Skip to main content

Imaging of Renal Colic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pain Imaging

Abstract

Renal colic indicates a type of abdominal pain due to urinary tract obstruction, commonly caused by urinary stones. The classic presentation of renal colic is the sudden onset of severe loin pain, but depending on the site of obstruction, the pain will radiate to the flank, groin, and testes or labia majora. Unfortunately, symptoms due to many other abdominal diseases could be indistinguishable from renal colic, and therefore emergency imaging in patients with suspected renal colic is necessary to rule out other clinical conditions, either renal diseases or gynecologic, gastrointestinal, pancreatic, hepatobiliary, vascular, and musculoskeletal conditions. In this setting, imaging is required to allow rapid diagnosis, to guide patient management, and to evaluate active treatment complications.

Abdominal plain films recognize a urinary stone for its opacity, but only 48–63% of urinary stones are visible. Intravenous urography nowadays has been almost everywhere substituted by ultrasound or computed tomography. Ultrasonography is often performed as an initial imaging modality in case of abdominal pain evaluation since it is safe, noninvasive, repeatable, and quite low expensive. It directly identifies stones as hyperechoic structures with posterior shadowing and recognizes secondary signs of obstruction. Computed tomography generally visualizes urinary calculi, even <3 mm, as high attenuating formations inside urinary tract, it identifies hydronephrosis and perinephric edema, and it is highly sensible in recognizing alternative diagnosis. The low availability of MR in emergency setting does not allow its routine use in renal colic workup but is a useful tool in the evaluation of pregnant and pediatric patients after not conclusive ultrasound imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kambadakone AR, et al. New and evolving concepts in the imaging and management of urolithiasis: urologists’ perspective. Radiographics. 2010;30(3):603–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng PM, et al. What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 1--pathogenesis, types, assessment, and variant anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):W540–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol. 2002;41(4):351–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taourel P, et al. Computed tomography in the nontraumatic renal causes of acute Flank pain. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI. 2008;29(5):341–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jha P, et al. Imaging of flank pain: readdressing state-of-the-art. Emerg Radiol. 2017;24(1):81–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stamatelou KK, et al. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1817–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Samim M, et al. Incidental findings on CT for suspected renal colic in emergency department patients: prevalence and types in 5,383 consecutive examinations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(1):63–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leveridge M, et al. Renal colic: current protocols for emergency presentations. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016;23(1):2–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tirotta D, et al. Abdominal pain: a synthesis of recommendations for its correct management. Ital J Med. 2015;9(2):193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jindal G, Ramchandani P. Acute flank pain secondary to urolithiasis: radiologic evaluation and alternate diagnoses. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(3):395–410. vii.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moore CL, Scoutt L. Sonography first for acute flank pain? J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(11):1703–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf JS. Treatment selection and outcomes: Ureteral calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):421.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Preminger GM, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;52(6):1610–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coll DM, Varanelli MJ, Smith RC. Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(1):101–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wen CC, Nakada SY. Treatment selection and outcomes: Renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):409.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perks AE, et al. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology. 2008;72(4):765–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicolau C, et al. Imaging patients with renal colic-consider ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2015;6(4):441–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ather MH, et al. Alternate and incidental diagnoses on noncontrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography for acute flank pain. Urol J. 2009;6(1):14–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Villa L, et al. Imaging for urinary stones: update in 2015. Eur Urol Focus. 2016;2(2):122–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Piazzese EM, et al. The renal resistive index as a predictor of acute hydronephrosis in patients with renal colic. J Ultrasound. 2012;15(4):239–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Song Y, et al. Can ureteral stones cause pain without causing hydronephrosis? World J Urol. 2016;34(9):1285–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomizawa M, et al. Abdominal ultrasonography for patients with abdominal pain as a first-line diagnostic imaging modality. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(5):1932–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore CL, et al. Prevalence and clinical importance of alternative causes of symptoms using a renal colic computed tomography protocol in patients with flank or back pain and absence of pyuria. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20(5):470–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng PM, et al. What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 2--CT findings, reporting, and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):W548–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Lifetime radiation exposure in patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(11):85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jellison FC, et al. Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2762–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Westphalen AC, et al. Radiological imaging of patients with suspected urinary tract stones: national trends, diagnoses, and predictors. Acad Emer Med. 2011;18(7):700–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chaytor RJ, et al. Determining the composition of urinary tract calculi using stone-targeted dual-energy CT: evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol in a clinical environment. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1067):20160408.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Franken A, et al. In Vivo differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid urinary calculi with third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT at reduced radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(2):358–63.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kalb B, et al. Acute abdominal pain: is there a potential role for MRI in the setting of the emergency department in a patient with renal calculi? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32(5):1012–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spalluto LB, et al. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics. 2012;32(2):317–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Masselli G, et al. Stone disease in pregnancy: imaging-guided therapy. Insights Imaging. 2014;5(6):691–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Masselli G, et al. Imaging of stone disease in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38(6):1409–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Semins MJ, et al. Evaluation of acute renal colic: a comparison of non-contrast CT versus 3-T non-contrast HASTE MR urography. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(1):43–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ripolles T, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of symptomatic ureteral calculi: usefulness of the twinkling artifact. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38(4):863–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kennish SJ, Wah TM, Irving HC. Unenhanced CT for the evaluation of acute ureteric colic: the essential pictorial guide. Postgrad Med J. 2010;86(1017):428–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zarse CA, et al. CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro. Urol Res. 2007;35(4):201–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Christiansen FE, et al. Internal structure of kidney calculi as a predictor for shockwave lithotripsy success. J Endourol. 2016;30(3):323–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hiller N, et al. The relationship between ureteral stone characteristics and secondary signs in renal colic. Clin Imaging. 2012;36(6):768–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Eisner BH, et al. Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. J Urol. 2009;181(4):1710–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dalla Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F. Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(1):4–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Heneghan JP, et al. Soft-tissue “rim” sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997;202(3):709–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Traubici J, Neitlich JD, Smith RC. Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral stones on routine unenhanced helical CT: is there a radiolucent center? Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(1):13–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bell TV, et al. Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths. Radiology. 1998;207(2):363–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kameda T, Taniguchi N. Overview of point-of-care abdominal ultrasound in emergency and critical care. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Rucker CM, Menias CO, Bhalla S. Mimics of renal colic: alternative diagnoses at unenhanced helical CT. Radiographics. 2004;24:S11–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stunell H, et al. Imaging of acute pyelonephritis in the adult. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(7):1820–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gun C, et al. What do we miss without contrast in patients with flank pain? Am J Emer Med. 2016;34(4):765.e3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Revzin MV, et al. Pelvic inflammatory disease: multimodality imaging approach with clinical-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2016;36(5):1579–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Marquardt G, et al. Spontaneous haematoma of the iliac psoas muscle: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(2):109–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Martingano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

15.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Elderly patient presenting in emergency room with acute abdominal pain. Axial reconstruction of unenhanced CT show incomplete duplication with multiple renal stones and dilation. A lumbar ureteral stone is located in the upper system, cranial to ureteral fusion, and multiple stones are impacted in the single pelvic ureter, with the typical “soft tissue rim sign”. Multiple phleboliths are also present. (AVI 23814 kb)

Male patient with right renal colic. Unenhanced CT, axial images, shows moderate right hydronephrosis with fat stranding and perinephric edema. A right obstructing high attenuating stone with “soft tissue rim sign” is recognizable at pyelo-ureteral junction. (AVI 21510 kb)

Male patient with right renal colic. Coronal reconstructed images of unenhanced CT show moderate right hydronephrosis with fat stranding and perinephric edema. A right obstructing high attenuating stone with a larger diameter in the longitudinal axis is recognizable at pyelo-ureteral junction. (AVI 2700 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martingano, P., Cavallaro, M.F.M., Stacul, F., Cova, M.A. (2019). Imaging of Renal Colic. In: Cova, M., Stacul, F. (eds) Pain Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99822-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99822-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99821-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99822-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics