Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 853))

  • 1067 Accesses

Abstract

The paper is devoted to a quantitative approach to support one of the most important problem solution in the area of defense planning process - armed forces (AF) structure optimization. The MUT team, taking part in Polish Strategic Defense Review has proposed a set of methods and tools to support the analyses for the evaluation of required capabilities of Polish Armed Forces in predicted security environment. The set of methods and tools presented in the paper is limited to AF structure optimization problem. The idea of optimization and particular components of the conflict model and methods of solving the problems are presented in the sequence of steps. The structure of AF is fixed for defined threat scenarios under the financial constraints or without such limitations. The measures of combat power of weapon systems for different participants of probable conflict and some important parameters like terrain or type of operation factors (multipliers) are defined and presented. The experimental results of the allocation process are based on the hypothetical conflict evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bracken, J., Kress, M., Rosenthal, R.E.: Warfare Modeling. Wiley, Hoboken (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. The taskform methodology: a technique for assessing comparative force modernization, TASC, Inc., Arlington, USA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zanella, J.A.: Combat Power Analysis is Combat Power Density, School for Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), 201 Reynolds Avenue Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027-2339 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, P.: Situational Force Scoring: Accounting for Combined Arms Effects in Aggregate Combat Models, RAND, Santa Monica (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. STUDENT TEXT 100-3, BATTLE BOOK, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, Kansas ACADEMIC YEAR 07 August

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tillman, M.E.: Optimizing force ratios to develop a course of action for the G3 (Operations Officer). Math. Comput. Model. Int. J. 23(1–2), 55–63 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, G.G., Dell, R.F.: Optimizing Military Capital Planning. Interfaces 34(6), 415–425 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fauske, M.F., Vestli, M., Glærum, S.: Optimization model for robust acquisition decisions in the norwegian armed forces. Interfaces 43(4), 335–352 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tagarev, T., Tsachev, T., Zhivkov, N.: Formalizing the optimization problem long-term capability planning. Inf. Secur. Int. J. 23(1), 99–114 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong, J., Yang, K.W., Liu, J., Zhao, Q.S., Chen, Y.W.: A two-stage preference-based evolutionary multi-objective approach for capability planning problems. Knowl.-Based Syst. 31, 128–139 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Najgebauer, A., Antkiewicz, R., Chmielewski, M., Dyk, M., Kasprzyk, R., Pierzchała D., Jarosław R., Tarapata Z.: The qualitative and quantitative support method for capability based planning of armed forces development. In: Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9012, pp. 224–234 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michalewicz, Z.: Algorytmy genetyczne + struktury danych = programy ewolucyjne. WNT, Warszawa (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldberg, D.E.: Algorytmy genetyczne i ich zastosowania. WNT, Warszawa (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ashlock, D.: Evolutionary Computation for Modeling and Optimization. Springer, New York (2006). ISBN 0-387-22196-4

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrzej Najgebauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Najgebauer, A., Antkiewicz, R., Pierzchała, D., Rulka, J. (2019). Computer Based Methods and Tools for Armed Forces Structure Optimization. In: Świątek, J., Borzemski, L., Wilimowska, Z. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 39th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2018. ISAT 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99996-8_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics