Skip to main content

Using Social Media to Improve Knowledge Sharing among Healthcare Practitioners

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Mathematical and Statistical Methods (AMMCS 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 259))

Abstract

Aim This paper aims to explore and analyse how findings from social media literature can inform healthcare researchers and providers, particularly in the subject of online healthcare social groups, one of the most promising knowledge sharing approaches in healthcare. Methods This paper conducted a systematic review of the social media literature. The Leximancer software “Lexi-Portal Version 4” was used to analyse 298 studies. The Leximancer software exposed a group of relational themes that supported the interpretative content analysis undertaken. Results Two primary findings stand out in the social media literature: The social networking and communication among healthcare practitioners is crucial for maximizing the group work behaviour, besides, social media contribute to research, practice, develop professionalism, and knowledge sharing, particularly within healthcare services. Conclusions Overall, this paper found that social media has a long and rich history of research in knowledge sharing that offers useful tools to healthcare practitioners. Healthcare practitioners may benefit from participating in healthcare knowledge sharing social media platforms by attaining knowledge that enhances their ability to effectively contribute issues and dilemmas faced in the healthcare profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wasko, M.M.L., Faraj, S.: Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Q. 29(1), 35–57 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wasko, M.M.L., Teigland, R., Faraj, S.: The provision of online public goods: examining social structure in an electronic network of practice. Decis. Support Syst. 47(3), 254–265 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tseng, F.-C., Kuo, F.-Y.: A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice. Comput. Educ. 72, 37–47 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McNurlin, B., Sprague, R.: Supporting Collaboration. Book of Information Systems Management in Practice, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in communication. Perspect. Socially Shared Cogn. 1991(13), 127–149 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. IJsselsteijn, W., van Baren, J., and van Lanen, F.: Staying in touch: social presence and connectedness through synchronous and asynchronous communication media. Hum.-Comput. Interact.: Theory Pract. (Part II) 2(924), e928 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Q. 25(1), 107–136 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alali, H.: Virtual communities of practice success in healthcare sector: a comparative review. In: Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare, pp. 141–153. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alali, H., Salim, J.: Success dimensions of the online healthcare communities of practice. In: Towards an evaluation framework. In: Social Media Mobile Technologies for Healthcare p. 16 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alali, H., Salim, J.: Virtual health communities of practice success factors: towards taxonomy and a framework. Int. J. Web Based Communities 12, 180–194 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hahn, J., Subramani, M.R.: A framework of knowledge management systems: issues and challenges for theory and practice. In: A Framework of Knowledge Management Systems: Issues and Challenges for Theory and Practice, pp. 302–312. Australia (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, K., Lee, S., Kang, I.: KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance. Inf. Manage. 42(3), 469–482 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung, Y., Hur, C., Jung, D., Kim, M.: Identifying key hospital service quality factors in online health communities. J. Med. Internet Res. 17(4) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y.: Knowledge management metrics: a review and directions for future research. Int. J. Knowl. Manage. 1(3), 20–32 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pablos, A.: WHO meeting on knowledge translation in global health: a link to policy and action. Proceedings of Knowledge Management and Health, 10–12 Oct 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Alali, H., Salim, J.: Theoretical and empirical investigation of “Virtual Communities of Practice” success in health care services at rural areas. In: Proceedings of RICTD 2010, Kedah, Malaysia, 23rd– 25th November 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez, I., Gonzalez, A., Sabherwal, R.: Knowledge Management, Solutions. Technology. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.: Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alali, H., Salim, J.: Conceptual Model of “Virtual Communities of Practice” Success in Health Care: A Literature Review, pp. 1–10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alali, H., Salim, J.: Virtual communities of practice: the role of content quality and technical features to increase health care professionals’ satisfaction. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 54, 269–275 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Crofts, K., Bisman, J.: Interrogating accountability: an illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qual. Res.n Acc. Manage. 7(2), 180–207 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sotiriadou, P., Brouwers, J., Le, T.-A.: Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool: a comparison of NVivo and Leximancer. Ann. Leisure Res. 17(2), 218–234 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeffrey, B.: Between-group behaviour in health care: gaps, edges, boundaries, disconnections, weak ties, spaces and holes. a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10, 330 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pablos-Mendez, A., Chunharas, S., Lansang, M.A., Shademani, R., Tugwell, P.: Bulletin of the World Health: Knowledge Translation in Global Health. World Health Organization (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parcell, G.: The Bulletin Interview with Geoff Parcell. World Health Organization (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitham Alali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alali, H. (2018). Using Social Media to Improve Knowledge Sharing among Healthcare Practitioners. In: Kilgour, D., Kunze, H., Makarov, R., Melnik, R., Wang, X. (eds) Recent Advances in Mathematical and Statistical Methods . AMMCS 2017. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99719-3_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics