Skip to main content

Human Security in Practice: The Case of South Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Security Norms in East Asia

Abstract

This chapter discusses the acceptance of human security by the “ODA community” in South Korea. The authors examine official documents, academic publications, and interviews with stakeholders, to see whether the term “human security” was explicitly or implicitly used. The result shows that even though the South Korean government does not use the term very often, it has embraced the three freedoms, protection, and empowerment in its official development assistance (ODA) policies. While it is not clear whether the idea of human security has been fully implemented in ODA activities, it is noteworthy that the term has been explicitly used by the South Korean government. The chapter concludes by mentioning the possible utility of the concept with regard to future situations around North Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    South Korea’s ODA does not include its assistance to North Korea, since South Korea’s constitution includes North Korea as part of a larger Korea, and not as a separate country. OECD/DAC defines ODA as international development cooperation between nation-states. Thus, South Korea’s assistance for North Korea cannot be counted toward its ODA. Hence this chapter does not deal with South Korea’s assistance to North Korean refugees or other types of humanitarian support for North Korea.

  2. 2.

    Implicit use refers to when the meaning of human security is embraced without explicit use of the term.

  3. 3.

    Political parties have changed their names, and a more progressive government has taken office in 2017. Please note that the party’s name and political position—incumbent versus opposition party—is based on the empirical research in 2014.

  4. 4.

    Eun Mee Kim, 2014, asked the Minister for clarification of his use of the term human security in his speech, and he confirmed his knowledge of the term and meaning.

  5. 5.

    President-elect Myung-bak Lee, 2014, telephone communication with the Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon of the UN.

  6. 6.

    Lee Myung-bak, 2008, Focus on Environment and Human Rights as Part of Human Security.

  7. 7.

    The Saenuri Party’s Supreme Council member Hee-tae Park, 2014, comments made at the luncheon with the ambassadors from combatant nations of the Korean War commemorating United Nations Day.

  8. 8.

    Although Moon lost the 2012 election, he was elected President in May 2017.

References

Interviews

  • Government Source #1. 2014. Expert Advisor from the Prime Minister’s Office. Interviewed by the author (mailed questionnaire), July 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Source #2. 2014. Deputy Director of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance (MOSF). Interviewed by the author (mailed questionnaire), July 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Academia Source #1. 2014. Professor at Ewha Womans University. Interviewed by the author in Seoul, July 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Academia Source #2. 2014. Professor at Kyung Hee University. Interviewed by the author in Seoul, July 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Civil Society Organization Source #1. 2014. Director of Advocacy team at World Vision Korea. Interviewed by the author in Seoul, July 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization Source #1. 2014. Head of the UNWFP Korea Office. Interviewed by the author in Seoul, July 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization Source #2. 2014. Head of IOM Korea. Interviewed by the author in Seoul, July 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eun Mee Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kim, E.M., Bae, S.Y., Shin, J.H. (2019). Human Security in Practice: The Case of South Korea. In: Mine, Y., Gómez, O.A., Muto, A. (eds) Human Security Norms in East Asia. Security, Development and Human Rights in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97247-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics