Skip to main content

An Overview of the Tailored Surgical Approach to Rectal Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Rectal Cancer Care

Abstract

The approach to the patient with rectal cancer should be conducted in a systematic and methodical approach which will ensure that the proper histological diagnosis, staging, and subsequent treatment modalities are performed with the highest standards. Surgical treatment of rectal cancer should be performed by surgeons in centers with special knowledge, training, and experience in the multidisciplinary treatment of these tumors. Treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum has undergone a major change over the last 20 years, one that has been seldom seen in other solid tumors. The surgeon plays an integral part of the multidisciplinary team, and his or her role represents a prognostic factor for the successful treatment of this disease. This chapter focuses on an overview of how these patients are approached from a surgical standpoint and what criteria are used to decide which operation or treatment is best for each specific patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Valentini V, Aristei C, Glimelius B, et al. Multidisciplinary rectal cancer management: 2nd European rectal cancer consensus conference (EURECA-CC2). Radiother Oncol. 2009;92(2):148–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, et al. Standards practice task force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):535–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828cb66c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van de Velde CJ, Boelens PG, Borras JM, et al. EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(1):1.e1–1.e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.048. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet. 2001;357:497–504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Winter L, Bruhn H, Langrehr J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:379–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glimelius B, Beets-Tan R, Blomqvist L, et al. Mesorectal fascia instead of circumferential resection margin in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2142–3. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4473. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, et al. One millimetre is the safe cut-off for magnetic resonance imaging prediction of surgical margin status in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2011;98(6):872–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7458. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doornebosch PG, Ferenschild FT, de Wilt JH, et al. Treatment of recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(9):1234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stipa F, Giaccaglia V, Burza A. Management and outcome of local recurrence following transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(3):262–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P, Bulow S. The outcome of rectal cancer after early salvage surgery following transanal endoscopic microsurgery seems promising. Dan Med J. 2012;59(9):A4507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Levic K, Bulut O, Hesselfeldt P, Bulow S. The outcome of rectal cancer after early salvage TME following TEM compared with primary TME: a case-matched study. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(4):397–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stamos MJ, Murrell Z. Management of early rectal T1 and T2 cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6885s–9s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Willett CG. Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer. Local excision followed by postoperative radiation therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998;8:24–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagman RT, Minsky BD. Conservative management of rectal cancer with local excision and adjuvant therapy. Oncology (Huntingt). 2001;15:513–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia-Aguilar J, Shi Q, Thomas CR Jr. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2N0 rectal cancer: preliminary results of the ACOSOG Z6041 trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):384–91. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1933-7. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown CJ, Fenech DS, McLeod RS. Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD006040.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liao C, Gao F, Cao Y, et al. Meta-analysis of the colon J-pouch vs transverse coloplasty pouch after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Color Dis. 2009;12:624–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fazio VW, Zutshi M, Remzi FH, et al. A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg. 2007;246:481–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, et al. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96:462–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parés D, Duncan J, Dudding T, et al. Investigation to predict faecal continence in patients undergoing reversal of a defunctioning stoma (Porridge enema test). Color Dis. 2008;10(4):379–85. Epub 2007 Aug 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Valente .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Valente, M.A., Hull, T.L. (2019). An Overview of the Tailored Surgical Approach to Rectal Cancer. In: Kwaan, M., Zbar, A. (eds) Comprehensive Rectal Cancer Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98902-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98902-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98901-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98902-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics