Skip to main content
  • 448 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I revisit the research question. I discuss the empirical and theoretical approach of the book. I conclude that interest group activities can be classified into equivalence classes. The choice of strategies can be explained by the distance to the constraining political actor (private communication) or the expected policy outcome (public communication). These effects are still valid when controlling for group type, which has been one of the main explanatory factors for strategy choice. I demonstrate that it is necessary to think beyond group type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Lech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braumoeller, B. F. (2006). Explaining Variance; Or Stuck in a Moment We Can’t Get Out Of. Political Analysis, 14(1), 268–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic Information Transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esterling, K. M. (2004). The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, K. (1997). Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 519–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman, K. (1998). Outside Lobbying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potters, J., & van Winden, F. (1992). Lobbying and Asymmetric Information. Public Choice, 74(3), 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, D. B. (1971). The Governmental Process. Political Interests and Public Opinion (2nd ed.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Koehler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koehler, S. (2019). Conclusions. In: Lobbying, Political Uncertainty and Policy Outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97055-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics