Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Overview of the Distributed Integrated Cognition Affect and Reflection DIARC Architecture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive Architectures

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering ((ISCA,volume 94))

Abstract

DIARC has been under development for over 15 years. Different from other cognitive architectures like SOAR or ACT-R, DIARC is an intrinsically component-based distributed architecture scheme that can be instantiated in many different ways. Moreover, DIARC has several distinguishing features, such as affect processing and deep natural language integration, is open-world and multi-agent enabled, and allows for “one-shot instruction-based learning” of new percepts, actions, concepts, rules, and norms. In this chapter, we will present an overview of the DIARC architecture and compare it to classical cognitive architectures. After laying out the theoretical foundations, we specifically focus on the action, vision, and natural language subsystems. We then give two examples of DIARC configurations for “one-shot learning” and “component-sharing”. We also briefly mention different use cases of DIARC, in particular, for autonomous robots in human-robot interaction experiments and for building cognitive models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A detailed conceptual and empirical comparison of robotic infrastructures up to 2006 can be found in [35].

  2. 2.

    The description of additional relevant components, such as the Belief and Inference subsystem, the (Motion and Task) Planning subsystem, and the interfaces with other middleware, will have to await a different publication outlet.

References

  1. Andronache, V., & Scheutz, M. (2004). ADE—A tool for the development of distributed architectures for virtual and robotic agents. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium “From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation” (pp. 606–611).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andronache, V., & Scheutz, M. (2004). Integrating theory and practice: The agent architecture framework APOC and its development environment ADE. In Proceedings of AAMAS 2004 (pp. 1014–1021). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andronache, V., & Scheutz, M. (2006). ADE–An architecture development environment for virtual and robotic agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools, 15(2), 251–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, M., Williams, T., Thames, D., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Differences in interaction patterns and perception for teleoperated and autonomous humanoid robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brick, T., Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2007). Speech and action: Integration of action and language for mobile robots. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 1423–1428). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brick, T., & Scheutz, M. (2007, March). Incremental natural language processing for HRI. In Proceedings of the Second ACM IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 263–270). Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Briggs, G., McConnell, I., & Scheutz, M. (2015). When robots object: Evidence for the utility of verbal, but not necessarily spoken protest. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Robotics.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2011, June). Facilitating mental modeling in collaborative human-robot interaction through adverbial cues. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference, Portland, Oregon (pp. 239–247).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2012). Investigating the effects of robotic displays of protest and distress. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Social Robotics. LNCS (pp. 238–247). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2012). Multi-modal belief updates in multi-robot human-robot dialogue interaction. In Proceedings of 2012 Symposium on Linguistic and Cognitive Approaches to Dialogue Agents.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2013). A hybrid architectural approach to understanding and appropriately generating indirect speech acts. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2014). How robots can affect human behavior: Investigating the effects of robotic displays of protest and distress. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2015). “Sorry, i can’t do that”: Developing mechanisms to appropriately reject directives in human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of the 2015 AAAI Fall Symposium on AI and HRI.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Briggs, G., Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Enabling robots to understand indirect speech acts in task-based interactions. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction (JHRI).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Briggs, P., Scheutz, M., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2014). Reactions of people with Parkinson’s disease to a robot interviewer. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Assistive Robotics for Individuals with Disabilities at IROS 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Briggs, P., Scheutz, M., & Tickle-Degnen, L. (2015). Are robots ready for administering health status surveys: First results from an HRI study with subjects with Parkinson’s disease. In Proceedings of 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cantrell, R., Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2011, July). Learning actions from human-robot dialogues. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cantrell, R., Talamadupula, K., Schermerhorn, P., Benton, J., Kambhampati, S., & Scheutz, M. (2012, March). Tell me when and why to do it!: Run-time planner model updates via natural language instruction. In Proceedings of the 2012 Human-Robot Interaction Conference, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chakraborti, T., Briggs, G., Talamadupula, K., Zhang, Y., Scheutz, M., Smith, D., et al. (2015). Planning for serendipity. In Proceedings of IROS.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Crowell, C., Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P., & Villano, M. (2009, October). Gendered voice and robot entities: Perceptions and reactions of male and female subjects. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dale, R., & Reiter, E. (1995). Computational interpretations of the gricean maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 19(2), 233–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dzifcak, J., Scheutz, M., Baral, C., & Schermerhorn, P. (2009, May). What to do and how to do it: Translating natural language directives into temporal and dynamic logic representation for goal management and action execution. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’09), Kobe, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eberhard, K., Nicholson, H., Kuebler, S., Gundersen, S., & Scheutz, M. (2010, May). The Indiana cooperative remote search task (CReST) corpus. In Proceedings of LREC 2010: Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Malta.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gervits, F., Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2017). The pragmatic parliament: A framework for socially-appropriate utterance selection in artificial agents. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Disfluent but effective? A quantitative study of disfluencies and conversational moves in team discourse. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Team communication as a collaborative process. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception (Vol. 39).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 274–307.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001, March). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 194–203.

