Skip to main content

The Gendered Dynamics of the Recruitment of Screenwriters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender Inequality in Screenwriting Work
  • 708 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a unique inside view of the informal and socialized recruitment processes of the UK film labour market and demonstrates the precise mechanisms that lead to gender inequality. The need to be constantly ‘networking’ is an accepted part of film work, but how exactly does it disadvantage women? This chapter also examines the way employers justify their subjective decisions about hiring certain personnel as risk reduction strategies, thereby excusing any need to address inequality of access to screenwriting work. In analysing the importance of the idea of ‘trust’ to employers of screenwriters, it also demonstrates how their talk suggests they are actually more likely to rely on homophily to feel secure about their choices and how this has a significant impact on women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Less than 10 per cent of all jobs advertised with flexible working conditions pay over £20,000 full-time equivalent. The best paid part-time jobs are negotiated by individuals in full-time positions (Timewise 2017: Key conclusions).

  2. 2.

    Working Title is the company behind such successful films as ‘Les Miserables’, ‘Notting Hill’, ‘Four Weddings and a Funeral’, and ‘Frost v Nixon’. See http://www.imdb.com/company/co0057311/ for a full list of their credits.

References

  • Banks, Mark. 2007. The politics of cultural work. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, Denise D. 2009. Gender inequality in culture industries: Women and men writers in film and television. Sociologie du travail 51 (2): 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, William T., and James N. Baron. 1984. A woman’s place is with other women: Sex segregation within organizations. In Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies, ed. Barbara F. Reskin, 27–55. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, Denise D., and William T. Bielby. 1996. Women and men in film: Gender inequality among writers in a culture industry. Gender & Society 10 (3): 248–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, William T., and Denise D. Bielby. 1999. Organizational mediation of project-based labor markets: Talent agencies and the careers of screenwriters. American Sociological Review 64: 64–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Helen. 2000. Active networking: The role of networks and hierarchy in the operation of the labour market in the British film industry. Management Research News 23: 20–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. ‘You’re only as good as your last job’: The labour process and labour market in the British film industry. Work, Employment and Society 15 (1): 149–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Active networking: Action, social structure and the process of networking. In Creative labour: Working in the creative industries, ed. Alan McKinley and Chris Smith, 116–134. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Helen, Susan Grey, and Keith Randle. 2001. Working in film–employment in a project based industry. Personnel Review 30 (2): 170–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1994. Structural contexts of opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc Wacquant. 1992. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. 2002. The social capital of structural holes. In The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field, ed. Mauro F. Guillén, Randall Collins, Paula England, and Marshall Meyer eds, 148–190. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Karen E. 1988. Gender differences in job-related networks. Work and Occupations 15 (2): 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, Susan. 2009. Working in the creative economy: Risk, adaptation, and the persistence of exclusionary networks. In Creative labour: Working in the creative industries, ed. Alan McKinlay and Chris Smith, 72–90. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, Shelley, Linda Ruth Williams and Natalie Wreyford. 2016. Calling the Shots: Women working in key roles on UK films in production during 2015. https://www.southampton.ac.uk/cswf/project/number_tracking.page. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.

  • Creative Skillset. 2010. Women in the creative media industries. http://www.ewawomen.com/uploads/files/surveyskillset.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.

  • Cromie, Stan, and Sue Birley. 1992. Networking by female business owners in Northern Ireland. Journal of Business Venturing 7 (3): 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Lily. 2015. Your Rolodex matters, but by how much depends on your gender. Knowledge Instead. https://knowledge.insead.edu/career/your-rolodex-matters-but-by-how-much-depends-on-your-gender-3862. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.

  • Faulkner, Robert R., and Andy B. Anderson. 1987. Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology 92 (4): 879–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Suzanne. 1999. Having none of it: Women, men and the future of work. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Rosalind. 2002. Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe. Information, Communication & Society 5 (1): 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Unspeakable inequalities: Post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity, and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 21 (4): 509–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Rosalind, and Andy Pratt. 2008. In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society 25 (7–8): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, Claudia, and Cecilia Rouse. 2000. Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economic Review 90 (4): 715–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, William. 1983. Adventures in the screen trade. New York: Grand Central Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark. 1995. Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grugulis, Irena, and Dimitrinka Stoyanova. 2012. Social capital and networks in film and TV: Jobs for the boys? Organization Studies 33 (10): 1311–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, David. 2007. The cultural industries. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie, and Anne Machung. 1989. The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, Herminia. 1992. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 422–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review 18 (1): 56–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Candace. 1996. Careers in project networks: The case of the film industry. In The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era, ed. Michael B. Arthur and Denise M. Rousseau, 58–75. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, Alexis, and Stephen Follows. 2018. Gender inequality and screenwriters. A study of the impact of gender on equality of opportunity for screenwriters and key creatives in the UK film and television industries. The Writers Guild of Great Britain. https://writersguild.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Gender-Inequality-and-Screenwriters.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2018.

  • Macdonald, Ian W. 2010. So it’s not surprising I’m neurotic the screenwriter and the screen idea work group. Journal of Screenwriting 1 (1): 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, Gail M. 2000. Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees’ network members. Work and Occupations 27 (4): 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Gender, race, and the shadow structure: A study of informal networks and inequality in a work organization. Gender & Society 16 (3): 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, Alan, and Chris Smith, eds. 2009. Creative labour: Working in the creative industries. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randle, Keith, and Nigel Culkin. 2009. Getting in and getting on in Hollywood: freelance careers in an uncertain industry. In Creative Labour, ed. Alan McKinlay, 93–115. London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Albert. 1966. Information networks in labor markets. The American Economic Review 56 (1/2): 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, Linda A., Howard Aldrich, and James Moody. 2000. Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces 79 (2): 523–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, Lauren A. 2011. Ivies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employers’ use of educational credentials. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 29 (1): 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Susan. 2007. British Films: who writes British films and how they are recruited. UK Film Council. http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/uk-film-council-writing-british-films-who-writes-british-films-and-how-they-are-recruited.pdf. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.

  • Singh, Anita. 2014. BBC staff take ‘unconscious bias’ course to encourage more diverse recruitment. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10794205/BBC-staff-take-unconscious-bias-course-to-encourage-more-diverse-recruitment.html. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.

  • Steele, David. 2013. Succes de plume? Female Screenwriters and Directors of UK Films, 2010–2012. http://www.bfi.org.uk/sites/bfi.org.uk/files/downloads/bfi-report-on-female-writers-and-directors-of-uk-films-2013-11.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2018.

  • Timewise. 2017. Timewise Flexible Jobs Index 2017. https://timewise.co.uk/what-we-do/research/flexible-jobs-index-2017/. Accessed 14 Apr 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wreyford, N. (2018). The Gendered Dynamics of the Recruitment of Screenwriters. In: Gender Inequality in Screenwriting Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95732-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics