Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Multilingual Education ((MULT,volume 29))

Abstract

The recent growth of writing initiatives in Central and Eastern Europe has created a situation where the natural solution is to look to countries where models for teaching writing are well established, most notably the US, but also to a lesser extent the UK. While the US provides highly developed models for teaching and supporting writing in English as a first language at the undergraduate level and in the context of a liberal arts model of higher education, the UK offers models for teaching writing in English as a second language at the graduate level so as to integrate them into the British education system. Neither of these models considers what it might be like to teach writing in a first language other than English or in English in a non-English-speaking country. In this sense, transferring models across new contexts involves a degree of risk for mismatch. In this chapter, I deconstruct the options available to those teaching writing in Romania and consider how institutions can combine elements in new ways in order to create a European model of writing support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the words of one assistant professor I knew, “only one more year of legal writing and I’m out of here!”

References

  • Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2016). What is a 21st century liberal education? Retrieved from Association of American Colleges & Universities website: https://aacu.org/leap/what-is-a-liberal-education

  • Brooks, J. (1991). Minimalist tutoring: Making the student do all the work. Writing Lab Newsletter, 15(6), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, S., & Rafoth, B. A. (Eds.). (2004). ESL writers: A guide for writing center tutors. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carino, P. (2002). Reading our own words: Rhetorical analysis and the institutional discourse of writing centers. In Writing center research: extending the conversation (pp. 91–110). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapel Hill, Writing Center. (2014). Fragments and run-ons. Retrieved from Chapel Hill Writing Center website: http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/fragments-and-run-ons/

  • Clark, I. L., & Healy, D. (1996). Are writing centers ethical? WPA: Writing Program Administration, 20(1/2), 32–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coventry University. (2016). Centre for academic writing. Retrieved from Coventry University Centre for Academic Writing website: http://www.coventry.ac.uk/study-at-coventry/student-support/academic-support/centre-for-academic-writing/

  • Downs, D., & Wardle, E. (2007). Teaching about writing, righting misconceptions: (Re) envisioning “first-year composition” as “Introduction to Writing Studies”. College Composition and Communication, 58(4), 552–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else, H. (2015). Too many PhDs, not enough tenured positions. Times Higher Education. May 28, 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/content/too-many-phds-not-enough-tenured-positions

  • Enkvist, N. E. (1997). Why we need contrastive rhetoric. Alternation, 4(1), 188–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbord, J. (2003). Minimalist tutoring–an exportable model? The Writing Lab Newsletter, 28(4), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbord, J. (2010). Writing in Central and Eastern Europe: Stakeholders and directions in initiating change. Across the Disciplines, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, R. R. (1980). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzhaber, A. R. (1963). Themes, theories, and therapy: The teaching of writing in college. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, O. (2000). Keine Angst vor dem leeren Blatt: ohne Schreibblockaden durchs Studium (vol. 16). Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leki, I., & Carson, J. G. (1994). Students’ perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelms, G., & Dively, R. L. (2007). Perceived roadblocks to transferring knowledge from first-year composition to writing-intensive major courses: A pilot study. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 31(1–2), 214–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, S. M. (1984). The idea of a writing center. College English, 46(5), 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (2001). English for globalisation or for the world’s people? International Review of Education, 47(3–4), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, R., & Koivula, J. (2008). The dilemmas of the changing university. In M. Shattock (Ed.), Entrepreneurialism in Universities and the Knowledge Economy: Diversification and Organizational Change (pp. 183–199). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. R. (1991). Writing in the academic disciplines, 1870–1990: A curricular history. Order Dept., Southern Illinois University Press, PO Box 3697, Carbondale, IL 62902-3697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoon, L. K., & Burns, D. H. (1995). A critique of pure tutoring. The Writing Center Journal, 15(2), 134–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (Vol. 1). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Harbord .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harbord, J. (2018). A European Model for Writing Support. In: Chitez, M., Doroholschi, C., Kruse, O., Salski, Ł., Tucan, D. (eds) University Writing in Central and Eastern Europe: Tradition, Transition, and Innovation. Multilingual Education, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95198-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95198-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95197-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95198-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics