Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 205 Accesses

Abstract

Three principal goals of these thesis are: (1) to systematically study the mechanisms of breakup in reactions of \(^{7}\mathrm{Li}\) and \(^{9}\mathrm{Be}\) with target nuclei from d to \(^{209}\mathrm{Bi}\), (2) to measure breakup probabilities in order to estimate the contribution of breakup to above-barrier complete fusion suppressions and (3) to examine the feasibility of applying the experimental and analysis techniques used for the study of breakup to the astrophysically relevant reaction \(^{7}\mathrm{Be}\)(d,p) \(^{8}\mathrm{Be}\). The unifying theme of these goals is the need to detect charged particles in coincidence with high efficiency. These measurements were performed with the ANU Breakup Array for Light Nuclei (BALiN), an array of four double-sided silicon strip detectors. In this chapter, the details of the measurement apparatus and techniques will be described, with a focus on the advances made to allow measurements with light to medium mass targets. The target nuclei studied in this work can be broadly categorised into \(\text {``heavy mass''}\) (\(^{144}\mathrm{Sm}\), \(^{168}\mathrm{Er}\), \(^{186}\mathrm{W}\), \(^{196}\mathrm{Pt}\), \(^{208}\mathrm{Pb}\) and \(^{209}\mathrm{Bi}\)), \(\text {``medium mass''}\) (\(^{58}\mathrm{Ni}\), \(^{27}\mathrm{Al}\) and \(^{28}\mathrm{Si}\)) and \(\text {``light mass''}\) ((C\(_2\)D\(_4\))\(^n\), \(^{12}\mathrm{C}\) and \(^{16}\mathrm{O}\)). It will be shown that the different masses result in different characteristic energy and angular distributions. This results in different experimental requirements that will be discussed here. All measurements in this thesis were made at the Australian National University Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility (HIAF).

Data! Data! Data! I can’t make bricks without clay!

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 1859 – 1930

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is the lowest terminal potential ever to be used at the 14UD to deliver beam, to the extent of the author’s knowledge.

  2. 2.

    Design MMM, Manufactured by Micron Semiconductor Limited, Sussex, UK.

  3. 3.

    Model MPR-16, mesytec GmbH & Co. KG, Putzbrunn, Germany.

  4. 4.

    Mesytec GmbH & Co. KG, Putzbrunn, Germany.

  5. 5.

    Differential version. mesytec GmbH & Co. KG, Putzbrunn, Germany.

  6. 6.

    CEAN S.p.A, Viareggio, Italy.

  7. 7.

    CEAN S.p.A, Viareggio, Italy.

  8. 8.

    Using an ORTEC 710 quad 1-kV bias supply, Advanced Measurement Technology Inc., Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

  9. 9.

    777 octal variable gain amplifier, Phillips Scientific, Mahwah, New Jersy, USA.

  10. 10.

    Phillips Scientific, Mahwah, New Jersy, USA.

  11. 11.

    Advanced Measurement Technology Inc., Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.

  12. 12.

    LeCroy Corporation, Chestnut Ridge, New York, USA.

  13. 13.

    Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation, San Rafael California, USA.

  14. 14.

    The case for the LIBEX, BELICK and LIAL runs.

  15. 15.

    As in the RDUX run.

  16. 16.

    Indeed, the difference in pulse shape between different particles in DSSDs has been exploited in direct particle identification via “pulse shape analysis” (e.g. [13]).

  17. 17.

    Events in adjacent sectors but in the same arc are suppressed in measurements with a hardware multiplicity two requirement, as coincidence events falling in one arc will only produce a multiplicity one signal.

  18. 18.

    For reasons that are not entirely clear, neither the LIAL nor LIBEX runs show any TDC deadtime associated with valid coincidence events. This is perhaps due to the fact that in these runs, ToFs were collected by taking the RF differences online, while in the RDUX runs, the difference was taken offline, though the mechanism for this is unclear.

References

  1. Spear, R.H., Kean, D.C., Esat, M.T., Joye, A.M.R., Fewell, M.P.: Energy calibration of the A.N.U. 14UD Pelletron accelerator. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 147(3), 455 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Knoll, G.F.: Radiation Detection and Measurement, 4th edn. Wiley, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krane, K.S.: Introductory Nuclear Physics. Wiley, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rafiei, R., du Rietz, R., Luong, D.H., Hinde, D.J., Dasgupta, M., Evers, M., Diaz-torres, A.: Mechanisms and systematics of breakup in reactions of \(^{9}\)Be at near-barrier energies. Phys. Rev. C 81(2), 024601 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rafiei, R.: Dynamics of breakup and quasifission - mechanisms inhibiting fusion. Ph.D. thesis, The Australian National University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Luong, D.H.: Mechanisms and time-scales in breakup of \(^{6,7}\)Li. Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luong, D.H., Dasgupta, M., Hinde, D.J., Du Rietz, R., Rafiei, R., Lin, C.J., Evers, M., Diaz-torres, A.: Insights into the mechanisms and time-scales of breakup of \(^{6,7}\)Li. Phys. Lett. B 695, 105 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luong, D.H., Dasgupta, M., Hinde, D.J., du Rietz, R., Rafiei, R., Lin, C.J., Evers, M., Diaz-Torres, A.: Predominance of transfer in triggering breakup in sub-barrier reactions of \(^{6,7}\)Li. Phys. Rev. C 88(3), 34609 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Simpson, E.C., Cook, K.J., Luong, D.H., Kalkal, S., Carter, I.P., Dasgupta, M., Hinde, D.J., Williams, E.: Disintegration locations in \(^7\)Li\(\rightarrow ^8\)Be transfer-triggered breakup at near-barrier energies. Phys. Rev. C 93(2), 024605 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brun, R., Rademakers, F.: ROOT - an object oriented data analysis framework. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 389, 81 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook, K.J., Simpson, E.C., Luong, D.H., Kalkal, S., Dasgupta, M., Hinde, D.J.: Importance of lifetime effects in breakup and suppression of complete fusion in reactions of weakly bound nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 93, 064604 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P., Littmark, U.: The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids. Pergamon, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. von Schmid, M., Egelhof, P., Eremin, V., Gernhuser, R., Krll, T., Mutterer, M., Pietralla, N., Streicher, B., Weber, M.: First application of pulse-shape analysis to silicon micro-strip detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 629(1), 197 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaitlin Jennifer Cook .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cook, K.J. (2018). Experimental Methods. In: Zeptosecond Dynamics of Transfer‐Triggered Breakup. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96017-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics