Skip to main content

Analysis of Consumers’ Intention to Use Smartphone-Based Application in Purchasing Organic Agricultural Products

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Tropical Agriculture

Abstract

Recently, there have been many emerging smartphone-based applications that are used in marketing activities including agricultural products. However there has not much published about what drives people to engage in online purchasing of agriculture products. This study aims to reveal the factors that influence the intention to use smartphone-based application in purchasing organic agriculture products. The smartphone-based application used in this study namely Kecipir. Samples were taken by non-probabilistic method of consumers who intend to use Kecipir application to buy organic agriculture products, with the sample of 150 respondents in Jabodetabek area of Indonesia. Data analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), while technique research conducted by survey with the online questionnaire as a tool of data collection. The result showed that all variables used in this study, namely compatibility, altruism, perceived risk, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness were significant determinant factors of behavioral intention to use Kecipir, whether it directly influenced intention or indirectly influence intention through attitude toward using the application. The limitations of this study will be discussed further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AL:

Altruism

APJII:

Association of Internet Network Providers Indonesia

ATU:

attitude toward using

AU:

actual usage

AVE:

Average Variance Extracted

BI:

behavioral intention to use

C:

Compatibility

CFA:

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

CFI:

comparative fit index

GFI:

goodness of fit index

IDT:

Innovation Diffusion Theory

MI:

modification indices

NFI:

normed fit index

PE:

perceived ease of use

PR:

perceived risk

PU:

perceived usefulness

RMR:

root mean square residual

RMSEA:

root mean square error of approximation

SEM:

Structural Equation Modeling

TAM:

Technology Acceptance Model

TLI:

Tucker-Lewis Index

TRA:

Theory of Reasoned Action

X2 :

Chi Square

References

  1. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. Statistik pengguna dan perilaku pengguna internet Indonesia [Statistic and behavior of Indonesian internet user]. 2016. www.apjii.or.id. Accessed 17 Mar 2017. [in Bahasa Indonesia].

  2. Hadi F. Transaksi e-Commerce di Indonesia pada 2016 mencapai 4, 89 miliar dolar AS [E-commerce transactions in Indonesia in 2016 reached 4.89 billion US Dollars]. 2017. http://www.tribunnews.com/bisnis/2017/02/20/transaksi-e-commrece-di-indonesia-pada-2016-mencapai-489-miliar-dolar-as. Accessed 15 Mar 2017. [in Bahasa Indonesia].

  3. Anggraini L. Kecipir.com Ingin Bantu Distribusi Produk Petani Lebih Baik [Kecipir.com wants to help distribution of farmers’ products better]. 2016. http://teknologi.metrotvnews.com/read/2016/04/25/519039/Kecipir-com-ingin-bantu-distribusi-produk-petani-lebih-baik. Accessed 17 Mar 2017. [in Bahasa Indonesia].

  4. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MISQ. 1989;13(3):319–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage. 2003;40(3):191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis Sci. 1966;27(3):451–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choo H, Chung JE, Pysarchik DT. Antecedents to new food product purchasing behavior among innovator groups in India. EJM. 2004;38(5/6):608–25.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoritical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu JH, Wang SC. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2005;42:719–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei WC. A technology acceptance model: mediate and moderate effect. APMR. 2009;14(4):461–76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. El-Kasim M. A test of technology acceptance model in the use of social media among pr practitioners in Nigeria. Search. 2016;8(2):19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen H, Rong W, Ma X, Qu Y, Xiong Z. An extended technology acceptance model for mobile social gaming service popularity analysis. Mob Inf Syst. 2017;2017:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/3906953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shih HP. Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior. Inf Manag. 2004;41:719–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pavlou PA. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. IJEC. 2003;7(3):101–34.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Forsythe S, Shi B. Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in internet shopping. J Bus Res. 2003;56(11):867–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Juniwati. Influence of perceived usefulness, ease of use, risk on attitude and intention to shop online. EJBM. 2014;6(7):21–226.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu C, Liu R. A study on consumers’ intentions and attitudes to fresh agricultural products for online shopping in China. IJSST. 2016;17:21.1. https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSST.a,17.45.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akram MS. How perceived risk affects online purchase intention: consumer’s perspective. Clos Guiot Puyricard: Institut d’Administration des Entreprises; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers EM. The diffusion of innovation. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vijayasarathy LR. Predicting consumer intention to use on-line shopping: the case for augmented technology acceptance model. Inf Manag. 2004;41:747–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bellman S, Lohse GL, Johnson EJ. Predictors of on-line buying behavior. Commun ACM. 1999;42(2):32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jayasingh S, Eze UC. An empirical analysis of consumer behavioral intention toward mobile coupons in Malaysia. IJOBM. 2009;4(2):221–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu CL, Lin CC. Acceptance of blog usage: the role of technology acceptance, social influence, and knowledge sharing motivation. Inf Manag. 2008;45:65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sugiyono. Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D [Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods]. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2010. [in Bahasa Indonesia].

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chin WW. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, editor. Modern method for business research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1998. p. 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. EJBRM. 2008;6(1):53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ghozali I. Model persamaan struktural konsep dan aplikasi dengan program AMOS 22.0 [Model of structural equations, concepts and applications with the AMOS 22.0 program]. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2014. [in Bahasa Indonesia].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable suggestions and comments of the reviewer of International Conference on Tropical Agriculture 2017 on earlier drafts of this paper as well as the Editor for Springer-ICTA Proceeding 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Imawati, A.P., Marwanti, S., Irianto, H. (2018). Analysis of Consumers’ Intention to Use Smartphone-Based Application in Purchasing Organic Agricultural Products. In: Sukartiko, A., Nuringtyas, T., Marliana, S., Isnansetyo, A. (eds) Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Tropical Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97553-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics