group discussion forums. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 500–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, H. A., Singe, M., & Susser, I. (1997). Medical anthropology and the world system. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. (1998). Why doesn’t audit work? British Medical Journal, 316, 875–876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Biggerstaff, D. (2012). Qualitative research methods in psychology. In G. Rossi (Ed.), Psychology—Selected papers (pp. 175–206). Coatioa: InTech Open Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. R. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, G., & Robinson, J. (2011). Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation. Journal of Communication, 61, 94–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, D. J. (2000). Ethnography. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burck, C. (2005). Comparing qualitative research methodologies for systemic research: The use of grounded theory, discourse analysis and narrative analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 27(3), 237–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13 Retrieved January 1, 2012 from http://www.ualberta.ca/iiqm/backissues/pdf/caellietal.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, S., & Cropper, S. (2009). Investing in lay researchers for community-based health action research: Implications for research, policy and practice. Critical Public Health, 19(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & I. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: Practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenitz, C., & Swanson, J. (1986). From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction of meaning. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, L., & Ugarriza, D. (2000). The concept of a theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(3), 351–372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. (2015). Conversation analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology (pp. 139–159). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P., Heritage, J., Lerner, G., & Pomerantz, A. (2015). Introduction. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Talking about troubles in conversation (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, S. (2010). Exploring criminogenic need through victim apology letters: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research, 2(2), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • East, L., & Robinson, J. (1994). Change in process: Bringing about change in health care through action research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 3(1), 57–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eastham, L. (2011). Research using blogs for data: Public documents or private musings? Research in Nursing and Health, 34, 353–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (2003). Death and furniture: Arguments against relativism. In M. Gergen & K. Gergen (Eds.), Social construction: A reader (pp. 231–236). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faircloth, C. A., Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., & Gubrium, J. F. (2005). Constructing the stroke: Sudden-onset narratives of stroke survivors. Qualitative Health Research, 15(7), 928–941.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (1991). A linguistic approach to narrative. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(1), 15–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgaca, E. (2014). Discourse analytic research on mental distress: A critical overview. Journal of Mental Health, 23(2), 55–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (2004). Old-stream psychology will disappear with the dinosaurs; Kenneth Gergen in conversation with Peter Mattes and Ermst Schraube. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-5.3.553 (online).

  • Gergen, K. (2009). An invitation to social constructionism (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (2007). Constructivist grounded theory? Historical Social Research, Supplement, 19, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. F. (1975). Living and dying at Murray Manor. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (2008). The constructionist mosaic. In J. Holstein & J. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. M. (2011). Narrative methods in a study of trauma recovery. Qualitative Health Research, 21(1), 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (2006). Discourse analysis. In M. Slade & S. Priebe (Eds.), Choosing methods in mental health research: Mental health research from theory to practice (pp. 47–67). Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004). Developing a grounded theory approach: A comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(2), 141–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. (2017). Transcribing for research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. Fitch & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. (2011). ‘Some’ versus ‘any’ medical issues: encouraging patients to reveal their unmet concerns. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: intervention and change in institutional talk (pp. 15–31). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. S. (1988). Adolescent hopefulness in illness and health. Advances in Nursing Science, 10(3), 79–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinnant, A. (2009). The cancer on your coffee table: A discourse analysis of the health content in mass-circulated women’s magazines. Feminist Media Studies, 9(3), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In D. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56–68). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2003). Nurses talking to patients: Exploring conversation analysis as a means of researching nurse-patient communication. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40, 609–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, L., & Fine, M. (1987). Qualitative and quantitative methods: When stories converge. In M. Mark & L. Shotland (Eds.), New directions in program evaluation (pp. 57–75). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organisational research (pp. 256–270). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (2012). Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 426–450). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, S., & Lester, J. N. (2014). Naming and un-naming a research study “participatory”. The Qualitative Report, 19(23), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar, D. M. (2016). Depression narratives in blogs: A collaborative quest for coherence. Qualitative health research, 26(9), 1203–1215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprell, K., & Braithwaite, J. (2017). When patients tell their own stories: A meta-narrative study of web-based personalized texts of 214 melanoma patients’ journeys in four countries. Qualitative Health Research, 28(10), 1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317742623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. N. (2014). Negotiating abnormality/normality in therapy talk: A discursive psychology approach to the study of therapeutic interactions and children with autism. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J., & O’Reilly, M. (2019). Applied conversation analysis: Social interaction in institutional settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lett, J. (1990). Emics and etics: Notes on the epistemology of anthropology. In T. Headland, K. Pike, & M. Harris (Eds.), Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. frontiers of anthropology (Vol. 7, pp. 127–142). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochmiller, C., & Lester, J. N. (2017). An introduction to educational research: connecting methods to practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D., & Clayman, S. (2003). Ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. In L. Reynolds & N. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 173–202). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D., & Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction and medical communication. Medical Education, 39, 428–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, R. (2006). Conversation analysis. In M. Slade & S. Priebe (Eds.), Choosing methods in mental health research: Mental health research from theory to practice (pp. 24–46). Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2015). Doing research in counselling and psychotherapy (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A. (2010). Discourse analysis: An overview for the neophyte researcher. Journal of Health and Social Care Improvement, 1, 1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mulveen, R., & Hepworth, J. (2006). An interpretive phenomenological analysis of participation in a pro-anorexia internet site and its relationship with disordered eating. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(2), 283–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. (2003). Narrative psychology. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 111–131). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naslund, J. A., Grande, S. W., Aschbrenner, K. A., & Elwyn, G. (2014). Naturally occurring peer support through social media: The experiences of individuals with severe mental illness using YouTube. PLoS One, 9(10), e110171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noblit, G. W., Flores, S., & Murillo, E. G. (2004). Postcritical ethnography: An introduction. In G. W. Noblit, S. Y. Flores, & E. G. Murillo Jr. (Eds.), Postcritical ethnography: Reinscribing critique (pp. 1–52). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, P. (2012). Population health and social governance analyzing the mainstream incorporation of ethnography. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 859–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, M., & Lester, J. (2017). Examining mental health through social constructionism: The language of mental health. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2014). “She needs a smack in the gob”: Negotiating what is appropriate talk in front of children in family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 36(3), 287–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 200–221). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, M., Caine, V., & Goez, H. (2015). The encounters and challenges of ethnography as a methodology in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, F., & Robinson, J. (2004). Interobserver agreement on first-stage conversation analytic transcription. Health Communication Research, 30(3), 376–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenwald, G., & Ochberg, R. L. (1992). Introduction: Life stories, cultural politics, and self-understanding. In G. Rosenwalk & R. Ochberg (Eds.), Storied lives: The cultural politics of self-understanding (pp. 1–20). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann-Erikson, M. (2017). Using participatory action research to develop a working model that enhances psychiatric nurses’ professionalism: The architecture of stability. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44(6), 888–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P. (2004). Conversation analysis methodology. Language Learning, 54(s1), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1992). Towards an analysis of discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 1–34). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (1983). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 3(3), 68–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, A., & Charmaz, K. (2012). Grounded theory methods for mental health practitioners. In D. Harper & A. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 131–146). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., … Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence: Summary. Retrieved December 10, 2017 from, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11852/

  • Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witham, G., Haigh, C., Mitchell, D., & Beddow, A. (2017). Carer experience supporting someone with dementia and cancer: A narrative approach. Qualitative Health Research, 28(5), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317736285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Political Science, University of Chester, Chester, Cheshire, UK

    Nikki Kiyimba

  2. School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Jessica Nina Lester

  3. The Greenwood Institute of Child Health, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK

    Michelle O’Reilly

Authors
  1. Nikki Kiyimba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Nina Lester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michelle O’Reilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kiyimba, N., Lester, J.N., O’Reilly, M. (2019). Considering Qualitative Approaches That May Benefit from Using Naturally Occurring Data. In: Using Naturally Occurring Data in Qualitative Health Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94839-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94839-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94838-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94839-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation