Abstract
The Center for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University was established to develop and apply social science insights to help society make informed decisions that will stabilize the earth’s life-sustaining climate, and prevent further harm from climate change. In this chapter, we describe our program of research and outreach efforts, focusing on the cognitive and affective drivers of climate change issue engagement, the roles of mediated and interpersonal communication in shaping climate change beliefs, attitudes, and actions, and the applications of audience segmentation in developing outreach programs. We also describe the theoretical foundations of our work, and our three major outreach programs: Climate Matters, an innovative collaboration of climate scientists, meteorologists, and social scientists to foster climate change communication among television weathercasters; the Medical Society Consortium on Climate & Health, an outgrowth of our research that identified a widespread lack of understanding that climate change affects human health; and RepublicEn, an initiative led by conservatives to catalyze a new narrative on climate change among conservatives, based in free-market thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
They differ from Social-Cognitive Theory in the emphasis some place on emotions—specifically, fear—as drivers of behavior.
- 2.
While the climate science community prefers the term “climate change,” we continue using “global warming” in our surveys because it is still the most commonly used term among Americans (Leiserowitz, Feinberg, et al., 2014).
- 3.
In November, 2009, over 1000 stolen emails between climate scientists were publically released, along with claims that they were evidence of scientific misconduct to mislead the public about climate change. Dubbed “Climategate,” the event drew widespread media attention. Multiple university investigations showed the charges against the scientists to be unfounded, and cleared them of all charges.
- 4.
Humans are capable of reducing climate change because humans are causing it; hence, human causation is a logical foundation for efficacy.
- 5.
The 2017 hurricane season may change this. At this writing, however, it is too early to say.
- 6.
Figure 6.8 shows only a small piece of the model-testing. The analysis assessed six different models, including models with both synchronous and lagged effects of belief certainty and personal experience at T1 and T2, as well as all relevant controls, for both the highly and less engaged groups. Only two variables are shown here for simplicity. See the full paper for complete results.
- 7.
Twenty-one percent of Americans are Catholic, second only to Evangelical Protestants, who make up a quarter of the population (Pew Research Center, 2013).
- 8.
This is a misperception. Boycotts that receive at least some national media attention have about a one-in-four success rate in influencing corporate practices (Friedman, 1985; King, 2008; Roser-Renouf, Atkinson, Maibach & Leiserowitzl, 2016); and for those that include public protests or demonstrations, the success rate jumps to about half (Friedman, 1985).
- 9.
The full segmentation screener with all 36 items, a 15-item abbreviated screening instrument, and the methodology used in the segmentation can be found in Maibach et al. (2011).
- 10.
This pattern does not describe affective involvement, as reflected in worry, concern, or personal importance. These characteristics follow the same pattern as attitudinal valence.
- 11.
This is readily apparent in the comments sections accompanying online news reports about climate change, which typically contain large numbers of comments disputing climate science.
- 12.
- 13.
The authors note that although weather did not affect opinions during the years they analyzed, it could in the future.
- 14.
Over the past 7 years, we have made consistent efforts to educate members of this community about climate change, primarily through presentations and workshops at their annual professional meetings. In our 2017 survey of weathercasters, we found that 95% now say climate change is happening, an increase of 41 percentage points. Understanding of human causation has also changed, though less dramatically: 49% now say it is mostly or entirely human-caused, an increase of 18 percentage points, and another 21% say it is equally caused by human activity and natural events (Maibach et al., 2017).
References
Balbus, J., Ebi, K., Finzer, L., Malina, C., Chadwick, A., McBride, D., … Maibach, E. (2008). Are we ready? Preparing for the public health challenges of climate change. Retrieved from National Association of County and City Health Officials website: http://www.naccho.org/uploads/downloadable-resources/Are-we-ready_14_view.pdf
Ball-Rokeach, S. J., & DeFleur, M. L. (1976). A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research, 3, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027600300101
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
Bloodhart, B., Maibach, E., Myers, T., & Zhao, X. (2015). Local climate experts: The influence of local TV weather information on climate change perceptions. PLoS One, 10, e0141526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141526
Boucher, J. L. (2016). Culture, carbon, and climate change: A class analysis of climate change belief, lifestyle lock-in, and personal carbon footprint. Social Ecology: Journal for Environmental Thought and Sociological Research, 25, 53–80. https://doi.org/10.17234/SocEkol.25.1.3
Bowers, A. W., Monroe, M. C., & Adams, D. C. (2016). Climate change communication insights from cooperative extension professionals in the US southern states: Finding common ground. Environmental Communication, 10, 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1176947
Boykoff, M. T. (2007). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39, 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00769.x
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., & Jenkins, J. C. (2012). Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change, 114(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y
Burstein, P., Einwohner, R., & Hollander, J. (1995). The success of political movements: A bargaining perspective. In J. Jenkins & B. Klandermans (Eds.), Politics of social protest: Comparative perspectives on states and social movements (pp. 275–295). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037963
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2016). Climate effects on health. Retrieved from CDC website: https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/effects/
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Social contagion theory: Examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5408
Chryst, B., Marlon, J., van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (in press). Six Americas short survey. Environmental Communication.
Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., … Nuccitelli, D. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Davenport, C. (2013, July 25). Why it finally makes sense to talk about climate change. National Journal.
Detenber, B., Rosenthal, S., Liao, Y., & Ho, S. S. (2016). Audience segmentation for campaign design: Addressing climate change in Singapore. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4736–4758 Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41984
Ding, D., Maibach, E., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1, 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1295
Doherty, K. L., & Webler, T. N. (2016). Social norms and efficacy beliefs drive the alarmed segment’s public-sphere climate actions. Nature Climate Change, 6, 879–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3025
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 144–160). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612449177
Feldman, L. M., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. International Journal of Press/Politics, 17, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211425410
Feldman, L. M., Myers, T. A., Hmielowski, J. D., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2014). The mutual reinforcement of media selectivity and effects: Testing the reinforcing spirals framework in the context of global warming. Journal of Communication, 64, 590–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12108
Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351435
Figueres, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Whiteman, G., Rockström, J., Hobley, A., & Rahmstorf, S. (2017). Three years to safeguard our climate. Nature, 546, 593–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/546593a
Flora, J., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2014). Climate change activism and youth. In UNICEF (Ed.), The challenges of climate change: Children on the front line (pp. 86–91). Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/34335801/Challenges_of_Climate_Change-Children_on_the_Front_Line.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1506619508&Signature=ntciaZCcEDuQVqs0z1mIVhC0YaA%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DInequality_climate_change_and_children_s.pdf
Flora, J. A., Saphir, M., Lappé, M., Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2014). Evaluation of a national high school entertainment education program: The Alliance for Climate Education. Climatic Change, 127, 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1274-1
Friedman, M. (1985). Consumer boycotts in the United States, 1970–1980: Contemporary events in historical perspective. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 19, 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1985.tb00346.x
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916595275005
Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L. M., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A. A. & Maibach, E.W. (2013). An attack on science?: Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 866–883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513480091
Hornik, R. (2002). Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Howe, P. D., Boudet, H., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2014). Mapping the shadow of experience of extreme weather events. Climatic Change, 127, 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1253-6
Howe, P. D., Mildenberger, M., Marlon, J. R., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 596. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2583
Howe, P. D., Thaker, J., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). Perceptions of changes in rainfall and extreme events among the Indian public. Climatic Change, 127, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1245-6
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266687
Kelly, L. A. D., Luebke, J. F., Clayton, S., Saunders, C. D., Matiasek, J., & Grajal, A. (2014). Climate change attitudes of zoo and aquarium visitors: Implications for climate literacy education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62, 502–510. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-078.1
King, B. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 395–421. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.3.395
Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., & Visser, P. S. (2000). The impact of the fall 1997 debate about global warming on American public opinion. Public Understanding of Science, 9, 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/303
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., Smith, N., Anderson A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Maibach, E. (2014, May). What’s in a name? Global warming vs. climate change. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/?s=+Global+Warming+vs.+Climate+Change
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2013, April). Extreme weather and climate change in the American mind, April 2013. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/?s=Extreme+Weather+and+Climate+Change+in+the+American+Mind%2C+April+2013
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2015a, October). Climate change in the American mind: October, 2015. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/?s=Climate+change+in+the+American+mind%3A+October%2C+2015
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2015b, March). Climate change in the American Christian mind: March, 2015. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/?s=Climate+change+in+the+American+Christian+mind%3A+March%2C+2015
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., & Marlon, J. (2014, October). Public perceptions of the health consequences of global warming: October, 2014. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/?s=Public+Perceptions+of+the+Health+Consequences+of+Global+Warming
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Rosenthal, S., & Cutler, M. (2017). Climate change in the American mind: May 2017. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/may2017ccam/
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Smith, N. (2011, May). Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in May 2011. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/the-climate-change-in-the-american-mind-series-may-2011-2/
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N., & Dawson, Y. E. (2012). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 818–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212458272
Leiserowitz, A., & Smith, N. (2011). Knowledge of climate change among visitors to Science & Technology Museums. Retrieved from Yale Program on Climate Change Communication website: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/MuseumReport.pdf
Leiserowitz, A., Thaker, J., Feinberg, G., & Cooper, D. (2013) Global warming’s six Indias. Yale University. Retrieved from Yale Program on Climate Change Communication website: http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2013_05_Global-Warming%E2%80%99s-Six-Indias.pdf
Luber, G., Knowlton, K., Balbus, J., Frumkin, H., Hayden, M., Hess, J., & Ziska, L. (2014). Human health. Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. In J. M. Melillo, Terese (T. C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe (Eds.), Third national climate assessment (pp. 220–256). https://doi.org/10.7930/J0PN93H5. Retrieved from http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/sectors/human-health
Maibach, E. (in press). Increasing public awareness and facilitating behavior change: Two guiding heuristics. In L. Hannah & T. Lovejoy (Eds.), Climate change and biodiversity (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Maibach, E., Cullen, H., Placky, B., Witte, J., Seitter, K., Gardiner, N., … Sublette, S. (2016). TV meteorologists as local climate educators. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.505
Maibach, E., Kreslake, J., Roser-Renouf, C., Rosenthal, S., Feinberg, G., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Do Americans understand that global warming is harmful to human health? Evidence from a national survey. Annals of Global Health, 81, 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.08.010
Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS One, 6, e17571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., Myers, T., Rosenthal, S., & Feinberg, G. (2015). The Francis effect: How Pope Francis changed the conversation about global warming. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/?s=The+Francis+Effect%3A+How+Pope+Francis+Changed+the+Conversation+about+Global+Warming
Maibach, E., Perkins, D., Timm, K., Myers, T., Placky, B., Sublette, S., … Seitter, K. (2017). A 2017 national survey of broadcast meteorologists: Initial findings. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/tag/2017+tv-weathercasters/
Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K., Leiserowitz, A., & Nisbet, M. (2010). Saving energy is a value shared by all Americans: Results of a global warming audience segmentation analysis. In K. Erhardt-Martinez & J. Laitner (Eds.), People-centered initiatives for increasing energy savings (pp. 99–112). Retrieved from http://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/publications/ebook/eb01.pdf
Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2008). Communication and marketing as climate change intervention assets: A public health perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.016
Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2009). Global Warming’s Six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/climate-change-in-the-american-mind-global-warmings-six-americas/
Maibach, E., Wilson, K., & Witte, J. (2010a). A national survey of news directors about climate change: Preliminary findings. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/?s=A+National+Survey+of+News+Directors+about+Climate+Change
Maibach, E., Wilson, K., & Witte, J. (2010b). A national survey of television meteorologists about climate change: Preliminary findings. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Center for Climate Change Communication Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/tag/2010+tv-weathercasters/
Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x
Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health. (2017). Medical alert! Climate change is harming our health. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/medical-alert-climate-change-is-harming-our-health/
Metag, J., Füchslin, T., & Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Understanding of Science, 26, 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515592558
Morrison, M., Duncan, R., Sherley, C., & Parton, K. (2013). A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Australia and the United States. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 20, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2012.762946
Myers, T., Rolfe-Redding, J., Roser-Renouf, C., & Maibach, E. (2014). Visitors’ experiences with NASA’s earth observatory and global climate change resources. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Center for Climate Change Communication.
Myers, T. A., Maibach, E., Peters, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: The results of two experiments. PLoS One, 10, e0120985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120985
Myers, T. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Akerlof, K., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2013). The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change, 3, 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1754
Myers, T. A., Nisbet, M. C., Maibach, E. W., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change: A letter. Climatic Change, 13, 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6
Myers, T. A., Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2017). Exposure to the Pope’s climate change message activated convinced Americans to take certain activism actions. Global Challenges, 1, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600019
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316691
Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Science Communication, 30, 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328969
Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306(5702), 1686–1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
Pew Research Center. (2013). Question search. Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/question-search/?qid=408&cntIDs=&stdIDs=
Pew Research Center. (2015). How do Americans stand out from the rest of the world? Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/03/12/how-do-americans-stand-out-from-the-rest-of-the-world/
Phipps, M. (2011). Global Warming’s Six Americas: A science museum of Minnesota audience segmentation analysis. Retrieved from http://www.informalscience.org/sites/default/files/6Americas_with2011data.pdf
Politico Magazine. (2016). Politico 50: Our guide to the thinkers, doers and visionaries transforming American politics in 2016. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/magazine/politico50/2016
Ranney, M. A., & Clark, D. (2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12187
RepublicEn. (2017). RepublicEn: Engaging conservatives. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/republicen/
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Roser-Renouf, C., Atkinson, L., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2016). The consumer as climate activist. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4759–4783 Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4702
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S (2016). Faith, morality and the environment: Portraits of Global Warming’s Six Americas. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/faith-morality-and-the-environment-2016/
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., & Kreslake, J. (2014). Global Warming’s Six Americas: Perceptions of the health consequences of global warming and update on key beliefs. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/global-warmings-six-americas-in-october-2014-perceptions-of-the-health-consequences-of-global-warming-and-update-on-key-beliefs-2/
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., & Rosenthal, S. (2016). Takin’ it to the mall: Consumer activism on global warming. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/takin-it-to-the-mall-consumer-activism-on-global-warming/
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., & Zhao, X. (2014). The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action. Climatic Change, 125, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1173-5
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E. W., & Li, J. (2016). Adapting to the changing climate: An assessment of local health department preparations for climate change-related health threats, 2008-2012. PLoS One, 11, e0151558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151558
Roser-Renouf, C., Stenhouse, N., Rolfe-Redding, J., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). Engaging diverse audiences with climate change: Message strategies for Global Warming’s Six Americas. In A. Hansen & R. Cox (Eds.), Handbook of environment and communication (pp. 368–386). New York, NY: Routledge.
Rowan, K., Kotcher, J., Walsh-Thomas, J., Baldwin, P., Trowbridge, J., Thaker, J., … Maibach, E. (in press). Best practices of “innovator” TV meteorologists who act as climate change educators. In D. O’Hair (Ed.), Risk and health communication in an evolving media environment. London, England: Routledge.
Sarfaty, M., Kreslake, J., Bloodhart, B., Price, K., Casale, T., Folstein, S., & Maibach, E. (2015). Views of allergy specialists on the health effects of climate change, key findings: Membership survey of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, Immunology, December 2015. Retrieved from George Mason Center for Climate Change Communication website: https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/all/views-of-allergy-specialists-on-the-health-effects-of-climate-change-2/
Sarfaty, M., Kreslake, J., Casale, T., & Maibach, E. (2015). Views of AAAAI members on climate change and health. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 4, 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2015.09.018
Sarfaty, M., Kreslake, J., Ewart, G., Guidotti, T., Thurston, G., Balmes, J., & Maibach, E. (2016). Views of American Thoracic Society international members on climate change and health. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 13, 1808–1813. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-229BC
Sarfaty, M., Mitchell, M., Bloodhart, B., & Maibach, E. (2014). A survey of African-American physicians on the health effects of climate change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 12473–12485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111212473
Schweizer, S., Davis, S., & Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: A theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7, 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2012.753634
Sciencetogo.org. (2017). About the project. Retrieved from the Sciencetogo.org website: http://sciencetogo.org/about/
Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1086/267513
Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
Somerville, R. C., & Hassol, S. J. (2011). The science of climate change. Physics Today, 64, 48. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1296?ver=pdfcov
Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
Tewksbury, D. (2005). The seeds of audience fragmentation: Specialization in the use of online news sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_5
Theel, S., Greenberg, M., & Robbins, D. (2013, October 10). Media sowed doubt in coverage of UN climate report. Retrieved from Media Matters for America website: https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2013/10/10/study-media-sowed-doubt-in-coverage-of-un-clima/196387
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2011). Construal level theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Krugalanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 118–134). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Valente, T. (2012). Network interventions. Science, 337, 49. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217330
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G., & Maibach, E. (2014). How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Climatic Change Letters, 126, 255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598516
van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS One, 10, e0118489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118489
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
Walsh, J., Wuebbles, D., Hayhoe, K., Kossin, J., Kunkel, K., Stephens, G., … Somerville, R. (2014). Our changing climate. In J. Melillo, T. Richmond, & G. Yohe (Eds.), Third national climate assessment (pp. 19–67). Retrieved from http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/report/our-changing-climate/introduction
Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3
Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 119, 41–60 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20025337
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
Zhao, X., Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2011). Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. Journal of Communication, 61, 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01563.x
Zhao, X., Maibach, E., Gandy, J., Witte, J., Cullen, H., Klinger, B., … Pyle, A. (2014). Climate change education through TV weathercasters: Results of a field experiment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 95, 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00144.1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E.W. (2018). Strategic Communication Research to Illuminate and Promote Public Engagement with Climate Change. In: Hope, D., Bevins, R. (eds) Change and Maintaining Change. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol 65. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96920-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96920-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96919-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96920-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)