Skip to main content

Essentials of Debriefing and Feedback

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Obstetrics and Gynecology

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

Abstract

Debriefing and feedback in healthcare simulation are challenging but essential components of a program. This phase of simulation occurs when the skilled facilitator brings the participants together to review and critique their actions. It is the phase that solidifies the learning process through educational theory based on experiential learning and reflection on action. Several methodologies of debriefing have evolved over decades of experience in medical simulation. No one method has been proven superior over another. The choice of method is determined by the objectives, type of simulation, level of the learner, debriefing environment, equipment, and expertise of the facilitator. A practical approach to simulation debriefing includes addressing the learning climate, diffusion of emotions, defining the debrief objectives, a clinical debrief, a teamwork debrief, and a summary and closure section. Developing expert skills in facilitating a simulation debrief takes practice and a 360 degree feedback in debriefing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: FT Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10):S70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. King HB, Battles J, Baker DP, Alonso A, Salas E, Webster J, Toomey L, Salisbury M. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rudolph JW, et al. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25(2):361–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare. 2015;10(2):106–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Donnell J, et al. Structured and supported debriefing. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dreifuerst KT. Debriefing for meaningful learning: Fostering development of clinical reasoning through simulation. Bloomington: Indiana University; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolbe M, et al. TeamGAINS: a tool for structured debriefings for simulation-based team trainings. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(7):541–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flin R, et al. Anaesthetists' non-technical skills. Br J Anaesth. 2010;105(1):38–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt EA, et al. Pediatric resident resuscitation skills improve after “rapid cycle deliberate practice” training. Resuscitation. 2014;85(7):945–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. https://www.acog.org/-/media/Patient-Safety-Checklists/psc006.pdf?dmc=1.

  13. https://www.cmqcc.org/resources-tool-kits/toolkits/ob-hemorrhage-toolkit.

  14. https://www.mededportal.org/.

  15. Brett-Fleegler M, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc. 2012;7(5):288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. http://harvardmedsim.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DASH.handbook.2010.Final.Rev.2.pdf.

  17. http://harvardmedsim.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DASH.IV.ShortForm.2012.05.pdf.

  18. http://harvardmedsim.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DASH.SV.Short.2010.Final.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily K. Marko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marko, E.K. (2019). Essentials of Debriefing and Feedback. In: Deering, S., Auguste, T., Goffman, D. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Obstetrics and Gynecology. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98995-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98995-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98994-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98995-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics