Abstract
Star Trek indicates three distinct politics resulting from the creation of a global society: (1) Federation; (2) Empire; and (3) Neoliberalism. The federation path to world government is predicated on the concept of justice known in the academic literature on Star Trek as “liberal humanism”—a classless society, free of gender/ethnic bias. The justice (i.e. liberal humanism) evident in federation inspires others to become part of the global polity. The Empire strategy of establishing global governance relies on national, religious (for Star Trek “species”) identity. Within Empire, a particular identity group seeks to politically impose themselves on other (species) societies. They do so through military (violent) means and deception—claiming racial/political superiority in the process. The proponents of neoliberalism argue for a global regime based on practical considerations—expanding trade relations and bolstering international security. Star Trek indicates that a political basis of neoliberalism is the WE/THEY distinction—à la Carl Schmitt. Utilizing these templates, as set out in Star Trek, it can be concluded that the American-led global hegemonic system contains characteristics from all three templates. Star Trek suggests, however, that only the federation route to global government is viable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
“A Grave Warning on Russian Meddling.” New York Times, January 11, 2018, A26.
A Minority Staff Report Prepared for the Use of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate. Putin’s Asymmetric Assault on Democracy in Russia and Europe: Implications for U.S. National Security. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2018.
Anderson, Terry H. Bush’s Wars. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Biena, David Van. “Spock’s Jewish Roots.” In Leonard Nimoy (1931–2015): Remembering the Man Behind Spock. New York: Entertainment Weekly, 2015.
Bernardi, Daniel Leonard. Star Trek and History: Race-ing Toward a White Future. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998.
Blair, Karin. Meaning in Star Trek. New York: Warner, 1977.
Blair, Karin. “The Garden in the Machine: The Why of Star Trek.” Journal of Popular Culture 13, no. 2 (Fall 1979): 310–319.
Caplan, Jane. Nazi Germany. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Clines, Francis X. “Reagan Denounces Ideology of Soviet as ‘Focus of Evil’.” New York Times, March 9, 1983, Web.
Drolet, Jean-François. American Neoconservatism: The Politics and Culture of a Reactionary Idealism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
Drury, Shadia B. Leo Strauss and the American Right. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997.
Duffield, John S. Fuels Paradise: Seeking Energy Security in Europe, Japan, and the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015.
Duménil, Gérard, and Dominique Lévy. Capital Resurgent: Roots of the Neoliberal Revolution, trans. by Derek Jeffers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Egan, Michelle. Single Markets: Economic Integration in Europe and the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Fioretos, Orfeo. Creative Reconstructions: Multilateralism and European Varieties of Capitalism After 1950. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.
Gonzalez, George A. Energy and the Politics of the North Atlantic. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2013.
Greven, David. Gender and Sexuality in Star Trek: Allegories of Desire in the Television Series and Films. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland, 2009.
Herf, Jeffrey. The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and The Holocaust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.
Jeffers, Thomas L. Norman Podhoretz: A Biography. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Jones, Daniel Stedman. Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.
Hark, Ina Rae. “Star Trek and Television’s Moral Universe.” Extrapolation 20, no. 1 (Spring 1979): 20–37.
Harrison, Taylor, Sarah Projansky, Kent Ono, and Elyce Rae Helford, eds. Enterprise Zones: Critical Positions on Star Trek. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1996.
Hunt, Michael H. The American Ascendancy: How the United States Gained and Wielded Global Dominance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.
Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996 [2011].
Klein, Gérard Klein. “From the Images of Science to Science Fiction.” In Learning from Other Worlds, ed. Patrick Parrinder, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.
Klotzko, Arlene Judith. A Clone of Your Own? New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Krugman, Paul. “Fearing Fear Itself.” New York Times, October 29, 2007, A19.
Levick, Stephen E. Clone Being: Exploring the Psychological and Social Dimensions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.
McCain, John. “Obama Made America Look Weak.” New York Times, March 15, 2014, A21.
Nimoy, Leonard. I Am Spock. New York: Hyperion, 1995.
Parent, Joseph M. Uniting States: Voluntary Union in World Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Parr, Adrian. The Wrath of Capital: Neoliberalism and Climate Change Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
Podhoretz, Norman. Present Danger. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1980.
Podhoretz, Norman. World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism. New York: Doubleday, 2007.
Richards, Thomas. The Meaning of Star Trek. New York: Doubleday, 1997.
Roberts, Robin. Sexual Generations: “Star Trek: The Next Generation” and Gender. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1999.
Rohde, David. “The World: Managing Freedom in Iraq; America Brings Democracy: Censor Now, Vote Later.” New York Times, June 22, 2003, Web.
Rosato, Sebastian. Europe United: Power Politics and the Making of the European Community. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.
Rosenboim, Or. The Emergence of Globalism: Visions of World Order in Britain and the United States, 1939–1950. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
Safire, William. “Islamofascism.” New York Times, October 1, 2006, Sec. 6, p. 20.
Sarantakes, Nicolas Evan. “Cold War Pop Culture and the Image of U.S. Foreign Policy: The Perspective of the Original Star Trek Series.” Journal of Cold War Studies 7, no. 4 (2005): 74–103.
Schmitt, Carl. The Concept of the Political, expanded ed. Chicago: University of Chicago University, 2007 [1929].
Shapiro, Alan N. Star Trek: Technologies of Disappearance. Berlin: Avinus Press, 2004.
Shear, Michael D. “Trump Imposes New Travel Ban on 7 Countries.” New York Times, September 25, 2017, A1.
Taub, Amanda, and Max Fisher. “With Red and Blue Already Clashing, Russia Was Happy to Antagonize.” New York Times, February 19, 2018, A12.
Thompson, C. Bradley, and Yaron Brook. Neoconservatism: An Obituary for an Idea. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2010.
Vaïsse, Justin. Neoconservatism: The Biography of a Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
Wagner, Jon, and Jan Lundeen. Deep Space and Sacred Time: Star Trek in the American Mythos. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.
Wilson, James Graham. The Triumph of Improvisation: Gorbachev’s Adaptability, Reagan’s Engagement, and the End of the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.
Wines, Michael. “Reagan Birthday Is a Gift to His Party.” New York Times, February 4, 1994, Web.
Wines, Michael. “States Say U.S. Must Do More To Protect Vote.” New York Times, February 20, 2018, A1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gonzalez, G.A. (2018). Globalism in Star Trek. In: Star Trek and the Politics of Globalism. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95411-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95411-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95410-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95411-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)