Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Dynamic Programming Method to Design for Optimal Performance of Grinding Cycles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

The design of an optimal grinding cycle that provides execution of all requirements of a drawing in terms of precision and quality in the shortest possible time is a complicated scientific and technical task that could be solved with a dynamic programming method (DPM) that is considered to be a method of optimal control theory. This article discusses the main aspects of DPM application for the optimization of short grinding cycles. The application of this method is stipulated with the fact that there is no need to limit a tolerance zone and this method is not sensitive to properties of control model and restrictions. The result is an ability to apply restrictions of precision (accuracy) not only to diametrical errors (inaccuracy) but also to form the deviation of surfaces. The purpose of operations efficiency increase defines the criteria of objective function to provide the shortest possible time of treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oliveira JFG, Silva EJ, Guo C, Hashimoto F (2009) Industrial challenges in grinding. Ann CIRP 58:663–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rowe WB (2013) Principles of modern grinding technology. Elsevier, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krajinik P, Drazumeric R, Badger J, Hashimito F (2014) Cycle optimization in cam-lobe grinding for high productivity. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 630:333–336

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nathan RD, Vijayaraghavan L, Krishnamurthy R (2001) Intelligent estimation of burning limits to aid in cylindrical grinding cycle planning. Heavy Veh Syst 8:48–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pi VN, Hung LX, Tung LA, Long BT (2016) Cost optimization of internal grinding. J Mater Sci Eng 6:291–296. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6221/2016.11-12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li GF, Wang LS, Yang LB (2002) Multi-parameter optimization and control of the cylindrical grinding process. J Mater Process Technol 129:232–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta R, Shishodia KS, Sekhon GS (2001) Optimization of grinding process parameters using enumeration method. J Mater Process Technol 112:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pi VN, The PQ, Khiem VH, Huong NN (2013) Cost optimization of external cylindrical grinding. Appl Mech Mater 312:982–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Warnecke G, Barth C (1999) Optimization of the dynamic behavior of grinding wheels for grinding of hard and brittle materials using the finite element method. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 48:261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Krishna AG, Rao KM (2006) Multi-objective optimisation of surface grinding operations using scatter search approach. J Adv Manuf Technol 29:475–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Inasaki I (1991) Monitoring and optimization of internal grinding process. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 400:359–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CW (2009) Dynamic optimization of the grinding process in batch production. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 131:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao G, Malkin S (1996) On-line optimization for internal plunge grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 45:287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mikhelkevich VN (1975) Automatic control of grinding. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bellman R (1960) Dynamic programming. Foreign Literature Publishing House, Moscow

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pereverzev PP, Akintseva AV (2016) Mathematical model for the internal grinding process of a non-circular hole machining. Procedia Eng 150:118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akintseva AV, Pereverzev PP (2017) Modeling the influence of the circle overtravel on the stability of internal grinding process. Procedia Eng 206:1184–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pereverzev PP, Akintseva AV (2016) Model of formation of processing errors intragrinding. Russ Eng Res 36(12):1048–1053. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068798X16120133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pereverzev PP, Akintseva AV (2015) Automatic cycles’ multiparametric optimization of internal grinding. Procedia Eng 129:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akintseva AV, Pereverzev PP (129) Complex optimization of parameters for controlling the cycle of internal grinding by the method of dynamic programming. MATEC Web Conf 129:01019

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South Ural State University, 76, Lenin Avenue, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia

    P. P. Pereverzev, A. V. Akintseva & M. K. Alsigar

Authors
  1. P. P. Pereverzev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Akintseva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. K. Alsigar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. P. Pereverzev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    Andrey A. Radionov

  2. Platov South-Russian State Polytechnic University, Novocherkassk, Russia

    Oleg A. Kravchenko

  3. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    Victor I. Guzeev

  4. South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

    Yurij V. Rozhdestvenskiy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pereverzev, P.P., Akintseva, A.V., Alsigar, M.K. (2019). Use of Dynamic Programming Method to Design for Optimal Performance of Grinding Cycles. In: Radionov, A., Kravchenko, O., Guzeev, V., Rozhdestvenskiy, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Industrial Engineering. ICIE 2018. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_183

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95630-5_183

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95629-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95630-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation