Skip to main content

Research in Public Policies for Aging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aging Research - Methodological Issues

Abstract

Evidence-based decision-making is an imperative for conducting effective policies, particularly in the case of aging. Systematic research can contribute to better decision making by clarifying concepts, allowing us to place an issue into a larger theoretical framework and by providing evidence on what works. It can help to assess the efficacy, efficiency and legitimacy of different policy alternatives. Finally, it can inform of the potential problems that could be faced and present evidence of the effectiveness of the adopted policies. This chapter offers a brief review of the contributions that researchers can make at different stages in the policy cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aguilar LF (1991) El estudio de las políticas públicas. Ed. Miguel Ángel Porrúa, México

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ripley RB (1985) Stages of the policy process. In: Daniel CM (ed) Public policy theories, models, and concepts: an anthology. Ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Assembly on Aging (1983) A neglected área in the field of population and human rights: ageing and the aged. United Nations, New York, pp 102–109

    Google Scholar 

  4. Immergut E (1998) The rules of the game. The logic of policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden. In: Steinmo S, Thelen K, Longstreth F (eds) Structuring politics. Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller ER, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, Guallar E (2005) Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 142(1):37–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lipsky M (2010) Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. Ed.: dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cornia GA, Stewart F (1995) Two errors targeting. In: van de Walle D, Nead K (eds) Public spending and the poor. Theory and evidence. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Osuna JL, Marquez C (2000) Guía para la evaluación de políticas públcas. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lasswell HD (1970) The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sci 1(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caplan NA (1979) The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. Am Behav Sci 22:459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman J (2014) Revisiting the ‘two-communities’ metaphor of research utilization. Int J Public Sect Manage 27:614–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leviton LC, Hughes EFX (1981) Research on the utilization of evaluations. A review and synthesis. Eval Rev 5(4):525–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Landry R, Amara N, Lamaru M (2001) Climbing the ladder of research utilization: evidence from social science research. Sci Commun 22:396–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mulgan G, Puttick R (2003) The case for new institutions. Nesta, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Caro-López, E., Velasco-Sánchez, E. (2018). Research in Public Policies for Aging. In: García-Peña, C., Gutiérrez-Robledo, L., Pérez-Zepeda, M. (eds) Aging Research - Methodological Issues. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95387-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics