Abstract
Recently, there have been many emerging smartphone-based applications that are used in marketing activities including agricultural products. However there has not much published about what drives people to engage in online purchasing of agriculture products. This study aims to reveal the factors that influence the intention to use smartphone-based application in purchasing organic agriculture products. The smartphone-based application used in this study namely Kecipir. Samples were taken by non-probabilistic method of consumers who intend to use Kecipir application to buy organic agriculture products, with the sample of 150 respondents in Jabodetabek area of Indonesia. Data analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), while technique research conducted by survey with the online questionnaire as a tool of data collection. The result showed that all variables used in this study, namely compatibility, altruism, perceived risk, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness were significant determinant factors of behavioral intention to use Kecipir, whether it directly influenced intention or indirectly influence intention through attitude toward using the application. The limitations of this study will be discussed further.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- AL:
-
Altruism
- APJII:
-
Association of Internet Network Providers Indonesia
- ATU:
-
attitude toward using
- AU:
-
actual usage
- AVE:
-
Average Variance Extracted
- BI:
-
behavioral intention to use
- C:
-
Compatibility
- CFA:
-
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
- CFI:
-
comparative fit index
- GFI:
-
goodness of fit index
- IDT:
-
Innovation Diffusion Theory
- MI:
-
modification indices
- NFI:
-
normed fit index
- PE:
-
perceived ease of use
- PR:
-
perceived risk
- PU:
-
perceived usefulness
- RMR:
-
root mean square residual
- RMSEA:
-
root mean square error of approximation
- SEM:
-
Structural Equation Modeling
- TAM:
-
Technology Acceptance Model
- TLI:
-
Tucker-Lewis Index
- TRA:
-
Theory of Reasoned Action
- X2 :
-
Chi Square
References
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. Statistik pengguna dan perilaku pengguna internet Indonesia [Statistic and behavior of Indonesian internet user]. 2016. www.apjii.or.id. Accessed 17 Mar 2017. [in Bahasa Indonesia].
Hadi F. Transaksi e-Commerce di Indonesia pada 2016 mencapai 4, 89 miliar dolar AS [E-commerce transactions in Indonesia in 2016 reached 4.89 billion US Dollars]. 2017. http://www.tribunnews.com/bisnis/2017/02/20/transaksi-e-commrece-di-indonesia-pada-2016-mencapai-489-miliar-dolar-as. Accessed 15 Mar 2017. [in Bahasa Indonesia].
Anggraini L. Kecipir.com Ingin Bantu Distribusi Produk Petani Lebih Baik [Kecipir.com wants to help distribution of farmers’ products better]. 2016. http://teknologi.metrotvnews.com/read/2016/04/25/519039/Kecipir-com-ingin-bantu-distribusi-produk-petani-lebih-baik. Accessed 17 Mar 2017. [in Bahasa Indonesia].
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MISQ. 1989;13(3):319–40.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage. 2003;40(3):191–204.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci. 1966;27(3):451–81.
Choo H, Chung JE, Pysarchik DT. Antecedents to new food product purchasing behavior among innovator groups in India. EJM. 2004;38(5/6):608–25.
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoritical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1002.
Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1993.
Wu JH, Wang SC. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2005;42:719–29.
Wei WC. A technology acceptance model: mediate and moderate effect. APMR. 2009;14(4):461–76.
El-Kasim M. A test of technology acceptance model in the use of social media among pr practitioners in Nigeria. Search. 2016;8(2):19–33.
Chen H, Rong W, Ma X, Qu Y, Xiong Z. An extended technology acceptance model for mobile social gaming service popularity analysis. Mob Inf Syst. 2017;2017:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/3906953.
Shih HP. Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior. Inf Manag. 2004;41:719–29.
Pavlou PA. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. IJEC. 2003;7(3):101–34.
Forsythe S, Shi B. Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping. J Bus Res. 2003;56(11):867–75.
Juniwati. Influence of perceived usefulness, ease of use, risk on attitude and intention to shop online. EJBM. 2014;6(7):21–226.
Wu C, Liu R. A study on consumers’ intentions and attitudes to fresh agricultural products for online shopping in China. IJSST. 2016;17:21.1. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSST.a,17.45.21.
Akram MS. How perceived risk affects online purchase intention: consumer’s perspective. Clos Guiot Puyricard: Institut d’Administration des Entreprises; 2008.
Rogers EM. The diffusion of innovation. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
Vijayasarathy LR. Predicting consumer intention to use on-line shopping: the case for augmented technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2004;41:747–62.
Bellman S, Lohse GL, Johnson EJ. Predictors of on-line buying behavior. Commun ACM. 1999;42(2):32–8.
Jayasingh S, Eze UC. An empirical analysis of consumer behavioral intention toward mobile coupons in Malaysia. IJOBM. 2009;4(2):221–42.
Hsu CL, Lin CC. Acceptance of blog usage: the role of technology acceptance, social influence, and knowledge sharing motivation. Inf Manag. 2008;45:65–74.
Sugiyono. Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D [Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods]. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2010. [in Bahasa Indonesia].
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2010.
Chin WW. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, editor. Modern method for business research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1998. p. 295–336.
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. EJBRM. 2008;6(1):53–60.
Ghozali I. Model persamaan struktural konsep dan aplikasi dengan program AMOS 22.0 [Model of structural equations, concepts and applications with the AMOS 22.0 program]. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2014. [in Bahasa Indonesia].
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable suggestions and comments of the reviewer of International Conference on Tropical Agriculture 2017 on earlier drafts of this paper as well as the Editor for Springer-ICTA Proceeding 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Imawati, A.P., Marwanti, S., Irianto, H. (2018). Analysis of Consumers’ Intention to Use Smartphone-Based Application in Purchasing Organic Agricultural Products. In: Sukartiko, A., Nuringtyas, T., Marliana, S., Isnansetyo, A. (eds) Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Tropical Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97553-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97553-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97552-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97553-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)