Abstract
The 2008 crisis has revealed, in Portugal, a political culture characterised by deeply dissatisfied and sceptical democrats, who have made the recourse to “exit” strategies of the political system (through electoral abstention) the prime “punishing” answer to the political class’s austerity policies. This is a very different attitude from the “critical citizens” who are characterised by a more demanding and challenging attitude towards the status quo through protest and vote in new radical and populist parties, as is happening in other peripheral European countries. This chapter seeks to answer some of the following questions: Faced with the rapid resurgence of the narratives of Southern European “exceptionalism”, how was the Portuguese democracy able, or not able to weather the legitimacy crisis? To what extent do the diffuse and specific types of support for the political system remain independent of each other in these hard times? What changes have occurred in the evolution of these two types of political support during this period? Are there signs that the economic crisis created transitory (pendulum effects) or lasting and stronger effects (catalyst effects) in the legitimacy of the political system in the citizens’ eyes?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdelzadeh, A., Özdemir, M., & Maarten, V. Z. (2015). Dissatisfied Citizens: An Asset to or a Liability on the Democratic Functioning of Society? Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(4), 410–436.
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Caldas, J. C. (2012). The Consequences of Austerity Policies in Portugal. International Policy Analysis, 1–5.
Dahlberg, S., Linde, J., & Holmberg, S. (2013). Dissatisfied Democrats: A Matter of Representation or Performance? (Working Paper Series 2013: 8). The Quality of Government Institute (QOG), University of Gothenburg.
Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges. Democratic Choices. The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2013). The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. London: Sage.
Dalton, R. J. (2014). The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dalton, R. J., & Welzel, C. (2014). The Civic Culture Transformed: Fom Allegiant to Assertive Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Giorgi, E., & Santana-Pereira, J. (2016). The 2015 Portuguese Legislative Election: Widening the Coalitional Space and Bringing the Extreme Left in. South European Society and Politics, 21(4), 451–468.
De Sousa, L. (2008). Clientelism and the Quality(ies) of Democracy. Public and Policy Aspects (DIS Working Paper 2008/2). Center for the Study of Imperfections in Democracy. Budapest: Central European University.
Diamond, L. J. (2002). Thinking About Hybrid Regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35.
Doorenspleet, R. (2012). Critical Citizens, Democratic Support and Satisfaction in African Democracies. International Political Science Review, 33(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512111431906.
Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
Easton, D. (1975). A Reassessment of the Concept of Political Support. The British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.
Estanque, E., & Costa, H. A. (2017). Building the “Contraption”: Anti-austerity Movements and Political Alternative in Portugal. In Challenging Austerity (pp. 125–146). London: Routledge.
European Commission. (2015). Speech Programme and an Investment Stabilisation Function.
Fails, M. D., & Pierce, H. N. (2010). Changing Mass Attitudes and Democratic Deepening. Political Research Quarterly, 63(1), 174–187.
Feng, Y. (2003). Democracy, Governance, and Economic Performance: Theory and Evidence. Cambridge: MIT press.
Ferreira, A. R. et al. (2017). Portuguese Government Solution: The Fourth Way to Social-Democratic Politics. Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2017). The Signs of Deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 5–15.
Freire, A. (2013). A crise como oportunidade e a terapia de choque. In E. Paz Ferreira (Ed.), A Austeridade Cura? A Austeridade Mata? (pp. 73–108). Lisboa: Associação Académica da Faculdade de Direito de Lisboa.
Gjefsen, T. (2012). Sources of Regime Legitimacy. Quality of Government and Electoral Democracy. Oslo: Department of Political Science, University of Oslo.
Gurnani, S. (2016). The Financial Crisis in Portugal: Austerity in Perspective. Volume 13—Portugal: Navigating from Crisis to Growth 12. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/perspectives-v33/12. Consulted May 2018.
Hofferbert, R. I., & Klingemann, H.-D. (2001). Democracy and Its Discontents in Post-wall Germany. International Political Science Review, 22(4), 363–378.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (2003). How Solid Is Mass Support for Democracy—And How Can We Measure It? PS. Political Science & Politics, 36(1), 51–57.
Klingemann, H.-D. (1999). Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance (pp. 31–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klingemann, H.-D. (2013). Dissatisfied Democrats. Evidence from Old and New Democracies. Wissenschaftszentrum fuer Sozialforschung, Berlim. https://nyuad.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyuad/departments/social-science/documents/Workshops. Consulted September 2016.
Lagos, M. (2003). Support for and Satisfaction with Democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(4), 471–487.
Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391–408.
Logan, C., & Mattes, R. (2012). Democratizing the Measurement of Democratic Quality: Public Attitude Data and the Evaluation of African Political Regimes. European Political Science, 11(4), 469–491.
Magalhães, P. C. (2014a). The Elections of the Great Recession in Portugal: Performance Voting Under a Blurred Responsibility for the Economy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(2), 180–202.
Magalhães, P. C. (2014b). Introduction—Financial Crisis, Austerity, and Electoral Politics. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(2), 125–133.
Magalhães, P. C. (2017). A Tale of Two Elections: Information, Motivated Reasoning, and the Economy in the 2011 and 2015 Portuguese Elections. Análise Social, 52(225), 736–758.
Mahoney, J. (2007). Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 40(2), 122–144.
Morlino, L. (2009). Are There Hybrid Regimes? Or Are They Just an Optical Illusion? European Political Science Review, 1(2), 273–296.
Moury, C., & Freire, A. (2013). Austerity Policies and Politics: The Case of Portugal. Pôle Sud, 39(2), 35–56. https://www.cairn.info/revue-pole-sud-2013-2-page-35.htm. Consulted May 2018.
Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pereira, P. T., & Wemans, L. (2012). Portugal and the Global Financial Crisis: Short-Sighted Politics, Deteriorating Public Finances and the Bailout Imperative (Working Paper No. 26/201/DE/UECE). School of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon.
Puddington, A., & Roylance, T. (2017). Populist and Autocrats: The Dual Threat to Global Democracy. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2017.
Rodríguez-Teruel, J., Barrio, A., & Barberà, O. (2016). Fast and Furious: Podemos’ Quest for Power in Multi-level Spain. South European Society and Politics, 21(4), 561–585.
Rohlfing, I. (2012). Case Studies and Causal Inference: An Integrative Framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating Political Legitimacy Electoral Democracy Versus Quality of Government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330.
Schedler, A., & Sarsfield, R. (2007). Democrats with Adjectives: Linking Direct and Indirect Measures of Democratic Support. European Journal of Political Research, 46(5), 637–659.
Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142.
Stefan, D., Linde, J., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democratic Discontent in Old and New Ddemocracies. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12170.
Teixeira, C. P. (2018). Quality of Democracy in Portugal. Lisbon: FFMS.
Teixeira, C. P., Tsatsanis, E., & Belchior, A. M. (2014). Support for Democracy in Times of Crisis: Diffuse and Specific Regime Support in Portugal and Greece. South European Society and Politics, 19(4), 501–518.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pequito Teixeira, C., de Almeida Pereira, P., Belchior, A.M. (2019). Political Discontentment in Portugal Post-Troika: Risks and Opportunities. In: Costa Pinto, A., Pequito Teixeira, C. (eds) Political Institutions and Democracy in Portugal. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98152-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98152-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98151-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98152-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)