    Google Scholar 

  30. JAUS. Jaus.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kramer, J., Scheutz, M., Brockman, J., & Kogge, P. (2006). Facing up to the inevitable: Intelligent error recovery in massively parallel processing in memory architectures. In H. R. Arabnia (Ed.), International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications, Las Vegas (pp. 227–233).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kramer, J., & Scheutz, M. (2006, October). ADE: A framework for robust complex robotic architectures. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Bejing, China (pp. 4576–4581).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kramer, J., & Scheutz, M. (2006). ADE: Filling a gap between single and multiple agent systems. In Proceedings of the ACE 2004 Symposium at the 18th European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kramer, J., & Scheutz, M. (2007, April). Reflection and reasoning mechanisms for failure detection and recovery in a distributed robotic architecture for complex robots. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy (pp. 3699–3704).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kramer, J., & Scheutz, M. (2007). Robotic development environments for autonomous mobile robots: A survey. Autonomous Robots, 22(2), 101–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kramer, J., Scheutz, M., & Schermerhorn, P. (2007, Oct/Nov). ‘talk to me!’: Enabling communication between robotic architectures and their implementing infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA (pp. 3044–3049).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Krause, E., Cantrell, R., Potapova, E., Zillich, M., & Scheutz, M. (2013). Incrementally biasing visual search using natural language input. In Proceedings of AAMAS (pp. 31–38).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Krause, E., Zillich, M., Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2014). Learning to recognize novel objects in one shot through human-robot interactions in natural language dialogues. In Proceedings of Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kuebler, S., Cantrell, R., & Scheutz, M. (2011). Actions speak louder than words: Evaluating parsers in the context of natural language understanding systems for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of RANLP (pp. 56–62).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Laird, J. E., Lebiere, C., & Rosenbloom, P. (2017). A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. AI Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Langley, P., Pat, J. E., & Rogers, S. (2009, June). Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Metta, G., Fitzpatrick, P., & Natale, L. (2006). Yarp: Yet another robot platform. International Journal on Advanced Robotics Systems, 3, 43–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nicholson, H., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2010). Um...i don’t see any: The function of filled pauses and repairs. In Proceedings of 5th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (pp. 89–92).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nunez, R. C., Dabarera, R., Scheutz, M., Briggs, G., Bueno, O., Premaratne, K., et al. (2013). DS-based uncertain implication rules for inference and fusion applications. In 16th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) (pp. 1934–1941).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Oosterveld, B., Brusatin. L., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Two bots, one brain: Component sharing in cognitive robotic architectures. In Proceedings of 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Video Contest.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B. P., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., et al. (2009). ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In Proceedings of ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rusu, R. B., & Cousins, S. (2011, May 9–13). 3D is here: Point cloud library (PCL). In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sadeghi, S., Scheutz, M., & Krause, E. (2017). An embodied incremental Bayesian model of cross-situational word learning. In proceedings of the 2017 Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sarathy, V., & Scheutz, M. (2016). A Logic-based computational framework for inferring cognitive affordances. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, PP(99), 1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sarathy, V., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Cognitive affordance representations in uncertain logic. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sarathy, V., & Scheutz, M. (2016). A logic-based computational framework for inferring cognitive affordances. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 8(3).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sarathy, V., Scheutz, M., Austerweil, J., Kenett, Y., Allaham, M., & Malle, B. (2017). Mental representations and computational modeling of context-specific human norm systems. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sarathy, V., Wilson, J., Arnold, T., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Enabling basic normative HRI in a cognitive robotic architecture. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Cognitive Architectures for Social Human-Robot Interaction at the 11th ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2008). Natural language interactions in distributed networks of smart devices. International Journal of Semantic Computing, 2(4), 503–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2009, November). Dynamic robot autonomy: Investigating the effects of robot decision-making in a human-robot team task. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2009, July). The utility of affect in the selection of actions and goals under real-world constraints. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2011, February). Disentangling the effects of robot affect, embodiment, and autonomy on human team members in a mixed-initiative task. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Gosier, Guadeloupe, France (pp. 236–241).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schermerhorn, P., Scheutz, M., & Crowell, C. R. (2008). Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? In Proceedings of the Third ACM IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 263–270). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Scheutz, M. (2006). ADE—Steps towards a distributed development and runtime environment for complex robotic agent architectures. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 20(4–5),

    Google Scholar 

  60. Scheutz, M., & Andronache, V. (2004). Architectural mechanisms for dynamic changes of behavior selection strategies in behavior-based systems. IEEE Transactions of System, Man, and Cybernetics Part B: Cybernetics, 34(6), 2377–2395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Scheutz, M., Briggs, G., Cantrell, R., Krause, E., Williams, T., & Veale, R. (2013). Novel mechanisms for natural human-robot interactions in the DIARC architecture. In Proceedings of AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Robotic Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Scheutz, M., Cantrell, R., & Schermerhorn, P. (2011). Toward humanlike task-based dialogue processing for human robot interaction. AI Magazine, 32(4), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Scheutz, M., Harris, J., & Schermerhorn, P. (2013). Systematic integration of cognitive and robotic architectures. In Advances in Cognitive Systems (pp. 277–296).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Scheutz, M., Krause, E., Oosterveld, B., Frasca, T., & Platt, R. (2017). Spoken instruction-based one-shot object and action learning in a cognitive robotic architecture. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Scheutz, M., Krause, E., & Sadeghi, S. (2014). An embodied real-time model of language-guided incremental visual search. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P., Kramer, J., & Anderson, D. (2007, May). First steps toward natural human-like HRI. Autonomous Robots, 22(4), 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Scheutz, M., Schermerhorn, P., Kramer, J., & Middendorff, C. (2006). The utility of affect expression in natural language interactions in joint human-robot tasks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 226–233).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language, vol. 626. Cambridge university press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. Syntax and Semantics, 3, 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sloman, A., & Scheutz, M. (2002). A framework for comparing agent architectures. In UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (pp. 169–176).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Strait, M., Briggs, P., & Scheutz, M. (2015). Gender, more so than age, modulates positive perceptions of language-based human-robot interaction. In 4th International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, AISB.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Strait, M., Canning, C., & Scheutz, M. (2014). Let me tell you! investigating the effects of robot communication strategies in advice-giving situations based on robot appearance, interaction modality, and distance. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 479–486).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Talamadupula, K., Briggs, G., Chakraborti, T., Scheutz, M., & Kambhampati, S. (2014). Coordination in human-robot teams using mental modeling and plan recognition. In Proceedings of IROS.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Talamadupula, K., Briggs, G., Scheutz, M., & Kambhampti, S. (2017). Architectural mechanisms for handling human instructions for open-world mixed-initiative team tasks and goals. In Advances in Cognitive System, vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Trafton, G., Hiatt, L., Harrison, A., Tamborello, F., Khemlani, S., & Schultz, A. (2013). ACT-R/E: An embodied cognitive architecture for human-robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 1(1), 78–95.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Veale, R., Briggs, G., & Scheutz, M. (2013). Linking cognitive tokens to biological signals: Dialogue. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Williams, T. (2017). A consultant framework for natural language processing in integrated robot architectures. IEEE Intelligent Informatics Bulletin (IIB), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Williams, T., Acharya, S., Schreitter, S., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Situated open world reference resolution for human-robot dialogue. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Williams, T., Briggs, G., Oosterveld, B., & Scheutz, M. (2015). Going beyond command-based instructions: Extending robotic natural language interaction capabilities. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Williams, T., Briggs, P., Pelz, N., & Scheutz, M. (2014). Is robot telepathy acceptable? Investigating effects of nonverbal robot-robot communication on human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of 23rd IEEE Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Williams, T., Briggs, P., & Scheutz, M. (2015). Covert robot-robot communication: Human perceptions and implications for human-robot interaction. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction (JHRI).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Williams, T., Cantrell, R., Briggs, G., Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2013). Grounding natural language references to unvisited and hypothetical locations. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Williams, T., Johnson, C., Scheutz, M., & Kuipers, B. (2017). A tale of two architectures: A dual-citizenship integration of natural language and the cognitive map. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Williams, T., Núñez, R. C., Briggs, G., Scheutz, M., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2014). A Dempster-Shafer theoretic approach to understanding indirect speech acts. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence—Proceedings of the 14th Ibero-American Conference on AI (IBERAMIA).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2015). A domain-independent model of open-world reference resolution. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (COGSCI).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2015). Power: A domain-independent algorithm for probabilistic, open-world entity resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2016). A framework for resolving open-world referential expressions in distributed heterogeneous knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Resolution of referential ambiguity using Dempster–Shafer theoretic pragmatics. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on AI for HRI (AI-HRI).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Referring expression generation under uncertainty: Algorithm and evaluation framework. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Natural Language Generation (INLG).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Referring expression generation under uncertainty in integrated robot architectures. In Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems Workshop on Human-Centered Robotics: Interaction, Physiological Integration and Autonomy.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Resolution of referential ambiguity in human-robot dialogue using Dempster–Shafer theoretic pragmatics. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Williams, T., & Scheutz, M. (2018). Reference resolution in robotics: A givenness hierarchy theoretic approach. In J. Gundel & B. Abbott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Williams, T., Schreitter, S., Acharya, S., & Scheutz, M. (2015). Towards situated open-world reference resolution. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on AI for HRI (AI-HRI).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Williams, T., Thames, D., Novakoff, J., & Scheutz, M. (2018). Thank you for sharing that interesting fact!: Effects of capability and context on indirect speech act use in task-based human-robot dialogue. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Wilson, J. R., Krause, E., Scheutz, M., & Rivers, M. (2016). Analogical generalization of actions from single exemplars in a robotic architecture. In Proceedings of AAMAS 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Yu, C., Schermerhorn, P., & Scheutz, M. (2012). Adaptive eye gaze patterns in interactions with human and artificial agents. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 1(2), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Zech, P., Haller, S., Lakani, S. R., Ridge, B., Ugur, E., & Piater, J. (2017). Computational models of affordance in robotics: A taxonomy and systematic classification. Adaptive Behavior, 25(5), 235–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work on DIARC has been supported by various research grants from the US National Science Foundation and the US Office of Naval Research over the years, most recently by NSF grant IIS1316809 and ONR grant N00014-16-1-2278.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HRI Laboratory, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA

    Matthias Scheutz, Evan Krause, Bradley Oosterveld, Vasanth Sarathy & Tyler Frasca

  2. MIRROR Lab, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 80401, USA

    Thomas Williams

Authors
  1. Matthias Scheutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evan Krause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bradley Oosterveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vasanth Sarathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tyler Frasca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Scheutz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Filosofia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    Maria Isabel Aldinhas Ferreira

  2. Instituto de Sistemas e Robótica, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    João Silva Sequeira

  3. Instituto de Sistemas e Robótica, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    Rodrigo Ventura

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scheutz, M., Williams, T., Krause, E., Oosterveld, B., Sarathy, V., Frasca, T. (2019). An Overview of the Distributed Integrated Cognition Affect and Reflection DIARC Architecture. In: Aldinhas Ferreira, M., Silva Sequeira, J., Ventura, R. (eds) Cognitive Architectures. Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, vol 94. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97550-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97550-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97549-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97550-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation