Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Media and YouTube

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rheumatology Teaching

  • 1443 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past years, there has been a growing interest in using social media in every area of education whether undergraduate, postgraduate or continuous medical education. As of March 2018, “Alexa Internet” identified YouTube and Facebook as the second and third most popular websites on the Internet. The YouTube educational value has been epitomized by the establishment of YouTube Education. When applied to medical education, social media as well as YouTube are seen to hold remarkable potential to help both medical educators/healthcare professionals and students to enter this new technology era, enhancing their teaching–learning experiences through customization, personalization and opportunities for networking and collaboration. Given the relative easiness of producing and uploading videos on YouTube and social media as well as its free content, it has become a pool of a huge quantity of educational videos in different specialties uploaded by students and teachers. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce theoretical aspects of using social media and YouTube in education and explore the effectiveness and utility of YouTube as an educational resource across the medical education continuum and its potential impact on the learning process and how these new tools are currently being employed for medical education. It will expand to discuss how to create your videos and the art of optimizing your educational video.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J. Medical education for the future: identity, power and location. Springer: Dordrecht. isbn: 9789048196913.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Masic I, Pandza H, Toromanovic S, Masic F, Sivic S, Zunic L, Masic Z. Information technologies (ITs) in medical education. Acta Informatica Med. 2011;19(3):68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooke M, Irby DM, Sullivan W, Ludmerer KM. American medical education 100 years after the Flexner report. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1339–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Howick J. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell/BMJ Books; 2011. isbn: 9781405196673

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Tilson JK, Kaplan SR, Harris JL, Hutchinson A, Ilic D, Niederman R, Potomkova J, Zwolsman SE. Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor P. From patient data to medical knowledge: the principles and practice of health informatics. Malden: Wiley; 2006. isbn: 9780727917731

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Westwood JD. Medicine meets virtual reality 2001: outer space, inner space, virtual space. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001. isbn: 9781586031435

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cullen R. Health information on the internet: a study of providers, quality, and users. Westport: Praeger; 2006. isbn: 9780865693227

    Google Scholar 

  9. King’s Undergraduate Medical Education in the Community (KUMEC). 2016. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/lsm/research/divisions/hscr/study/undergradops/kumec/MBBS-2020.aspx. Accessed on 22 Apr 2018.

  10. Borges NJ, Manuel S, Elam CL, Jones BJ. Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school. Acad Med. 2006;81:571–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa J, Edelson J, Arora VM. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(4):517–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miedany E. Flipped learning: can rheumatology lead the shift in medical education? Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2018. [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shamji AI, Law M. The role of technology in medical education: lessons from the University of Toronto. UTMJ. 2011;88(3):150–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bozorgmehr K, Saint VA, Tinnemann P. The ‘global health’ education framework: a conceptual guide for monitoring, evaluation and practice. Glob Health. 2011;7(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Celletti F, Reynolds TA, Wright A, Stoertz A, Dayrit M. Educating a new generation of doctors to improve the health of populations in low- and middle income countries. PLoS Med. 2011;8(10):e1001108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarz MR. Globalization and medical education. Med Teach. 2001;23(6):533–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Potomkova J, Mihal V, Schwarz D. In: Kofuji S, editor. Medical education for YouTube generation, e-learning – engineering, on-job training and interactive teaching. isbn: 978-953-51-0283-0. InTech; 2012. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/e-learning-engineering-on-job-training-andinteractive-teaching/medical-education-for-youtube-generation.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palmer D, El Miedany Y. Shared decision making for patients living with inflammatory arthritis. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(1):31–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures – a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1657–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bridge PD, Jackson M, Robinson L. The effectiveness of streaming video on medical student learning: a case study. Med Educ Online. 2009;14:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hurtubise L, Martin B, Gilliland A, Mahan J. To play or not to play: leveraging video in medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-05-01-32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Orientale E Jr, Kosowicz L, Alerte A, et al. Using web-based video to enhance physical examination skills in medical students. Fam Med. 2008;40:471–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Srivastava G, Roddy M, Langsam D, Agrawal D. An educational video improves technique in performance of pediatric lumbar punctures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28:12–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalish R, Dawiskiba M, Sung YC, Blanco M. Raising medical student awareness of compassionate care through reflection of annotated videotapes of clinical encounters. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011;24:490.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Azer SA. Mechanisms in cardiovascular diseases: how useful are medical textbooks, eMedicine, and YouTube? Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;38(2):124–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koya KD, Bhatia KR, Hsu JTS, Bhatia AC. YouTube and the expanding role of videos in dermatologic surgery education. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2012;31(3):163–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt RS, Shi LL, Sethna A. Use of streaming media (YouTube) as an educational tool for surgeons-a survey of AAFPRS members. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(3):230–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ. 2016;73(6):1072–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiu C, Lee GC, Yang J. A comparative study on post-class lecture video viewing. Adv Technol Learn. 2006;3(3):195203. https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.208.2006.3.208-0886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. DeWitt D, Alias N, Siraj S, Yaakub MY, Ayob J, Ishak R. The potential of Youtube for teaching and learning in the performing arts. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;103:1118–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lindstrom R. The business week guide to multimedia presentations: create dynamic presentations that inspire. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zahn C, Pea R, Hesse FW, Rosen J. Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for complex collaborative design processes. J Learn Sci. 2010;19:403–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alias N, DeWitt D, Siraj S. Development of science pedagogical module based on learning styles and technology. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Malaysia Sdn. Bhd; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bunus P. The Social Network Classroom. Technology enhanced learning: Quality of teaching and educational reform. 2010;73:517–24.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Greenhow C, Robelia B. Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learn Media Technol. 2009;34(2):119–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Youtube.com. Statistics YouTube. 2018. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html. [cited 22 April 2018].

  38. Support.google.com. Demographics report YouTube help. 2018. Available from: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1715072?hl=en-GB. [cited 22 April 2018].

  39. Leonard W. A comparison of student performance following instruction by interactive videodisc versus conventional laboratory. J Res Sci Teach. 1992;29:93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Romanov K, Nevgi A. Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning? Med Teach. 2007;29:490–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saxena V, Natarajan P, O'Sullivan PS, et al. Effect of the use of instructional anatomy videos on student performance. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bridge PD, Jackson M, Robinson L. The effectiveness of streaming video on medical student learning: a case study. Med Educ Online. 2009;14:11. https://doi.org/10.3885/meo.2009.Res00311. Available from http://www.med-ed-online.org.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. McNulty JA, Hoyt A, Gruener G, et al. An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Schacter J. The impact of education technology on student achievement: what the most current research has to say. 1st ed. Santa Monika: The Milken Family Foundation; 1999. p. 12. URL: https://bookertdev.ito.lacoe.edu/funding_coordination/docs/impact_of_et.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Roberts G. Technology and learning expectations of the net generation. In: Oblinger DG, Oblinger JL, editors. Educating the net generation. 1st ed. Boulder: EDUCAUSE; 2005. p. 3.1–7. Accessed 22 Apr 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  47. DiLullo C, McGee P, Kriebel RM. Demystifying the Millennial student: a reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4:214–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilen-Daugenti T. Twenty-first century trends for higher education. 1st ed. San Jose: Cisco Systems; 2007. p. 12. URL: http://ftp.ucv.ve/Documentos/Evento_Cisco/Top_trends_in_Education_White_Paper.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stanciu A, Mihai F, Aleca O. Social networking as an alternative environment for education. Acc Manag Inf Syst. 2012;11:56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lei C, Krilavicius T, Zhang N, et al. Using Web 2.0 tools to enhance learning in higher education. A case study in technological education. In: Proceedings of the international multi-conference of engineers and computer scientists (IMECS). vol. II. 2012. URL: http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2012/IMECS2012_pp1153-1156.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2018.

  52. Nicole A. Buzzetto-more social networking in undergraduate education. Special section on social networking, teaching, and learning. Interdiscip J Inform Knowl Manag. 2012;7:63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Forgie S, Duff J, Ross S. Twelve tips for using Twitter as a learning tool in medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35:8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hans O, Carlos R, Murray E, Alejandro J. What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e1. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1. http://www.jmir.org/2005/1/e1/v7e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Webcite: Statline. http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=71098ned&D1=33-133&D2=0-2&D3=a&VW=T.

  56. Ebrahim R. Exploring technology impacts of healthcare 2.0 initiatives. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(3):255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. voor de Volksgezondheid R. Webcite: Health 2.0: plan van aanpak. 2010. http://www.rvz.net/data/download/4372-09_plan_van_aanpak_definitief.doc.

  58. Eysenbach G, Köhler C. Health-related searches on the internet. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291(24):2946.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Cure together. Website: http://www.curetogether.com.

  60. Community Artsennet.nl. Website: http://www.artsennet.nl/.

  61. Engelen LJLPG. Slideshare. Website: Zorg 2.0 intro Spanje VWS/Nictiz. http://www.slideshare.net/lucienengelen/zorg-20-intro-spanje-vws-nictiz.

  62. O’Reilly T. O’Reilly media. Website: What is web 2.0? http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html.

  63. Hansen Margaret M. Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: a review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e26. http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e26/v10i3e26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wikipedia. Website: Web 2.0. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0.

  65. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Website: Working party on the information economy. participative web: user-created content. 2007. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/14/38393115.pdf.

  66. Mark T. Twittering healthcare: social media and medicine. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(6):507–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Van De Belt T, Engelen L, Schoonhoven L. Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12(2):e18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Conn J. Website: Upgrading to Health 2.0. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6375/is_200712/ai_n25529042/.

  69. Benjamin H, Indra J, Jonathan W. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Scienceroll MB. Webcite: Medicine 2.0. http://scienceroll.com/medicine-20/.

  71. Gunther E. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Patients Like Me. Website: http://www.patientslikeme.com/.

  73. Hello Health. Website: http://hellohealth.com/.

  74. Kremer J. De digitale IVF poli. Website: http://www.patientenepd.nl/wpc/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/apeldoorn-kremer-2007.ppt.

  75. Slideshare BB. Website: Parkinson net. http://www.slideshare.net/lucienengelen/bloem-zorg.

  76. De Rijksoverheid KA. Voor Nederland. Website: Behandeling Parkinson voorbeeld van patient centraal. http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/toespraken/2008/12/01/behandeling-parkinson-voorbeeld-van-patient-centraal.html.

  77. Bos L, Marsh A, Carroll D, Gupta S, Rees M. icmcc.org. Website: Patient 2.0 empowerment. http://www.icmcc.org/pdf/ICMCCSWWS08.pdf.

  78. Web 3.0. Techopedia. https://www.techopedia.com/definition/4923/web-30. Accessed on 5 May 2018.

  79. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, Bahlas S, Almedany S, Ahmed I, Palmer D. Toward electronic health recording: evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures system for remote monitoring of early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(12):2106–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, El Aroussy N, Bahlas S, Hegazi M, Palmer D, Youssef S. Toward electronic health recording: evaluation of electronic patient reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) system for remote monitoring of early systemic lupus patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(11):2461–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Palmer D. Assessment of the utility of visual feedback in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis patients: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(10):3061–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Popoiua MC, Grosseck G, Holotescu C. What do we know about the use of social media in medical education? Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;46:2262–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kim K, Yoo-Lee E, Joanna Sin S. Social media as information source: undergraduates’ use and evaluation behavior. Proc Am Soc Info Sci Tech. 2011;48:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  84. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, El Aroussy N, Youssef S. Flipped learning: can rheumatology lead the shift in medical education? Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573397114666180416170156.

  85. Madanick RD. Social media in medical education: embracing a new medium. Paper given at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine on October 27, 2011, as part of the UNC Academy of Educators Lecture Series. 2011. Available at http://www.slideshare.net/ryanmadanickmd/lc11-015so-me-in-meded.

  86. Courosa A. Social media, networked learning & identity. 2011. http://www.slideshare.net/courosa/social-media-networked-learning-identity.

  87. Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Jain SH. Practicing medicine in the age of Facebook. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:649–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Doyle D. E-medical education: an overview. In: Shukla A, Tiwari R, editors. Biomedical engineering and information systems: technologies, tools and applications. Hershey: Medical Information Science Reference; 2011. p. 219–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  90. Clifton A, Mann C. Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(4):311–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Fernandez V, Simo P, Algaba I, Albareda-Sambola M, Salan N, Amante B, et al. “Low-cost educational videos” for engineering students: a new concept based on video streaming and YouTube channels. Int J Eng Educ. 2011;27(3):518–27.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Stohlmann M. YouTube incorporated with Mathematical modelling activities: benefits, concerns, and future research opportunities. Int J Technol Math Educ. 2012;19(3):117–24.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Marks R. I learned it from YouTube! (And other challenges of teaching voice). J Sing. 2013;69(5):589–92.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Duvivier RJ, van Geel K, van Dalen J, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. Learning physical examination skills outside timetabled training sessions: what happens and why? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(3):339–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Bhoopatkar H, Weam A. Medical students describe their patterns of practising clinical examination skills outside time tabled sessions. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Holzinger A, Kickmeier-Rust MD, Wassertheurer S, Hessinger M. Learning performance with interactive simulations in medical education: lessons learned from results of learning complex physiological models with the HAEMOdynamics SIMulator. Comput Educ. 2009;52(2):292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Azer SA. Navigating problem-based learning. Marrickville: Elsevier Australia; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Hessinger M, Holzinger A, Leitner D, Wassertheurer S. Hemodynamic models for education in physiology. Math Comput Simul. 2008;79(4):1039–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Lemley T, Burnham JF. Web 2.0 tools in medical and nursing school curricula. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(1):50–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Azer SA, Guerrero AP, Walsh A. Enhancing learning approaches: practical tips for students and teachers. Med Teach. 2013;35(6):433–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Weiner SA, Stephens G, Nour AY. Information-seeking behaviors of first-semester veterinary students: a preliminary report. J Vet Med Educ. 2011;38(1):21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Mirando MA, Bewley JM, Blue J, Amaral-Phillips DM, Corriher VA, Whittet KM, Arthur N, Patterson DJ. Extension education symposium: reinventing extension as a resource – what does the future hold? J Anim Sci. 2012;90(10):3677–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Keene AB, Shiloh AL, Dudaie R, Eisen LA, Savel RH. Online testing from Google Docs™ to enhance teaching of core topics in critical care: a pilot study. Med Teach. 2012;34(12):1075–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Kingsley K, Galbraith GM, Herring M, Stowers E, Stewart T, Kingsley KV. Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Baudains C, Metters E, Easton G, Booton P. What educational resources are medical students using for personal study during primary care attachments? Educ Prim Care. 2013;24(5):340–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Alexa Traffic Rank for YouTube. 2011. Webcite: http://www.alexa.com/search?q=youtube.com%2C&p=&r=.

  108. Goodwin D. YouTube now serving 4 billion videos daily. Webcite: Search engine watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2141050/YouTube-Now-Serving-4-Billion-Videos-Daily.

  109. Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY. Identifying measures used for assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: a review of current literature. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2(1):e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Azer A, AlGrain H, AlKhelaif R, AlEshaiwi S. Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Butler DP, Perry F, Shah Z, Leon-Villapalos J. The quality of video information on burn first aid available on YouTube. Burns. 2012;1.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Ache KA, Wallace LS. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(4):389–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Schreiber JJ, Warren RF, Hotchkiss RN, Daluiski A. An online video investigation into the mechanism of elbow dislocation. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38(3):488–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Topps D, Helmer J, Ellaway R. YouTube as a platform for publishing clinical skills training videos. Acad Med. 2013;88(2):192–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis – a wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Clifton A, Mann C. Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(4):311–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Human Anatomy Education Channel. Akram Abood Jaffar, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. 2011. URL: www.youtube.com/user/akramjfr.

  118. Azer SA. Can “YouTube” help students in learning surface anatomy? Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(5):465–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Murugiah K, Vallakati A, Rajput K, Sood A, Challa NR. YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2011;82(3):332–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Knösel M, Jung K, Bleckmann A. YouTube, dentistry, and dental education. J Dent Educ. 2011;75(12):1558–68. http://www.jdentaled.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=22184594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Fat MJ, Doja A, Barrowman N, Sell E. YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patient resource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol. 2011;26(7):804–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. El Miedany Y, El Aroussy N, Youssef S, Almedany S, Palmer D. Teaching the millennials: using YouTube for teaching rheumatology in the standard educational setting. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1782.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Jaffar A. YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Ed. 2012;5:158–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Jaffar A. Tips for using YouTube in medical education. Iraqi J Med Sci. 2013;11(2):102–8.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Jackman WM, Roberts P. Students’ perspectives on YouTube video usage as an e-resource in the university classroom. J Educ Technol Syst. 2014;42(3):273–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Chelaru SV, Rodriguez C, Altingovde I. Can social features help learning to rank YouTube videos? Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE. 2012. p. 552–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  127. Camm CF, Sunderlan N, Camm AA. Quality assessment of cardiac auscultation material on YouTube. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36:77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Murugiah K, Vallakati A, Rajput K, et al. YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2011;82:332–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. YouTube. About YouTube. San Francisco: YouTube, LLC; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Bruno CA. URL: http://www.youtube.com/t/about_youtube.

  131. Tao D, Adsul P, Wray R, et al. Search strategy effectiveness and relevance of YouTube videos. Proc Am Soc Info Sci Tech. 2012;49:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Lardinois F. YouTube changes its search ranking algorithm to focus on engagement, not just clicks. Teckcrunch; 2012. http://techcrunch.com/2012/10/12/youtube-changesits-search-ranking-algorithm-to-focus-on-engagementnot-just-clicks/.

  133. YouTube. YouTube support. San Bruno: YouTube, LLC. URL: http://support.google.com/youtube/.

  134. YouTube. Playbook guide: education. San Bruno: YouTube, LLC; 2012. URL: http://storage.googleapis.com/support-kmsprod/SNP_2799330_en_v1.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Khan Academy. Mountain View: Khan Academy. URL: www.khanacademy.org.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. King’s College London, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, Kent, UK

    Yasser El Miedany

  2. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

    Yasser El Miedany

Authors
  1. Yasser El Miedany
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

El Miedany, Y. (2019). Social Media and YouTube. In: Rheumatology Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98213-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98213-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98212-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98213-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation